Quote:
Originally Posted by hwy418
Definitions according to the MTO Structural Manual are:
Underpass: the major road goes under a lower category road (i.e. Maitland U/P)
Overpass: the major road goes over a lower category road (i.e. Kirkwood O/P)
Subway: the road goes under the railway (i.e. O-Train tracks at Hunt Club)
Overhead: the road goes over the railway (i.e. 417 over the O-Train tracks)
I have a handy little picture to illustrate further, but I can't seem to find how to attach a file (not a web link).
|
Leave it to the MTO to come up with definitions no one else would use.
I'm used to the idea of a "subway" being a pedestrian crossing in the UK under a road or railway, but the idea of it being a road going under a railway doesn't really match anyone's notion of a subway.
And I'm pretty sure most people if asked what an 'overhead' is and told that it involves a railway would guess that it refers to the railway going over the road, not the road over the railway.
As to the under/overpasses, the problem with the MTO's definition is it requires one to make an assessment of the nature of both roads being crossed before one can arrive at the correct term. Sure, easy enough when one is a freeway and the other isn't, but what to do about something like the Airport Parkway - Hunt Club Rd crossing? Which is the higher category road? Does that change if the Airport Parkway is twinned? If it was, would both carriageways have to be on the same structure? At least mine works in both ways: the Airport Parkway is an overpass of Hunt Club and Hunt Club is an underpass of the Airport Parkway. Lord knows what the MTO themselves do in southern Ontario where freeways cross freeways, such as the ten-lane Hwy 407 crossing over the ten-lane Hwy 410.
But hey, rationale thought was never a strong point over at the MTO.