HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted: Nov 15, 2010, 5:43 PM
RosstheBoss RosstheBoss is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 61
Hey at least we do have some good news in concord moving in and picking up the pieces of surrey's shattered dreams, lol. I was ready a little on there plans they are going to finish up that commercial center at park place project then soon after get going on the other two tower that are part of that project. They have purchased the old sky towers site and plan to build roughly according to the same plan as previous however these will not be marketed as luxury apartments, they are also looking at other sites from them to purchase and develop, so basically just be patient the big boy has come to surrey with plans to get things done. I live in Abbotsford and i would kill to have a developer like concord come in and say that they are going to devote their resources into developing our town center.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted: Nov 16, 2010, 2:39 AM
allan_kuan allan_kuan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,301
In a way it's kind of amazing that Concord Pacific is moving ahead with any sort of project here or elsewhere with the economic situation. Don't they still have to do the Capstan Station project, the North East False Creek project, as well as a few remaining lots in Central Yaletown? Not to mention the Surrey projects and any others that they have elsewhere? I'm very surprised that they're able to do all of this all on a profit, compared to like some other companies that have failed (Millennium comes to mind, although that was because of the pricey Olympic Village). =O
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted: Nov 16, 2010, 3:12 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan_kuan View Post
In a way it's kind of amazing that Concord Pacific is moving ahead with any sort of project here or elsewhere with the economic situation. Don't they still have to do the Capstan Station project, the North East False Creek project, as well as a few remaining lots in Central Yaletown? Not to mention the Surrey projects and any others that they have elsewhere? I'm very surprised that they're able to do all of this all on a profit, compared to like some other companies that have failed (Millennium comes to mind, although that was because of the pricey Olympic Village). =O
Concord is a giant company with projects in Toronto and other places.
The best thing about them is that we know that even if one of their properties sits lifeless for 20+ years, it will be developed eventually. Case in point, NE False Creek.

Also, Surrey doesn't exactly have critical mass yet as an urban area. It's probably easier to build something in Burnaby or Coquitlam since at this time, a downtown already exists, even if they are very small.

The economy also has part of it, and there is no the development business in Surrey is very volatile. However, Calgary also has a very volatile market, with tons of projects being proposed and canceled, and large swings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted: Nov 16, 2010, 8:16 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan_kuan View Post
In a way it's kind of amazing that Concord Pacific is moving ahead with any sort of project here or elsewhere with the economic situation. Don't they still have to do the Capstan Station project, the North East False Creek project, as well as a few remaining lots in Central Yaletown? Not to mention the Surrey projects and any others that they have elsewhere? I'm very surprised that they're able to do all of this all on a profit, compared to like some other companies that have failed (Millennium comes to mind, although that was because of the pricey Olympic Village). =O
Concord Pacific has deep pockets courtesy of Li Ka-Shing in Hong Kong, and they are wise enough to know that a 'crisis' to us is an 'opportunity' for them.
They don't need to be building everywhere all the time.
They can acquire bankrupt projects, complete what needs to be finished so the condos can be sold or the office space leased, and sit on the rest of the untouched land until the market bounces back.
They don't need to pursue a project just because they have the land. Its cheaper to pay taxes on raw land -and cheaper still if they 'donate' that land for a community garden while they wait to start construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted: Nov 16, 2010, 10:08 PM
BCPhil BCPhil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan_kuan View Post
In a way it's kind of amazing that Concord Pacific is moving ahead with any sort of project here or elsewhere with the economic situation. Don't they still have to do the Capstan Station project, the North East False Creek project, as well as a few remaining lots in Central Yaletown? Not to mention the Surrey projects and any others that they have elsewhere? I'm very surprised that they're able to do all of this all on a profit, compared to like some other companies that have failed (Millennium comes to mind, although that was because of the pricey Olympic Village). =O
I think it has to do with their philosophy on how to maximize profit.

The average company will look short term. I have X amount of properties, which one can I develop right now to make me the most money to impress my shareholders (or pocket). So they will abandon their suburb projects in favor of ones closer to downtown. The idea being that if they were both 100 unit projects, the one with the highest retail value will make more money. The property is already owned, so it is a sunken cost, and the cost of building a highrise, be it in Yaletown or Surrey are roughly the same. So selling 100 units at an average of $400,000 is more money than selling 100 units at an average of $200,000. When you subtract virtually the same construction costs, the one in Yaletown is making more net profit.

However, if you look long term, it's a bit different. Right now the market is a bit unstable, and the future will probably have price drops between now and completion. But it's not a constant number across the board, but a % drop. So, the units closer to downtown drop more in real value than the ones in Surrey. The average you could sell a condo for in Yaletown might drop to $300,000, while in Surrey the drop might be to $150,000. It's the same percentage, but it's a lot more value being eaten away in Yaletown. As well, it's harder to sell high end properties in a recession, so you might even have to unload them after construction at even more of a discount (like MW) than you would like. As well, typically in a recession, many of the buyers are first time buyers, looking to get into the market (using government hand outs and low rates). They usually don't have the assets in place to jump right into high end, so there is a bit of a surge in the lower end of the market. It could make selling condos in Surrey a bit easier.

So if you are in the game for the long haul, properly building around the booms and busts makes you more money. Saving that high end location for when the market is at the maximum, will make a lot more money over the long term than building it right away.

If you are looking to make a quick buck, then building downtown right now is a good gamble as there isn't a lot of competition. But if you can hold out for recovery, then waiting is usually the safest bet.

Personally, I'm a bit surprised there isn't more construction going on in Whalley right now, but it would be my guess that a lot of properties are owned by developers focusing on Surrey, so that to those developers, their Whalley properties are like Concords False Creek properties. Its their high value investment and they'll wait for it to recover.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted: Nov 16, 2010, 11:41 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,386
The main concern I would have about Concord Pacific is that they don't seem to be interested in developing commercial office towers (or waiting/holding sites to do so).

I think that the only office space they've developed locally is in the Marinaside project (with Urban Fare) and that was sold off strata-titled office space.

Remember that the Spectrum site was zoned for commercial office space, but Concord Pacific convinced the City to do a zoning swap with lands at the Cambie Bridgehead (moving the commercial space from Spectrum site to "choice of use" space at the Cambie Bridgehead). That has now stranded the future Rogers Arena office tower in a no man's land.

The only commercial block to be built from that zoning swap exercise was the Pivotal Building (Vision Critical) - which was built by PCI if I recall correctly (not by Concord Pacific).

Now each of the other "choice of use" sites at the Cambie Bridgehead either has been developed as residential (The Max) or will be developed as residential (Colours I and II). So much for commercial office space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted: Nov 17, 2010, 11:43 PM
jhausner jhausner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 997
A main point being missed by some is financing. Many projects being stalled not just in the lower mainland but world wide are as a result of banks not giving any money out.

Infinity 2 (towers 2 and 3) was on track, on budget, and going along fine until Lehman Brothers went bankrupt. When the previous owners of Infinity went to get financing every single bank world wide told them to jump in a lake. Same thing with Sky Towers. Even with all the presales no bank would give them money.

Concord is still able to move forward because as has been mentioned they have deep pockets and that's in the form of cash so they don't rely on the banks and can move projects forward. I'm sure this has caused many of the issues with the other developers such as Weststone.

The second issue is again has been mentioned Surrey being a secondary market, but not because it is easier to downsize but rather because prices are cheap so you attract "fast-buck-investors."

What a fast buck investor is is someone that jumps on a development they see as being cheap to invest into that they can flip for a profit in 1 to 2 years maximum. When projects get delayed the development companies have to issue new disclosure agreements and when that happens those fast buck investors opt out and get their money back so they can move on. That causes a development that may be 100% full to drop to anywhere from 40-60% full and now even banks willing to lend back off and require you to fill out the building again. That delay in filling out causes legit purchasers to get cold feet and the remaining investors and you're in this dangerous cycle.

Surrey right now with these towers is seen by fast-buck-investors because they see what happened in Yaletown and hope that will replicate. But due to the delays you were left with numerous projects half empty and having difficulty getting additional financing or any at all from banks.

The final thing are again as has been mentioned, rookie developers in this market. Westone for example has developed several projects but nothing of the scale of Ultra or even the entire Urban Village. So you have an inexperience with the market and the development type. Building a 35 storey high-rise appartment is a far different thing than building a 4 storey wood-frame constructed building. It may seem similar but the scale change introduces far more risk and makes the project far more touchy.

Things will turn around, Surrey is poised to be ready when everything heads off in the right direction again. Canada's market didn't really fail so much as took a sputter due to the US and global market in addition to fear (in many cases unfounded) by Canadians, so we'll be moving forward again fine fairly soon. I'd argue we're pretty well off now already and headed in the right direction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted: Nov 17, 2010, 11:52 PM
mr.A mr.A is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 109
Well said! I agree totally
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted: Nov 17, 2010, 11:54 PM
jhausner jhausner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 997
Btw average prices for units don't drop at the same level regionally in the real world, only on paper does this happen . It is typically exponential and the mid-range properties typically don't drop nearly as much as the higher end properties aka in the same city you may see a $400,000 drop to $375,000 but a $900,000 house may drop to $750,000. It's still a $750,000 house though but the scale of price drop is far greater. That happened last year in Kelowna. The mid range houses stayed about the same no real drop and or no real rise, but the higher end homes dropped quite a bit.

That same system of price correction applies to similar projects across the region. So a higher end 'condo unit' will see a greater drop than a lower end 'condo unit' when you look at an entire metro area (this happens in LA and New York for example).

As such this notion that if a condo in Yaletown drops to $300,000 you'd see a Surrey place drop to $150,000 would never actually happen. I'd argue that in the real world even a Yaletown condo droping by 35% could see the same in Surrey possibly not even drop a penny or at most drop 2-5%. Prices are more relative to location and the specific market that to the overall region itself. If it was regional then there wouldn't be drastic price differences within the Lower Mainland.

Goes both directions.

Vancouver's scale of prices it outrageous and a lot of that has to do with the fact Vancouver has no more land for houses in essence. Not compared to nearly every other city. Burnaby is getting to that point too and New West has been there for a while. The prices for 'houses' go up to an insane amount. Downtown prices also have to be looked at in a bubble because they defy logic and are counter to everything else regionally.

The truth is though that yes a rookie developer will look at two similar projects and axe/delay the one that will net less profit, but only if they have to pick between the two aka do 1 or the other but not both.

Finally all the above gets spun on its head when you introduce wild-card population draws. Those population draws can swing inventory demand in a specific area putting that area into a price bubble outside the regional norm. Things like the new RCMP headquarters, expanded SFU campus, expanded Hospital, and new City Hall for example add potential population draws that can in the next 5 years introduce a population draw to Surrey Central. That means even if the market falls a bit regionally you could see no drop if the demand is strong for properties and inventory not available.

Black and white analysis rarely works in real-estate because there are simply so many factors involved especially in relation to price. I still think people in the lower mainland overprice everything. It's quite ridiculous even in Surrey much of the time. I look at a house going in Surrey for $450,000 and while regionally that's low for a 4 bedroom, 3 bath w/nice back yard and 2 car garage, on a main road, it is still quite high imo. But if it sells then who am I to say otherwise?

Last edited by jhausner; Nov 18, 2010 at 12:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted: May 23, 2012, 12:41 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,386
Has this project been posted before?
They look marginally better than the Bosa ones - i.e. the caps look more interesting.
Or is it a previous taller version of the Bosa project?

http://www.buttjesarchitecture.com/projects.php

Quote:
Gateway
A total of 565 units in a 30-storey, 37-storey and 3-storey townhomes. The Skytrain guideway bisects the site, with the Gateway station only a few hundred feet away.


http://www.buttjesarchitecture.com/projects.php


http://www.buttjesarchitecture.com/projects.php


http://www.buttjesarchitecture.com/projects.php
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted: May 23, 2012, 2:30 AM
CoryHolmes CoryHolmes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 491
I doubt it, since the Bosa towers at 104/University Drive are quite a bit farther away from Gateway than "a few hundred feet". Perhaps these are buildings for that plot of land near the BC Lions practice facility? That had a development as far back as '05? '08? They were going to use precast sections, as I recall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted: May 23, 2012, 2:43 AM
paradigm4 paradigm4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 648
That would be an updated design of this
__________________
civicsurrey.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted: May 23, 2012, 3:22 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,386
Thanks - could be a stale project then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted: May 23, 2012, 3:25 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,371
Posts moved to this thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted: May 23, 2012, 3:54 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,766
last i tried to message them and got no reply on those buildings
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:09 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.