HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise & Supertall Proposals

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted: May 18, 2012, 8:18 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
So I says to Mable I says
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina, Suramerica, Planeta Tierra, Sistema Solar, Via Lactea, Universo Conocido...
Posts: 1,532
It could of been way better but at least we have some filler buildings...

I'm more excited about 5th and columbia if that gets built, I'm sure Seattle will see a new tallest someday, trump needs to get back on that.

If San Francisco can build a supertall, almost anywhere can.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted: May 18, 2012, 8:26 PM
shakman's Avatar
shakman shakman is offline
Chairman
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Frederick, MD /Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,651
At least a couple of surface lots will be developed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted: May 19, 2012, 3:07 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
So I says to Mable I says
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina, Suramerica, Planeta Tierra, Sistema Solar, Via Lactea, Universo Conocido...
Posts: 1,532
Does anyone know the exact heights? Are they 500' each?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted: May 19, 2012, 5:37 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 11,628
One is, and the other two are slightly shorter.

Based on other projects, Seattle apparently lets residential projects in certain areas go 10% above the height limit for rooftop architectual/mechanical, but commercial uses can't do that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted: May 19, 2012, 6:30 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
So I says to Mable I says
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina, Suramerica, Planeta Tierra, Sistema Solar, Via Lactea, Universo Conocido...
Posts: 1,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
One is, and the other two are slightly shorter.

Based on other projects, Seattle apparently lets residential projects in certain areas go 10% above the height limit for rooftop architectual/mechanical, but commercial uses can't do that.
Hopefully they are still taller than 492' (150 meters) so they are technically skyscrapers.

Why don't they just built in the areas of Seattle that don't have height limits?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted: May 19, 2012, 6:37 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 11,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Hopefully they are still taller than 492' (150 meters) so they are technically skyscrapers.

Why don't they just built in the areas of Seattle that don't have height limits?
Only the very core of the CBD has no height limits, and even there the FAR limits are pretty tight. Not to mention the uncertainties of tearing down something that might be historic is some cases. It would be tough to amass enough land to develop that much space, or lease other people's space.

There's no technical boundary of what's a "skyscraper," only (a) gradients that enthusiasts set up for categorization that otherwise mean nothing, and (b) design requirements (life safety, etc.) tied to certain heights. Either way, as a local, I'd like taller buildings but economic development, density, and ground-level urban design are more important to me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted: May 20, 2012, 5:06 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
So I says to Mable I says
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina, Suramerica, Planeta Tierra, Sistema Solar, Via Lactea, Universo Conocido...
Posts: 1,532
in any case 500 sooters are still important parts of skylines, so I'm glad these buildings are going through and that there are 3 of them.

Hopefully something bigger can be built in the CBD then, Seattle just has such a nice skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted: Sep 25, 2012, 11:11 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 25,202
http://blog.archpaper.com/wordpress/archives/46627

New Renderings of Rufus, Amazon’s Seattle Campus





September 24, 2012
Ariel Rosenstock

Quote:
Since AN first looked at the proposed design for Amazon’s three-tower complex in the Denny Triangle neighborhood in Seattle last May—and after feedback from the Seattle community and meetings with the Design Review Board over the summer—NBBJ has released new renderings. And the project now has a nickname—Rufus—a nod to the late “Amazon dog,” a Corgi who kept employees company in the office since the early days.

In response to recommendations, the evolved design includes updates to elevations, details along the lower stories, weather protection, and open spaces. Facades are asymmetrical, stepped, and diverse. In a skin study, the office tower on the southeast Block 14 sports a façade of operable windows, glass, pre-finished metal panels and gold accent trim, which connects to the neighboring meeting center via a sky-bridge. Other perspectives reveal glass curtain walls on the six-story meeting center, leaving the auditorium and stairwell exposed. On Block 19, to the southwest, a covered walkway would provide protection during Seattle’s rainy winter months. There are retail storefronts on the lower levels, which will augment the outdoor public parks and plazas.

The combined towers are projected to accommodate approximately 12,000 Amazon employees. A final design recommendation meeting is scheduled for next week, which will further address building materials, connections between towers and blocks, full building elevations, open space, and public art.


__







__________________
Love NEW YORK?

Visit New York's icon. See the City of shores. Walk the Streets of Manhattan.
The evolving skyline, NY Skyscrapers & Construction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted: Dec 29, 2012, 4:40 AM
easy as pie's Avatar
easy as pie easy as pie is offline
fourth chapter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 94109
Posts: 618
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
what an insane amount of surface parking in that photo, like years and years worth of development sites, just in those few blocks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted: Dec 29, 2012, 4:49 AM
seaskyfan seaskyfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,558
Yes and no. The half block across the street from the Amazon property and the full block of parking further north (to the right on the photo) have buildings under construction on them now. Amazon has options on pretty much all the property on the blocks directly north of their sites and seem to be looking at a 10 year buildout.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted: Jan 31, 2013, 9:03 PM
mSeattle's Avatar
mSeattle mSeattle is offline
Socialism 4 Extreme Rich?
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: here
Posts: 8,329
From 12.24.12 Looking forward to see these start.


by mSeattle, on Flickr


by mSeattle, on Flickr


by mSeattle, on Flickr
__________________
Obama: End tax breaks for big oil
mSeattle: If you still support the subsidies, then shut up about prices.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted: Jun 4, 2013, 5:14 AM
mhays mhays is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 11,628
The first building has a shoring permit and is now drilling.
__________________
What's the worst part of Windows 8...the large array of glitches, or the array of things that are designed to work horribly? Do not buy it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted: Jun 5, 2013, 8:47 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vs;hstu
Posts: 12,592
^funny a couple of weeks ago I was in Seattle and walked past that lot a dozen times. I had no idea it was for the new amazon campus.

The three towers aren't the height of architecture by any means, but very good filler nonetheless. Having stayed in that area, you do really notice those empty blocks, so developing them will be very nice.

My own preference would be to have the three blocks developed with 3 x 10-15 story mixed use towers and Amazon build at supertall in the core of the CBD.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise & Supertall Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:29 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.