Quote:
Originally Posted by the shadow warrior
Yes Kevin yes tell the truth . 31 events in Winnipeg for the new bombers stadium. This is with a multi decades old Blue Bombers CFL club.
|
ok, Paul (?); 31 large events in a year is a realistic number (plus many smaller community events). I don't see anything surprising about that. It is the nature of such a stadium. That is why it is important to go with a low cost design. BMO Field in Toronto usually has 20,000 plus spectators for Toronto FC and makes a profit. It doesn't have as many events as the Rogers Centre which was a money loser, but the BMO Field was built in a low-cost manner and that is why it can make a profit with fewer events.
If you remember there were a couple of weeks of setup time for the Paul McCartney concert. About 6,000 temporary seats were setup. A stadium takes the place of setting up temporary seats and tearing them down, it also eliminates the need for temporary portable toilets (the thought of using portable toilets alone would keep me away from concerts).
The football/soccer stadiums that lose a significant amount of money are the iconic ones. Winnipeg will have a beautiful stadium but it will probably lose money. The Rogers Centre went bankrupt several years ago and was sold for $25 million dollars (a fraction of its construction cost). We all know about the Montreal Olympic Stadium situation. The renovated BC Place looks amazing but will probably lose a significant amount of money. If Regina builds an iconic stadium it will also lose tons of money. However, there are many US university stadiums and low-cost MLS stadiums that are doing fine. You need to compare apples and apples - if you don't then nobody will listen to you, and you yourself should step back and re-consider your motives. We aren't talking about a couple of billion dollars for the Commonwealth Games.