HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2019, 8:56 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2,093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
Which ones there are being funded with 0% local financing?
All the GO projects with the exception of Union Station redevelopment. This includes the $10+ billion GO electrification plan. All the LRT lines being built in the GTA are to be owned, funded and operated by Metrolinx. The deal that Ottawa got was horrendous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2019, 8:59 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
In what way?
The city builds traffic sewers. At least the NCC has parkland and MUPs around their traffic sewers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2019, 9:00 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
All the GO projects with the exception of Union Station redevelopment. This includes the $10+ billion GO electrification plan. All the LRT lines being built in the GTA are to be owned, funded and operated by Metrolinx. The deal that Ottawa got was horrendous.
I totally agree. We got screwed each time so far with the largest percentage coming from local property taxpayers. This is one of the reasons why our remaining bus system is in a shambles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2019, 10:45 PM
Gat-Train's Avatar
Gat-Train Gat-Train is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by CityTech View Post
Rather than making a Greenbelt 2, I'd actually prefer a plan to replace the existing Greenbelt with a Greenbelt 2 through land swaps.

In the west, sell off the land between Barrhaven/Kanata and Nepean, and use the money to buy up all the land separating Barrhaven & Kanata from Richmond, Manotick, and Carp for a new Greenbelt. That way, we build up the suburbs to be closer to each other instead of extending further outwards. There's so much land in this part of the Greenbelt that it could basically mean the southern and western limits of the urban boundary are not extended again for a century or more.

In the south and the east, however, this is harder to do because much of the Greenbelt lands are undevelopable anyway (due to the airport exclusion zone and Mer Bleue). However, some smaller scale swaps might be possible. In the east, sell off the Greenbelt lands north of the 174 and use the money to extend the Greenbelt to include some of the rural areas between Orleans and Navan. (That actually helps Mer Bleue by keeping Orleans further away from it). In the south, sell off the area between Blossom Park and Findlay Creek and use the money to buy up the land between Findlay Creek/Riverside South and Greely.

Because the sold off Greenbelt land would be more valuable than the land making up the new Greenbelt 2, we could actually have a net increase in the amount of protected land. And we could trade in simple farmland for the opportunity to protect lands like the wetlands between Kanata and Carp. Not to mention, makes the city grow closer together instead of further apart. Win-win-win.
I don't like the idea of giving up existing greenbelt, with the possible exception of the area around Eagleson and Moodie, which is ripe for some TOD following the LRT extensions. Also the area around Hurdman needs development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2019, 11:00 PM
CityTech CityTech is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Westboro, Ottawa
Posts: 1,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gat-Train View Post
I don't like the idea of giving up existing greenbelt, with the possible exception of the area around Eagleson and Moodie, which is ripe for some TOD following the LRT extensions. Also the area around Hurdman needs development.
Thing is, every spot of land in the Greenbelt is just one more spot of land on the fringes of Barrhaven and Stittsville that is turned from farms or nature to houses. Land is going to be used up for the growth of the city, and putting it between existing urban communities makes a lot more sense than expanding outwards.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2019, 2:59 AM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gat-Train View Post
I don't like the idea of giving up existing greenbelt, with the possible exception of the area around Eagleson and Moodie, which is ripe for some TOD following the LRT extensions. Also the area around Hurdman needs development.
We may wait forever to see Hurdman fully redeveloped having been a garbage dump. That is why that strip of land from Brewer Park to Dow's Lake along Bronson has never been developed other than roads, parking lots and sports fields.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2019, 4:59 AM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
The city builds traffic sewers. At least the NCC has parkland and MUPs around their traffic sewers.
That just generates lots of additional vehicle-miles worth of emissions.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2019, 2:38 PM
passwordisnt123 passwordisnt123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ottawa (Centretown)
Posts: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by CityTech View Post
Thing is, every spot of land in the Greenbelt is just one more spot of land on the fringes of Barrhaven and Stittsville that is turned from farms or nature to houses. Land is going to be used up for the growth of the city, and putting it between existing urban communities makes a lot more sense than expanding outwards.
That's not true. Urban sprawl happens because city hall wants it to happen. It's the city that authorizes the expansion of the urban boundary. It's the city that grants permits. It's the city that says where and when those suburban developments happen. The fact that some land is being reserved from development by the greenbelt doesn't mean that an equal parcel of land somewhere else will invariably be used for development. Intensification is a real thing that can and is often used as an alternative to more and more shitty sprawl.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2019, 3:00 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
That just generates lots of additional vehicle-miles worth of emissions.
An inefficient congested road system generates unneeded emissions. So, if we look at from an emissions point of view, we should not wish this city to reach gridlock in order to force people onto transit. Transit should stand on its own merits, something that it has not been achieving lately.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2019, 4:18 PM
CityTech CityTech is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Westboro, Ottawa
Posts: 1,629
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by passwordisnt123 View Post
That's not true. Urban sprawl happens because city hall wants it to happen. It's the city that authorizes the expansion of the urban boundary. It's the city that grants permits. It's the city that says where and when those suburban developments happen. The fact that some land is being reserved from development by the greenbelt doesn't mean that an equal parcel of land somewhere else will invariably be used for development. Intensification is a real thing that can and is often used as an alternative to more and more shitty sprawl.
Intensification is real but it will never amount to 100% of our new construction unless the city's growth slows down considerably.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2019, 9:00 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,529
The city can continue to grow; there just need to be tighter constraints on the form that growth takes, starting with the basics of street layout, transportation hierarchy, and especially land use regulation. It's not just intensification of existing areas; new ones have to be built having shattered the post-war orthodoxy into tiny pieces.

So far, we still ain't doing much of that.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2019, 3:50 PM
rakerman rakerman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 710
The TMP is about more than just trains, but anyway, here's Stage 3

Stage 3 purple from Light-Rail-Transit-Project_Tech-Briefing_20190222_EN by Richard Akerman, on Flickr

The links are
https://ottawa.ca/kanataLRT
and
https://ottawa.ca/barrhavenLRT

The Prince of Wales situation is up in the air. Refurb plans for pedestrians and cyclists, but whether it will ever carry rail again is not clear.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 12:38 AM
DEWLine DEWLine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ottawa-Gatineau
Posts: 196
Well, this is good to see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2019, 3:57 AM
bradnixon bradnixon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by rakerman View Post
The TMP is about more than just trains, but anyway, here's Stage 3

Stage 3 purple from Light-Rail-Transit-Project_Tech-Briefing_20190222_EN by Richard Akerman, on Flickr
Interesting that the map still seems to show the Baseline BRT but doesn't show the Kanata North BRT that is in the current TMP.

I was taking a bus from Kanata North this afternoon and it took 3 light cycles to turn from Carling onto March Rd.

Bus lanes or a median BRT along March Rd (from Teron to Solandt or Terry Fox) and transit priority on Teron Rd would provide a lot of benefit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2019, 4:35 AM
OCCheetos OCCheetos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradnixon View Post
Interesting that the map still seems to show the Baseline BRT but doesn't show the Kanata North BRT that is in the current TMP.

I was taking a bus from Kanata North this afternoon and it took 3 light cycles to turn from Carling onto March Rd.

Bus lanes or a median BRT along March Rd (from Teron to Solandt or Terry Fox) and transit priority on Teron Rd would provide a lot of benefit.
I'd guess it's because Baseline has a completed study and is just waiting on funding.

The Cumberland Transitway isn't on that map either, and neither is the Western half of the Baseline BRT.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2019, 1:59 PM
Multi-modal Multi-modal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by DEWLine View Post
Well, this is good to see.
FYI, this is fan-made by rakerman, and hasn't been put-out by the City
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2019, 2:03 PM
OCCheetos OCCheetos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Multi-modal View Post
FYI, this is fan-made by rakerman, and hasn't been put-out by the City
That particular map was published by the city during the Stage 2 technical briefing back in February I believe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2019, 2:16 PM
Multi-modal Multi-modal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by OCCheetos View Post
That particular map was published by the city during the Stage 2 technical briefing back in February I believe.
Ahh, you're right - my bad
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2019, 5:32 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 9,499
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2019, 6:01 PM
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 4,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Interesting. One thing to note is the scales are different on the 4 maps. For the darkest green:
* Drive   = 91.6 - 96.3%
* Transit = 31.6 - 50.0%
* Walk = 17.2 - 46.1%
* Bike = 6.1 - 15.3%
As a result, the darkest green on bike is the same as the 2nd and 3rd darkest colours on walk, is below the lightest colour on Transit and well below the lightest colour on Drive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:31 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.