HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #721  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 4:36 AM
rypinion's Avatar
rypinion rypinion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Exchange, Winnipeg
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
okie dokie.
Why would they be in Calgary? Isnt JRI going to lure them all to Winnipeg?
Agrium (almost all crop inputs) - Calgary

Richardson (19 elevators, attached crop input locations, some shipping terminals, and a large oat processing business) - Winnipeg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #722  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 5:34 AM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
The retail portion is the question "almost all crop inputs" - depends if this includes the seed component of the business.

I don't see why Richardson would have to add positions in Winnipeg to add a bit of terminal space to their contingent of terminals and deal with a few more elevators in west central sask.

75% of Glencore income (if you include their share of xstrata) comes from metals and mining (13% Ag and 12% energy). Glencore is primarily a mining company. Coincidentally, BHP, Vale, RioTino, Mosaic, Potash corp all have offices or canadian headquarters in Sask. Glencore is a $90B company and likely has big plans far beyond grain and far beyond Saskatchewan. They aren't going to up and move the regional office somewhere because the CEO's girlfriend got a job in Calgary. We have a good shot of retaining a regional office as long as the key decision makers stay in Switzerland and aren't faced with the problem of making more money than they can possibly spend in Regina or Saskatoon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #723  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 12:59 PM
micheal micheal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 415
Glencore to aquire Viterra for $6.1B,and make Regina its Head Office

Nice news that Regina will be Glencore's North American Head Office. More jobs in the future as company expands.

http://www.leaderpost.com/business/G...197/story.html

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bus...143609756.html

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...te-canada.html

Last edited by micheal; Mar 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #724  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 1:26 PM
rypinion's Avatar
rypinion rypinion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Exchange, Winnipeg
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
The retail portion is the question "almost all crop inputs" - depends if this includes the seed component of the business.

I don't see why Richardson would have to add positions in Winnipeg to add a bit of terminal space to their contingent of terminals and deal with a few more elevators in west central sask.

75% of Glencore income (if you include their share of xstrata) comes from metals and mining (13% Ag and 12% energy). Glencore is primarily a mining company. Coincidentally, BHP, Vale, RioTino, Mosaic, Potash corp all have offices or canadian headquarters in Sask. Glencore is a $90B company and likely has big plans far beyond grain and far beyond Saskatchewan. They aren't going to up and move the regional office somewhere because the CEO's girlfriend got a job in Calgary. We have a good shot of retaining a regional office as long as the key decision makers stay in Switzerland and aren't faced with the problem of making more money than they can possibly spend in Regina or Saskatoon.
19 elevators is a significant number. Extra terminals to handle the grain from those new elevators is significant. There is a lot of new grain to be moved and sold, and people are required to do those things - it's not trivial.

...But, I've tried to stay out of this since the company I worked for became involved (originally when it was just Glencore in the news I was fairly vocal on here).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #725  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 5:27 PM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by rypinion View Post
19 elevators is a significant number. Extra terminals to handle the grain from those new elevators is significant. There is a lot of new grain to be moved and sold, and people are required to do those things - it's not trivial.

...But, I've tried to stay out of this since the company I worked for became involved (originally when it was just Glencore in the news I was fairly vocal on here).
I don't know jack about the grain business but since you are or used to be with JRI - help me out.
So your trading floor has to take hedge postions on 25 as opposed to 20 contracts to counter the extra grain bought at the 19 locations each day for any given commodity. Your logistics people have to arrange a few more 20 car spots for the west central area of sask - with the same rail logistics people they deal with daily anyway. Your sales people have a few thousand tonnes more canloa to sell to the same buyers (actually easier for your own crushers to source product now).
All grain companies will be devloping sales teams to deal with board grains that they never had to before - this is because of the CWB not because of Viterra.
You may deal with pulses in west central that your buyers don't have experience with and you may need a new regional manager for facilities....
I just don't see a large resource increase because of a modest expansion to existing business lines? what am I missing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #726  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 5:40 PM
rypinion's Avatar
rypinion rypinion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Exchange, Winnipeg
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
I don't know jack about the grain business but since you are or used to be with JRI - help me out.
So your trading floor has to take hedge postions on 25 as opposed to 20 contracts to counter the extra grain bought at the 19 locations each day for any given commodity. Your logistics people have to arrange a few more 20 car spots for the west central area of sask - with the same rail logistics people they deal with daily anyway. Your sales people have a few thousand tonnes more canloa to sell to the same buyers (actually easier for your own crushers to source product now).
All grain companies will be devloping sales teams to deal with board grains that they never had to before - this is because of the CWB not because of Viterra.
You may deal with pulses in west central that your buyers don't have experience with and you may need a new regional manager for facilities....
I just don't see a large resource increase because of a modest expansion to existing business lines? what am I missing?
I'm just saying that my impression is that it is more than modest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #727  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 6:19 PM
rypinion's Avatar
rypinion rypinion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Exchange, Winnipeg
Posts: 1,396
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bus...143609666.html

Quote:
In a divvying up of assets in the immediate post-wheat-board era, Richardson International agreed to pay the new owners of Viterra, Glencore International, $900 million for 19 elevators, boosting the Winnipeg family-owned business's share of the market to 34 per cent from 25 per cent.
25% market share to 34% is a 26.5% increase in size.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #728  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 7:35 PM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by rypinion View Post
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bus...143609666.html



25% market share to 34% is a 26.5% increase in size.
9% increase in market share - puny.

(actually its a 36% increase in size - not modest.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #729  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 8:41 PM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,630
First of all, you're starting to sound like a dick. What's up with the pissing match?

Secondly, it's clear that an increase from 1 quarter to 1 third of the market is a pretty significant increase. The folks at JRI believe it's significant, and believe that this will result in positive growth for the company, including at the head office.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bus...143609666.html

Both Glencore and Richardson will have about 1/3 of the market each. In the short term at least, this seems like good news for Winnipeg and Regina.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
9% increase in market share - puny.

(actually its a 36% increase in size - not modest.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #730  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 8:55 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,517
its costing a billion dollars for that market share...of course its significant.

i admire treesplease's optimism that cutting a company in half and making it a regional office of a multinational will result in 5-10 jobs lost, but i think he might be in for a surprise.

this is not good news for regina....being a legitmate head office location and a subsidiary are very different.

the only good news is that the city didnt lose the company completely....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #731  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 9:18 PM
Dougler306 Dougler306 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Regina
Posts: 453
Saskatchewan still poised to lead the nation in growth according to RBC bank
Good times ahead!!!!!!! even with the loss of viterria

http://www.thestarphoenix.com/busine...982/story.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #732  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 9:47 PM
micheal micheal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
its costing a billion dollars for that market share...of course its significant.

i admire treesplease's optimism that cutting a company in half and making it a regional office of a multinational will result in 5-10 jobs lost, but i think he might be in for a surprise.

this is not good news for regina....being a legitmate head office location and a subsidiary are very different.

the only good news is that the city didnt lose the company completely....
I think this is good news for regina. This is going to be the north american head office for Glencore's agricultural operations. i think thats pretty significant. As the company expands it will mean more head office jobs here. As stated in Glencore's media release, Glencore said it will consolidate its operations in regina as it looks to expand more in Canada and the U.S.

More in Glencore's company release:

http://www.glencore.com/documents/Ac...on_Release.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #733  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 10:14 PM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Authentic_City View Post
First of all, you're starting to sound like a dick. What's up with the pissing match?

Secondly, it's clear that an increase from 1 quarter to 1 third of the market is a pretty significant increase. The folks at JRI believe it's significant, and believe that this will result in positive growth for the company, including at the head office.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bus...143609666.html

Both Glencore and Richardson will have about 1/3 of the market each. In the short term at least, this seems like good news for Winnipeg and Regina.
Sorry for not being clearer for you - I was actually conceding that it was more than a modest expansion and correcting a math mistake.
I was having a civil discussion with rypinion and then you jump in with,
"you're starting to sound like a dick"? Did I hurt your feelings somewhere? ease up on the coffee dude!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #734  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 10:23 PM
rypinion's Avatar
rypinion rypinion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Exchange, Winnipeg
Posts: 1,396
Ah yes, I did do my math wrong. 36%. I'll be even busier than I thought
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #735  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 11:57 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
Thunder Bay might have an idled elevator come back online with this deal, if it goes through. Unions are upset, but unions are always upset.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #736  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2012, 6:17 PM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rueannatta
Posts: 2,597
Ottawa most unfaithful city in Canada: Website


By Derek Abma, Postmedia News March 22, 2012 12:02 PM


Read more: http://www.canada.com/life/Ottawa+mo...#ixzz1ps3yD8ju
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #737  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2012, 8:27 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by micheal View Post
I think this is good news for regina.
personally, i dont trust multinational corporations....they will pull the plug in a heartbeat given a better opportunity....its happened here in winnipeg many times.

smaller markets have a difficult time competing no matter how good the economy is....there is way less security being a subsidiary than a true head office.

do you really believe they will run their NA operations from regina forever?....as soon as they get a foothold in the US that market will be split off....or the NA operations will be run form there instead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #738  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2012, 8:34 PM
socialisthorde socialisthorde is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefourthtower View Post
Ottawa most unfaithful city in Canada: Website


By Derek Abma, Postmedia News March 22, 2012 12:02 PM


Read more: http://www.canada.com/life/Ottawa+mo...#ixzz1ps3yD8ju
huh?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #739  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2012, 8:46 PM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by socialisthorde View Post
huh?
It's a normal occurrence in the Regina threads...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #740  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2012, 11:51 PM
micheal micheal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
personally, i dont trust multinational corporations....they will pull the plug in a heartbeat given a better opportunity....its happened here in winnipeg many times.

smaller markets have a difficult time competing no matter how good the economy is....there is way less security being a subsidiary than a true head office.

do you really believe they will run their NA operations from regina forever?....as soon as they get a foothold in the US that market will be split off....or the NA operations will be run form there instead.
i guess will have to waite and see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.