HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2161  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 6:43 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by micheal View Post
I wonder what the drainage is like? it looks like everything would drain to the center in a rain storm
It's right beside a river so it would be fairly straightforward.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2162  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 6:51 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by micheal View Post
I wonder what the drainage is like? it looks like everything would drain to the center in a rain storm
Unlike the maroons who designed Sky dome, zee German Civil Engineers would have taken into account that it rains and you have to deal with water!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2163  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 7:04 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,265
HKS designed Apogee Stadium in Texas. It has 31,000 seats and was completed in 2011 for $78 million! I realize our construction costs are way higher, but imagine what we could get for triple that amount.



http://www.hksinc.com/places/univers...pogee-stadium/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2164  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 7:26 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
HKS designed Apogee Stadium in Texas. It has 31,000 seats and was completed in 2011 for $78 million! I realize our construction costs are way higher, but imagine what we could get for triple that amount.



http://www.hksinc.com/places/univers...pogee-stadium/
Also notice in the far endzone "Mean Green"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2165  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 8:17 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,065
^ it doesn't have a roof. May explain the budget. Actually, it would explain the budget - a lot.

In all honesty, you guys need to be looking at what quality level of Stadium Winnipeg ended up with. Take the total Winnipeg construction cost at the year the contract was signed. Add about 5% for annual construction inflation, to get to 2014 dollars.

I don't think the budgets between the two projects are that far off in 2014 dollars. And what ever difference there is, will allow you to get a handle on how much *more* extravagant the Regina stadium will be versus Winnipeg.

Last edited by drew; Mar 14, 2014 at 8:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2166  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 8:51 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
^ it doesn't have a roof. May explain the budget. Actually, it would explain the budget - a lot.

In all honesty, you guys need to be looking at what quality level of Stadium Winnipeg ended up with. Take the total Winnipeg construction cost at the year the contract was signed. Add about 5% for annual construction inflation, to get to 2014 dollars.

I don't think the budgets between the two projects are that far off in 2014 dollars. And what ever difference there is, will allow you to get a handle on how much *more* extravagant the Regina stadium will be versus Winnipeg.
At that inflation it was $224,910,000 in 2014 dollars. Now we have a budget minus site work of $250,000,000 so little over $25,000,000 more extravagant. $25M is a lot of money, but not really when in this case.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2167  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 8:53 PM
micheal micheal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
^ it doesn't have a roof. May explain the budget. Actually, it would explain the budget - a lot.

In all honesty, you guys need to be looking at what quality level of Stadium Winnipeg ended up with. Take the total Winnipeg construction cost at the year the contract was signed. Add about 5% for annual construction inflation, to get to 2014 dollars.

I don't think the budgets between the two projects are that far off in 2014 dollars. And what ever difference there is, will allow you to get a handle on how much *more* extravagant the Regina stadium will be versus Winnipeg.
actually the construction cost index has been holding steady at an annual escalation rate of 2.4%
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2168  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 8:54 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by North_Regina_Boy View Post
At that inflation it was $224,910,000 in 2014 dollars. Now we have a budget minus site work of $250,000,000 so little over $25,000,000 more extravagant. $25M is a lot of money, but not really when in this case.
Where did you get that $25 million figure and does not every stadium have site work?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2169  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 9:06 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Where did you get that $25 million figure and does not every stadium have site work?
Yes everyone does, and I read it in today's CBC's article.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2170  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 9:12 PM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by North_Regina_Boy View Post
Yes everyone does, and I read it in today's CBC's article.
The prep you are mentioning better also include digging the hole and everything because $25 mill for what was done would be highway robbery.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2171  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 9:24 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan View Post
The prep you are mentioning better also include digging the hole and everything because $25 mill for what was done would be highway robbery.
I would certainly hope so as well. The first stuff they have done should be well under $1M
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2172  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 9:32 PM
micheal micheal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 415
at an annual construction cost index of 2.4%
70 million more would be spent on the Regina stadium.
there's really gonna be no comparison between the two.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2173  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 10:08 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by micheal View Post
at an annual construction cost index of 2.4%
70 million more would be spent on the Regina stadium.
there's really gonna be no comparison between the two.
Winnipeg's actual cost was $204 million.

In any event the comparison is still there. Climate, seating, roof, location, etc. etc.

There is no need to compare and wonder the budgets of European Stadiums or American NFL/college stadiums when your best comparison (like it or not) is several hundred kilometres down the road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2174  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 10:28 PM
Rottie Rottie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary formerly Regina
Posts: 226
I agree with Drew. I think Regina's stadium is going to be very similar to IGF, which is not a bad thing at all but with a better roof system which is a good thing. Can't wait to see it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2175  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 10:29 PM
micheal micheal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
Winnipeg's actual cost was $204 million.

In any event the comparison is still there. Climate, seating, roof, location, etc. etc.

There is no need to compare and wonder the budgets of European Stadiums or American NFL/college stadiums when your best comparison (like it or not) is several hundred kilometres down the road.
OK buddy you win.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2176  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 11:55 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,265
I agree that IGF is the best comparison. Regina's will be a little better, but similar. Regina has the advantage of a somewhat higher budget, a more experienced design team and the latest technologies and designs (it will be 5 years newer).

BTW I have been to IGF and it is fantastic IMO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2177  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2014, 1:12 AM
Migs Migs is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Regina, Sk, Canada
Posts: 3,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
Winnipeg's actual cost was $204 million.

In any event the comparison is still there. Climate, seating, roof, location, etc. etc.

There is no need to compare and wonder the budgets of European Stadiums or American NFL/college stadiums when your best comparison (like it or not) is several hundred kilometres down the road.
What is the actual cost of the Regina stadium going to be after it's completed? Remember that the $278M price tag does not include the millions the Riders are going to invest in leasehold improvements. Add to that our architect is actually a stadium designer and will be able to deliver the best bang for our buck. IGF is a great stadium but will be a 2010 Ford Fusion compared to Regina's 2014 Audi A4. Both similar cars yet very different.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2178  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2014, 3:08 AM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Is IGF good with wind? Does the design mitigate winds sweeping through from one end zone to the next? Maybe the peg doesn't have the wind issues we have but that has to be the most annoying thing about Taylor Field. Address the wind, no blind spots, and somewhat of a roof and whatever gets built will be just fine.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2179  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2014, 3:04 PM
UPP UPP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Regina, Canada
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
Is IGF good with wind? Does the design mitigate winds sweeping through from one end zone to the next? Maybe the peg doesn't have the wind issues we have but that has to be the most annoying thing about Taylor Field. Address the wind, no blind spots, and somewhat of a roof and whatever gets built will be just fine.
Cupholders. That's pretty much the only thing that matters.

I kid...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2180  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2014, 3:35 PM
Migs Migs is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Regina, Sk, Canada
Posts: 3,774
If the rumours are true about the Feds funding $10M towards the BMO Field reno are true, there are going to be some right pissed off people in Sask.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:04 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.