Quote:
Originally Posted by Eapiwo
I hope I'm not off topic but I'd like to add to the discussion that Amazon is looking for a second city to headquarter in "HQ2" to place 50,000 employees in and their requirements are that they would like to be in a city with a population of 1,000,000+, a large airport, easy access to mass transit, and a good work/life balance. Technically Tucson meets those requirements, barely. For each of the three categories Tucson only barely inches itself into but those are just the requirements unique to this search as I would imagine they'd still want a highly educated workforce which Tuctown lacks. However I think the spirit of the city here is fairly strong akin to that of Atlanta and Los Angeles, we're just much much smaller. I'm not sure how convinced Tucson's leadership is that it can ever win Amazon but it's a fun idea to play with.
If a company were to bring in 50,000 jobs to our city I speculate that - - We'd be approaching 1.3 million people (at the least) residing in Pima County by the 2030 Census
- We'll start to see an increase in wealth and will rank lower on poorest cities list
- Our status as a city would dramatically change, likely in a similar way to Austin.
- Downtown would most definitely see its new tallest towers for the offices alone, as some high rise apartments and hotels would be sure to follow. Likely to rival Phoenix's skyline
- Developing mass transit across the metro would be much more viable
- Sports teams would come and stay
- ADOT still will not have ever considered widening I-10 East of Kino
- Tucson would attract other businesses, high paying jobs
- Incorporation of Vail or other areas? Still seems unlikely however expansion of existing areas seems probable.
While it sure isn't up to the same standards of other cities, Amazon would single handedly brought Tucson up to the ranks of the rest of America's happening cities if they relocated here, which would be a pretty cool sight. I don't think many other small to mid sized American cities would be able to transform to hold a 50,000 new employees but Tucson has prepared for it with the revitalization of downtown and with the exception of I-10, could easily grow by another large sum of people.
https://www.geekwire.com/2017/amazon...t-data-decide/
|
This article, although it is kinda for fun more than anything, knocks Tucson out in their first round:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...arters-be.html. One of the criteria is "strong job growth", the NY Times article states, "Here we’ve cut the contenders by half, keeping those metropolitan areas that have had the best job growth over the last decade, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. Metro areas that have actually lost jobs (
Tucson [emphasis added by me] ; Birmingham, Ala.) and those that have grown more sluggishly are out of the running."
I'll admit when I initially heard about Amazon wanting a new, second, HQ city, I was excited. But I don't see it happening here. Our "mass-transit" is paltry compared to what other cities can offer - and they don't even have dedicated lanes here.
As for this causing the tallest building in Tucson, that may be, but I doubt it would be downtown. According to the NY Times article, "It’s hard to imagine where the Boston region would find the room for a company that will ultimately want up to eight million square feet of office space (the Pentagon, for comparison, has 6.6 million)." - 8 Million square feet of office space. There is no way they could find that space, even with a tall building, in downtown Tucson. The Sears Tower (Willis Tower) in Chicago has 4.56 million square feet. That would be one tall tower, especially compared to the other buildings in Tucson.
As for your observation about I-10 needing to be widened, east of Kino, you are right on that it needs to be widened, but this is actually on AzDOT's radar (
https://www.azdot.gov/planning/trans...study/overview). I've seen a study report - which I am struggling to find right now, that indicates the 2 preferred alternatives could each result in 4-6 lanes, each way, from Alvernon to Kolb.