Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaws
Jagr won two cups and in both instances he wasn't the best player on his own team. Messier won 6, and with 2 of them no one name Gretzky or Lemieux was around.
|
Winning cups =/= good player. Lots of bad players have Cup rings.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaws
Durability in as far as the type of game Messier played vs Jagr's game. Jagr uses his size effectively to shield the puck and gain position but he's doesn't fit the classic definition of the power forward.
|
Right, but Jagr is currently doing this during a faster and younger era than Messier was during his. There are far fewer players Jagr's age still playing than there was when Messier was nearing the end of his career. And Jagr's a plus player doing it at the end of his career unlike Messier.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaws
Jagr is an incredibly skilled player and deserves to squeak in to the top 10 players ever but i don't associate winning with him like I do with oother players like Gretzky, Messier, Yzerman, Crosby, Sakic, Howe, Richard......
|
There's a really big difference between being good and winning, though, which I think you're conflating. Two players who I think are two of the greatest players of all time (Bure & Lindros) never won cups, let alone the legions of other players that never won. Hasek's the greatest goalie of all-time but he didn't win as much as Roy or Brodeur because he was stuck on
awful teams. It's a team sport after all, and we're comparing individuals and not the teams they were on.
It's impossible to measure the age-old Canadian value of
intangibles and
leadership, which is fine, but I think they get extremely overrated in many circumstances. There's so much more to this discussion than merely
leading and
winning. On raw talent and skill and ability i'd take Jagr any day over Messier.