HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #761  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2007, 8:04 PM
j korzeniowski's Avatar
j korzeniowski j korzeniowski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: logan square, chicago
Posts: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbotnyse View Post
http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?c4

the first 8 buildings there have at least a tip above 300m. Point being, there are very few cities in the world that have more.
true, but while close, 300m =! 1000ft.

hey, you gonna change your name to cmegroupnyse?
     
     
  #762  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2007, 8:06 PM
cbotnyse cbotnyse is offline
Chicago Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 1,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by j korzeniowski View Post
true, but while close, 300m =! 1000ft.

hey, you gonna change your name to cmegroupnyse?
does 300m not = 1000 feet?

haha, and CBOT will always stay!
     
     
  #763  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2007, 8:07 PM
ih8spires ih8spires is offline
Marina City
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 120
^I think he is counting ATT corporate center and possibly the 1000 plus foot mystery tower we have heard about.
     
     
  #764  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2007, 8:12 PM
j korzeniowski's Avatar
j korzeniowski j korzeniowski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: logan square, chicago
Posts: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbotnyse View Post
does 300m not = 1000 feet?

haha, and CBOT will always stay!
just googled to be sure and it is 984 ft and change. as i said, it is close, but not quite the 1,000' mark. still, the rest of the world uses the metric system and probably uses the 300m benchmark so we're still good

Quote:
Originally Posted by ih8spires View Post

^I think he is counting ATT corporate center and possibly the 1000 plus foot mystery tower we have heard about.
click his link, by his standards (300m) we do have 8 buildings over that mark. or, at least, we will.
     
     
  #765  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2007, 8:12 PM
cbotnyse cbotnyse is offline
Chicago Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 1,620
ok I guess 300m does not equal 1000 feet.

So let me revise my statement.....we have 7 buildings peaking above 1000 feet, and I do not take that for granted!!!

Last edited by cbotnyse; Jul 19, 2007 at 8:20 PM.
     
     
  #766  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 1:21 AM
headcase's Avatar
headcase headcase is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: East Village, Chicago
Posts: 455
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdrianXSands View Post
70% of building in this city are better than Aon. why is it that 1000' buildings are like MAGIC to so many people?
BS -- Aon is a great building very much under rated.

But this is all off topic, so I will leave it at that.

SSDD
__________________
He was constantly reminded of how startlingly different a place the world was when viewed from a point only three feet to the left.
     
     
  #767  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 1:42 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Honte - thank you for the reply !

Quote:
Originally Posted by honte View Post
I've been debating the glass parking garage with a number of architects I know. We have been trying to come up with ideas that would have been more suitable / pleasing.... and no, shoving all of the parking within the inner core of the building, with units surrounding it, would not have been realistic.

...snip...
I will check next time I'm downtown at night ( or in December ), but I think that the reason Marina towers parking is not so glaring and garish is that it is much dimmer, would it be possible to tone down the light ? put in shades to keep it from shining directly on the ( frosted ? ) glass ?

This will detract from the floors above which will look very dark in comparison.

Any bets on when we will see the first movie with a car crashing throught the glass and into the river ?
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #768  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 1:44 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ No problem. Thanks for your photos and posts too, by the way.

Marina City is the ultimate anomaly, and really is a testament to Goldberg's genius. It broke every rule in the book, and even breaks today's rules. When you boil it down, let's face it: The residential towers are 60-stories of nothing but balconies and parking! Two of the most detested aspects of today's residential high-rises.... And he was so confident, he did two of them right next to each other!

I think the secret to Goldberg's parking situation is the fact that the cars are recessed pretty deeply, allowing the sculptural concrete spirals to become dominant in the composition. He was smart to paint the metal balconies and rails a dark color, so that the other elements could come to the foreground. And, as you say, the darkened areas toward the center of the building are where the cars are, which keeps them out of sight somewhat. It's a kind of solid-void art piece that is so powerful, I even forget there are cars in there a lot of times.

The other part of Marina City that is so wonderful is that it wasn't really designed to be an ultra-luxury, glitzy place. It was a mini-city, a place designed to draw common people downtown to live. I think this ideology helps it get away with showing off the cars. You see the cars coming and going, the entrances to the ramps are not disguised, there are cars driving all over the plaza. The activity and living quality of the towers are a part of the composition.

I'm just trying to point out that Trump and Marina City are a tough comparison, to me at least. Any time you try to do something that is ultra-minimalist, such as Trump, all the fine details get brought to the foreground. The garage at Trump is especially distracting to us because it's such a tightly produced composition, something that is supposed to be swank, refined, and beautiful at all times of day.

I think the good news is that a scrim system or some kind of other interior treatment similar to the painters' tarps could be added at a later time to Trump to adjust the visibilty of the garage, if it turns out to be really off-putting. Since Donald owns the hotel still, I expect him to have a keen eye focused on its public appearance at most times, so this might very well happen. But I don't expect them to tone-down the lighting, since safety and protection of luxury automobiles will probably be critical to the owners. I also wouldn't underestimate SOM - they might already have another trick up their sleeves that we aren't seeing yet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by headcase View Post
BS -- Aon is a great building very much under rated. But this is all off topic, so I will leave it at that.
Thank you. I second BOTH of those comments.

Last edited by honte; Jul 20, 2007 at 2:07 AM.
     
     
  #769  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 2:47 AM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
NEW YORK | CHICAGO
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,532
Chicago will have 6 supertalls, none of the BS spire crap. This is CHICAGO, not a city scrambling for attention by BSing the height of its buildings.

AON is underrated, I fell in love with it at a dinner party at the 'tute.

Trump is a mediocre building at best, but ist the only supertall REALLY U/C now in Chicago (until Waterview gets going)...and...its polarizing. So of course theres going to be a lot of discussion about it. News of this parking garage is disturbing, but not unexpected to me, as Trump is generally a tool and doesn't actually understand anything about design.
__________________
My: Skyscraper Art - Diagrams - Diagram Thread
     
     
  #770  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 2:58 AM
APPRAISER APPRAISER is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alliance View Post
Chicago will have 6 supertalls, none of the BS spire crap. This is CHICAGO, not a city scrambling for attention by BSing the height of its buildings.

AON is underrated, I fell in love with it at a dinner party at the 'tute.

Trump is a mediocre building at best, but ist the only supertall REALLY U/C now in Chicago (until Waterview gets going)...and...its polarizing. So of course theres going to be a lot of discussion about it. News of this parking garage is disturbing, but not unexpected to me, as Trump is generally a tool and doesn't actually understand anything about design.
HERE!! HERE!!! ALLIANCE!!

Just look at all these cities building supertalls! Alot of them have a stupid spire on top just to make it over 1,000'.
I think its BS!
     
     
  #771  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 3:03 AM
b-s b-s is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alliance View Post
Chicago will have 6 supertalls, none of the BS spire crap. This is CHICAGO, not a city scrambling for attention by BSing the height of its buildings.

AON is underrated, I fell in love with it at a dinner party at the 'tute.

Trump is a mediocre building at best, but ist the only supertall REALLY U/C now in Chicago (until Waterview gets going)...and...its polarizing. So of course theres going to be a lot of discussion about it. News of this parking garage is disturbing, but not unexpected to me, as Trump is generally a tool and doesn't actually understand anything about design.
^^ What he said.
     
     
  #772  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2007, 4:27 AM
Chicago3rd Chicago3rd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cranston, Rhode Island
Posts: 8,695
Brightens Wabash up when looking north:




And that dark hole is filled from Wacker by the Hilton:






From this evening.
__________________
All the photos "I" post are photos taken by me and can be found on my photo pages @ http://wilbsnodgrassiii.smugmug.com// UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED and CREDITED.
     
     
  #773  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2007, 2:21 AM
JuniorReb JuniorReb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 227
I found out about the GOLD Column. It is REJECTED. That was not the final product. It was a field test piece and was rejected on the spot. The final product will be Stainless steel, to match the windows. 37th Floor is poured out and the 38th, will be going this coming week, as well at the jumping of the Tower cranes.
     
     
  #774  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2007, 2:33 AM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
NEW YORK | CHICAGO
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,532
Thanks JuniorReb

...my God...how could the old windbag ever consider gold columns.

The glass on this building is a giant photoshop effect. Its even bad from far away. it might look great reflecting the blank blueness of the sky, especailly because of the color, but at street level, it both blurs and distorts. Horrible.
__________________
My: Skyscraper Art - Diagrams - Diagram Thread
     
     
  #775  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2007, 2:40 AM
Rocket1 Rocket1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alliance View Post
The glass on this building is a giant photoshop effect. Its even bad from far away. it might look great reflecting the blank blueness of the sky, especailly because of the color, but at street level, it both blurs and distorts. Horrible.
Those close-up photos make it look like Trump's trying to outdo Aqua for a wavy effect.
     
     
  #776  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2007, 2:50 AM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
NEW YORK | CHICAGO
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,532
..without actually doing the effect.
__________________
My: Skyscraper Art - Diagrams - Diagram Thread
     
     
  #777  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2007, 2:54 AM
Untitled's Avatar
Untitled Untitled is offline
Back in the Windy City
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 232
^^ Yeah, how does this happen? Do they just not know how it's going to look? Are they using cheap glass?

Tourists are going to love it, people who have to walk by it every day are going to hate it.
     
     
  #778  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2007, 3:15 AM
JMininger JMininger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 320
Is it this wavy when viewing the tower in person in certain light conditions? Having not seen it in person, I have no idea. If so, then OMG. However, I have seen photos exaggerate the waviness effect in glass before. I have also seen photos minimize the effect.
     
     
  #779  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2007, 7:53 AM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,647
Thumbs down

˜˜Í∫∫Ω©å∫∫∫åååßßÍÍÍlowiiiijjj|||
سط حدود

Last edited by Tom Servo; Oct 31, 2007 at 1:20 AM.
     
     
  #780  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2007, 2:01 PM
cbotnyse cbotnyse is offline
Chicago Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 1,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alliance View Post
Thanks JuniorReb

...my God...how could the old windbag ever consider gold columns.

The glass on this building is a giant photoshop effect. Its even bad from far away. it might look great reflecting the blank blueness of the sky, especailly because of the color, but at street level, it both blurs and distorts. Horrible.
you are finding new things everyday to hate about this tower. i dont get it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Untitled View Post
^^ Yeah, how does this happen? Do they just not know how it's going to look? Are they using cheap glass?

Tourists are going to love it, people who have to walk by it every day are going to hate it.
I live next door and look at it everyday and never thought twice about the reflection off the glass. Not only do I not hate it, I think it looks awesome. you guys are
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:06 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.