HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2023, 7:36 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
It's old found some archived pages on their website around 2017-2018 with those images. But the 2015 inquiry also mentioned 100,000 sq m while the most recent ones are talking about 125-150,000 at max buildout..
I'm not sure they are. The document says:

4.1 Project Size, Scale and Functional Planning Site: approx. 6,200sm

Site Master Planning: approx.. 125-150,000sm gfa

Schematic Design: approx. 75,000sm
Occupancy:

Office Space for Government of Canada (Private / Special Purpose, Semi-Private / Public Facing)
– approx. 65,000sm

o Generic Office Space: approx. 40,000sm (approx 10% public facing component)
o Special Purpose Office Space: approx. 25,000sm
o Approx 3,000 work points for 6,000 ftes
o Approx 15 departments (ranging from 2,000-15,000sm each)

Ground Floor: Retail – approx. 3,000sm

Parking: approx. 1-2 levels of underground bike parking, car parking and loading (approx.200 cars, 15 van/truck loading spaces, 1000 bikes / end of trip facilities).


So to me, that reads that the site could theoretically hold 125-150,000sm, but the Government is only looking for around 75,000 of space, including 65,000 office and 3,000 retail.

I guess it'll be clearer once there's more work done.

It's worth noting that it's the QE viewcone that affects the site, which has in the past been allowed to be breached. I'm not sure whether that might be possible here, and if so, what height they could reach before the next viewcone impacts the site.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2023, 8:35 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,739
Here's the view cone for 320 Granville's application back in 2012. It lists:

12.2 Granville Bridge MP - 128.76
E1 Cambie Bridge - 112.19
9.1 Cambie @ 10th - 119.54
9.2.2 Cambie @ 12th - 118.01

https://web.archive.org/web/20191105.../views_000.pdf

The Harbour Centre top obstructs a lot into the Cambie Bridge E1 viewcone so that would probably be "too tall"



https://vancouver.ca/home-property-d...cted-view.aspx
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2023, 9:05 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,739
Here's some of the drone footage they used to create that 3D model of Sinclair Centre

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2023, 10:39 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,654
I fully expect this tower to punch through the viewcones, but not to be some supertall or anything crazy like that.

I'd expect something similar in height to the Stack or maybe a big shorter.

*This is all just a wild ass guess.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2023, 11:56 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,870
Really hope your right! Such a tower doesn't need to be the tallest in the city, something between 150m and 170m would be amazing for the location (heck, even something between 130 to 150 would be refreshing).
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 3:49 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,739
The newest renderings of the wood frame tower



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 4:03 AM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,750
Do you have any source for where these are from?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 4:16 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
Do you have any source for where these are from?
It's just a public document from PSPC. I was just curious if someone runs a story about it if they will finally credit SSP
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 5:44 AM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Good lord.

It’s impossible to tell for sure, but according to this rendering, it looks like at least one (but possibly two) of the four historic buildings would likely be demolished while a bizarre set of balconies (or something) will be grafted onto the beautiful facade of another.

Last edited by Prometheus; Jun 26, 2023 at 5:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 6:44 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,854
Yikes! Sure, I like wood-frame buildings as much as anybody, but here is a disaster (IMHO ). It clashes with the existing period architecture, sort of like apples and shoe polish. No, please, not here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 6:51 AM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,750
I'm guessing that design is two square/rectangular wings connected at the central core, not an 'L'. The north side being more or less mirrored of what is shown on the south with the Customs building on the north corner largely intact. I doubt losing the Public Building will cause anyone to lose sleep especially since the streetscape there drastically needs the improvement. Hopefully they are serious about removing the overpass to Granville Square.

As for those balconies, that's probably just a modeling mistake copying the one from the 2nd floor to those above.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 8:14 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,464
So long as the Customs Warehouse is fine, I'm happy. The Federal building can go duck itself.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 11:31 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,194
Ugh, that's one fugly proposal. I hope it doesn't fly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 3:18 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,739
I just noticed that the lobby/plaza area on the corner (where the federal building is) would have columns that extend all the way to the height of the clock tower/post office building. You can also see it notches back which I assume sort of matches where it goes back to meet the Customs Examining House building.

I think that white overhang over the Customs Examining House is being used to mimic the old roofline? Because it seems like they will lop off the top of it and just keep the facade? It also seems like that the section of the building over the Customs building is actually taller than whatever is over the towers. You can see the roofline of something behind the public elevator core section.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 3:50 PM
TwoFace's Avatar
TwoFace TwoFace is offline
Dig-it
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Downtown
Posts: 956
Can't say anything good about that redevelopment plan, some things need to be just left alone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 7:23 PM
seamusmcduff seamusmcduff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prometheus View Post
Good lord.

It’s impossible to tell for sure, but according to this rendering, it looks like at least one (but possibly two) of the four historic buildings would likely be demolished while a bizarre set of balconies (or something) will be grafted onto the beautiful facade of another.
Yeah that's what I'm seeing too. A complete tragedy if those facades are replaced with some random columns and glass.

I don't necessarily have a problem with facadism if done well, but these buildings are absolutely worth saving in some fashion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 7:33 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,301
This is awful. People need to rise up to protest this.

I knew they were going to destroy the heritage elements.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 7:49 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,739
I guess that thing on top of the Customs building was a recent addition which is why they are lopping it off.



https://searcharchives.vancouver.ca/...rd-cpr-station
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 8:22 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,464
TIL the Customs roof is actually an extension... yup, that's a goner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2023, 8:54 PM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,750
That's from the original Sinclair Centre project in the 80s.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
I think that white overhang over the Customs Examining House is being used to mimic the old roofline? Because it seems like they will lop off the top of it and just keep the facade? It also seems like that the section of the building over the Customs building is actually taller than whatever is over the towers. You can see the roofline of something behind the public elevator core section.
Do you mean the R.V. Winch building on the west corner? I don't see any of the Customs Examining building on the north corner in those renders.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:27 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.