Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila
Just got back from a few great days in NOLA. Lots of new stuff going on, got to ride the St Claude streetcar, etc. I was a little disappointed to see not much progress cleaning up Canal St, a lot more street-level vacancy than I remember from a few years ago...
My uber driver mentioned something about the south terminal at MSY being retained for Southwest? I can't find anything about that in the news, but it would sorta match Southwest's MO of breaking away from the other airlines and using their own facilities like Hobby, Love, Midway, Oakland.
I could see them taking the D concourse and maybe the C, maybe with some cosmetic upgrades, while the rest of concourses are demolished.
|
There are a lot of vacancies on Canal right now, but most of it is due to building renovations/facade restorations. Particularly in the 900-1000 blocks. It's exacerbated by the retail at the State Palace being closed, despite no firms plans to move forward. The corner retail on the ground floor of the Saenger was supposed to be used for a restaurant, but nothing ever came of that - that would be a big opportunity to improve the area.
As for the airport - officials have been secretive about the whole process, but no plans have been made public to retain scheduled flights at the south terminal. They are obligated to keep the newest part of concourse D in operation due to the federal funding it received and the word was that it would be used to charters. I think they are resistant to the idea of keeping any ops at the south terminal, but given the rate of growth, the north terminal as planned will soon exceed its design capacity, not to mention the lack of direct interstate access.
I do think it would be a very logical solution to keep D open for a few airlines. What I'd propose is converting the concourse C parabola into a check-in hall. Put security in the passage between C and D and then convert the current D check-in rotunda into a post-security food court with a few international gates maybe converting gate D1 into international capable for a total of 11 domestic and 3 flexible international gates. That would provide plenty of room for growth at both terminals.
Another thing that isn't often mentioned is that the south terminal hasn't been able to accommodate any more flights because several of the jet bridges need to be moved to the north terminal in advance. Pretty bone-headed planning IMHO. There's no excuse for an airport that size to be limiting its growth due to lack of facilities.