HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted: Apr 5, 2012, 10:37 PM
afiggatt afiggatt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
Second Avenue Subway isn't "in limbo". It's fully funded and opening in 3-4 years.

The MTAs' current five-year budget fully funds the completion of Second Avenue Subway and East Side Access, and begins the East Bronx Metro North rail line and LIRR Main Line expansion.
Phase 1 of the Second Avenue Subway is funded and will be opening in 4-5 years. The point of the article is that Phases 2, 3, 4 are not yet funded. I don't see any solidly established start date for Phase 2 to 125th St, which will use existing tunnels from previous Second Avenue subway attempts, so it should go more quickly whenever they start on it.

A major issue that delayed the start of boring out the tunnels was utility relocation which was much more difficult and took far longer than originally planned. They are also having to shore up building foundations and had to bore through rock rather than use blasting in one place. Utility relocation is a common problem for infrastructure projects these days as they run into utility & communication lines and pipes that are not on the official maps or not where they are supposed to be. Drives the cost up considerabbly if everything else has to be delayed before major digging can start.

The Silver Line in Northern VA was slowed at the start because of utility relocation including communication lines that were not on the maps, because the lines were intentionally not on any public maps.

The article loses major points by not including the East Side Access project. It is a $6+ billion dollar project, roughly equal to the price tag for the complete Silver Line project in Virginia. Maybe they did not want to cover two NYC projects in one article?
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.