HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9661  
Old Posted: Jun 29, 2012, 4:58 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam/Rainbow Lake
Posts: 25,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I take the 99 nearly everyday (as a bridge between the Canada Line and the M-line) and have never been passed up before and 9 times out of 10 I get a seat
you should try the 84 it's reallly fast and i've always gotten a seat and get a guaranteed seat on the mline at VCC/Clark

i started using it as a bridge/transfer its much quicker than going to granville
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9662  
Old Posted: Jun 29, 2012, 5:54 PM
AverageJoe AverageJoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 24
All 221 Metro bus routes have been ranked in the TransLink Bus System Performance Review dated May 31, 2012 and shows some interesting stats.

http://www.translink.ca/en/site-info/document-library-result.aspx?id={96D5C148-EF81-4F1D-91E6-387E6E4939F9}|{CF3CF6A4-B167-452C-A8F0-E195DFA39011}|&ref={21ADD83C-4B6B-40BF-A72E-9A92988A1AE6}
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9663  
Old Posted: Jun 29, 2012, 5:59 PM
st7860 st7860 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 105
What the Mayor of Surrey doesn't say is that the capacity of the bus route from Surrey Central Skytrain to Langley isn't even close to being full.


http://www.theprovince.com/news/Surr...432/story.html

The city is pushing for three light rail lines in the community: one along 104 Avenue from City Centre to Highway 1, one along King George Boulevard to Newton, and one on Fraser Highway connecting Surrey’s downtown to Langley.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9664  
Old Posted: Jun 29, 2012, 8:02 PM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Surrey
Posts: 935
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
What the Mayor of Surrey doesn't say is that the capacity of the bus route from Surrey Central Skytrain to Langley isn't even close to being full.


http://www.theprovince.com/news/Surr...432/story.html

The city is pushing for three light rail lines in the community: one along 104 Avenue from City Centre to Highway 1, one along King George Boulevard to Newton, and one on Fraser Highway connecting Surrey’s downtown to Langley.
True. The 502 has little problem handling the demand coming from Langley City. You can see this in the map of most passed up stops on the 502 - the huge majority are located in Fleetwood and not eastward.

Mayor Watts' statement is probably from an older news release.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9665  
Old Posted: Jul 3, 2012, 2:30 PM
st7860 st7860 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 105
More fuss about handydart.

But supposedly the average taxisaver ride costs translink $8 vs $30 for a handydart ride - then wouldn't it make sense to scrap handydart instead?

http://www.theprovince.com/health/Di...855/story.html

In the early 1990s, Bruce Chown, a manager at TransLink, envisioned a subsidized taxi program that would supplement the organization’s HandyDart service and provide seniors and the disabled with a cost-effective transportation option.

The ensuing TaxiSaver program, which was enthusiastically backed by the region’s taxi companies, allowed registered HandyDart users to receive the same-day, flexible and direct taxi service most take for granted for half the cost.

Twenty years later, Chown, now retired, has joined the fight to keep the popular program afloat as TransLink mulls a proposal to scrap it so that it can redirect an estimated $1.1 million in annual savings to its HandyDart service.

On Tuesday afternoon, Chown, 79, will voice his opposition to the proposal at a public forum sponsored by the Vancouver Seniors Advisory Committee and the City of Vancouver Persons with Disabilities Advisory Committee.

The two groups have led the charge against TransLink’s proposed cuts, and Chown said he agrees that the plan makes no financial sense and will have a negative impact on the estimated 7,400 people who currently use it.

“We all know the population is aging and more and more people are going to be coming on needing that service,” he told The Province Monday. “It doesn’t make sense to scrap it. It is a good program that is working well. Frail seniors and people with disabilities need it and it should be continued because it is cost-effective.”

North Vancouver resident Monica Howell, who suffers from MS and is on disability assistance, agrees. She said she regularly uses the TaxiSaver program for grocery shopping, trips to the doctor and evenings out.

She also uses it for spontaneous outings, something not attainable through the HandyDart service, which requires advanced booking of two to three days.

“If the price of the cabs is doubled, there are going to be places that I can’t go,” she said. “I’m kind of a spur-of-the-moment kind of person. I would be stuck at home if I didn’t have it (the TaxiSaver program).”

Jill Weiss, chairwoman of the Persons with Disabilities Advisory Committee, said she doesn’t understand why TransLink would cancel a program that is “win-win” for all parties and cheaper to operate than the HandyDart service.

According to 2010 data supplied by TransLink to the Canadian Urban Transit Authority, she said the average cost of a HandyDart ride is $30, compared to the average $8 it costs TransLink for a TaxiSaver ride where the user pays 50 per cent of the fare.

“The cancellation of the TaxiSaver Program doesn’t make human sense and it doesn’t make financial sense,” she said. “It is a really good system. It is good for people and it is good for TransLink and for taxpayers. It’s difficult to understand how they arrived at a decision that will provide less rides for the same amount of money.”

She encouraged everyone concerned with TransLink’s proposal to attend the forum, which will be held at the Community Centre Auditorium (870 Denman St.) from 1-4 p.m. TransLink board member Don Rose is among the scheduled speakers.

colivier@theprovince.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9666  
Old Posted: Jul 3, 2012, 4:37 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Planning Graduate Student
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by st7860 View Post
More fuss about handydart.

But supposedly the average taxisaver ride costs translink $8 vs $30 for a handydart ride - then wouldn't it make sense to scrap handydart instead?
Now that's a very interesting idea to ponder. If one still had to enroll in the program, which would involve proof of permanent disability and/or a means test, then transitioning to an all-taxi system would not only significantly lower the cost per trip, but it would also increase the trip flexibility. Currently one has to book their HandyDart one or more days in advance and they still have 15-30 minute windows of arrival and departure times. That really adds up and it takes away the option for spontaneity. The increase in demand would also prompt Metro Vancouver municipalities to issue more taxi licences, or at least more wheelchair accessible vehicle taxi licences, and that would benefit all taxi users, not just those utilizing it for taxi-saver travel.

How does the taxi-saver system work in practice? Do passengers buy tickets out of pocket, as they would faresaver tickets, or is it 'free' to use when they present their accessible/disability transit pass? Is there a limit to the number of trips per week/month?
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9667  
Old Posted: Jul 3, 2012, 4:57 PM
st7860 st7860 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 105
I don't know who sells taxisavers. However I know that there is some sort of quota system , and users may only buy X amount per month, which leads to hoarding of some sort.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9668  
Old Posted: Jul 3, 2012, 7:28 PM
Mac Write Mac Write is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 463
The TaxiSaver program allows the user to buy 1 or 2 $25 voucher books a month. the $25 book is worth $50 in Taxi rides.

If they cancelled the HandyDart program the cost of using Taxi's exclusively would be way way too much for most. Instead of paying $2.50 for a HandyDart ride that would cost $10-$30+ it would cost the user $10-$30+ for the taxi. This would instantly kill 99% of the people who use HandyDarts ability to go out and do things as they just couldn't afford the taxi rides.

Take the bus you say? with Translink being anti Disabled for buses by saying 400m is easy for anyone to walk to get to a bus, people like me have to rely on HandyDart as that 400m is too prohibitive to walk. I am told all the time "walk to the SkyTrain then go XXXX" Hello uh I can't walk the 800m to the SkyTrain when the bus is 100m from my house.

Point is HandyDart is needed and killing it would only isolate the disabled and senior far more then they are isolated now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9669  
Old Posted: Jul 7, 2012, 7:37 AM
Dave2 Dave2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 396
Stumbled on this, not really on topic in the viaduct thread where the Connaught bridge options of 1982 were discussed a few weeks ago... Sorry Harry, cancelling Expo and extending the Connaught Bridge's lifespan to 2012 to finance tunneling SkyTrain along Commercial Drive is what the citizens of 2012 call "Crazy Talk"

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id...g=5917%2C93046
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9670  
Old Posted: Jul 11, 2012, 10:38 PM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
zoom zoom
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 1,696
The TaxiSaver program is not going anywhere.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/britis...translink.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9671  
Old Posted: Jul 12, 2012, 10:07 PM
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,001
Here's the Translink announcement on its decision to keep the Taxi Saver program on The Buzzer Blog: http://buzzer.translink.ca/index.php...saver-program/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9672  
Old Posted: Jul 13, 2012, 8:10 PM
trippindude trippindude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1
New Bus Shelter for new UBC Trolley Loop

Hi.
First time poster, 10 year forum stalker!

New bus shelters are being installed on University Blvd for the new trolley loop. Thought these were cool. Lots of construction going on at UBC...maybe I'll take some photos.

I took the following shot yesterday.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9673  
Old Posted: Jul 13, 2012, 10:15 PM
tybuilding tybuilding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 681
I came across these pictures looking at photos on Google Earth, old Vancouver buses in Sandon, BC.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9674  
Old Posted: Jul 13, 2012, 11:51 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,426
Cool looking shelter. Thanks for posting!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9675  
Old Posted: Jul 16, 2012, 5:43 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
formerly tin²ium
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 5,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave2 View Post
Stumbled on this, not really on topic in the viaduct thread where the Connaught bridge options of 1982 were discussed a few weeks ago... Sorry Harry, cancelling Expo and extending the Connaught Bridge's lifespan to 2012 to finance tunneling SkyTrain along Commercial Drive is what the citizens of 2012 call "Crazy Talk"

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id...g=5917%2C93046
Wow! Great article in general about businesses who wanted the train underground through Commercial Drive. Fears of businesses suffering/closing down etc. Pretty much the same stuff we hear today.

In other news, on page 67, phone booth local calls went from 10¢ to 25¢ and bus rides were 60¢!

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id...g=969%2C368225
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9676  
Old Posted: Jul 16, 2012, 7:16 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 14,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
Wow! Great article in general about businesses who wanted the train underground through Commercial Drive. Fears of businesses suffering/closing down etc. Pretty much the same stuff we hear today.
It also set up a pissing match between the City and the Province which then resulted in no high density transit-oriented development at Broadway & Commercial.

See the "Introduction" and the "Thrust of the Plan" in the Broadway Station precinct guidelines:

http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/guidelines/B020.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9677  
Old Posted: Jul 16, 2012, 8:32 PM
allan_kuan allan_kuan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,302
I can't say whether those developments from the past are helping us today. Every time I pass by that area I just want to leave it so quick...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9678  
Old Posted: Jul 16, 2012, 8:34 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Whalley, the heart of Surrey, BC
Posts: 2,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
Wow! Great article in general about businesses who wanted the train underground through Commercial Drive. Fears of businesses suffering/closing down etc. Pretty much the same stuff we hear today.

In other news, on page 67, phone booth local calls went from 10¢ to 25¢ and bus rides were 60¢!

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id...g=969%2C368225
I'm more impressed by 17.5% GICs!! In a time where mortgages were 20+%, but then again one could buy a house in Calgary for about $30k. Not sure about Vancouver area at the time. Surrey must've been super cheap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9679  
Old Posted: Jul 16, 2012, 8:46 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Strathcona
Posts: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKaz View Post
I'm more impressed by 17.5% GICs!! In a time where mortgages were 20+%, but then again one could buy a house in Calgary for about $30k. Not sure about Vancouver area at the time. Surrey must've been super cheap.
Inflation was going nuts at the same time though. A quick google says roughly 11% inflation rate.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9680  
Old Posted: Jul 18, 2012, 4:36 PM
Daguy Daguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Salmon Arm, BC
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKaz View Post
I'm more impressed by 17.5% GICs!! In a time where mortgages were 20+%, but then again one could buy a house in Calgary for about $30k. Not sure about Vancouver area at the time. Surrey must've been super cheap.
My parents bought their first home in east Burnaby in late '82 or early '83 and it was about 100K, and almost 40 years old, so the area was definitely more expensive than Calgary. Surrey was definitely cheaper, but I don't know roughly how much.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:48 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.