Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States


Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Posted Dec 23, 2009, 3:23 AM
Chase Unperson's Avatar
Chase Unperson Chase Unperson is offline
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Papa Songs.
Posts: 4,329
New York the most miserable state

This from the NYT and a bunch of researchers that correlated subjective responses about quality of life versus objective data such as climate, length of commute, cost of living etc....


Published: December 21, 2009
In this season given to tidings of comfort and joy, word has come that we New Yorkers are the sad sacks of the United States. This is something of a surprise. Sure, we complain a lot. Grumbling could qualify as the official state sport. But are we really the unhappiest of them all?

"Maybe NYC needs to get serious about fun and not just serious about work and making a buck. ... How do we let our hair down and skip down the street?"

It seems so, judging from a study by two economics professors, newly published in Science magazine. The academics — Andrew J. Oswald, of the University of Warwick in Britain, and Stephen Wu, of Hamilton College in Clinton, N.Y. — examined piles of data, tossed them into a research Cuisinart and came up with a guide to American happiness, ranked by state. On the smiley scale, New York landed on the bottom.

Dead last?

“I’m sorry about that,” Professor Oswald said by phone from Warwick.

It’s rather dismal. If there were a National Happy League, we’d be the New Jersey Nets. We’re No. 51 out of 51. The District of Columbia was included in the list as if it were a state. It made it all the way to No. 37 despite the handicap of having Congress in its midst.

At least New Yorkers can take comfort in knowing that their immediate neighbors in Connecticut (No. 50) and New Jersey (No. 49) are not appreciably happier.

A remarkable aspect of this study is that Professors Wu and Oswald concluded that we are not gruntled without even having asked what we think of Albany, Donald Trump or Thom Browne suits. Rather, they focused on two sets of information.

One was a survey of 1.3 million Americans done over four years by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which asked people about their health and how satisfied they were with their lives. Those self-assessments were stacked against “objective indicators” borrowed from researchers at U.C.L.A. They included state-by-state variances on quality-of-life gauges like climate, taxes, cost of living, commuting times, crime rates and schools.

When the two sets were blended, the economists discovered that the subjective judgments closely tracked the objective ones. In other words, people knew what they were talking about when they said if they were happy or not. Americans who described themselves as satisfied tended to live in places where the quality of life was good by most standards — where the sun shone a lot, the air was reasonably clear, housing didn’t leave you busted, traffic wasn’t too fierce and so on.

“We were actually surprised that the match was as strong as it was,” Professor Wu said in a phone interview. “The strength of the correlation is very, very high.”

The state-by-state rankings were not a priority, he said. But they are what has inevitably drawn the most attention. In case you were wondering — and you know you were — the Top 10 states on the happiness scale are, in descending order, Louisiana, Hawaii, Florida, Tennessee, Arizona, Mississippi, Montana, South Carolina, Alabama and Maine.

Louisiana? Uh, didn’t it have that huge hurricane, what’s her name, a few years back?

Yeah, Katrina is a complication, the professors said. Some of their data predated the storm. But the hurricane is not all that defines Louisiana. Like nearly all the other states in the Top 10, it is warm. (Surprisingly, sunny California is way down in the ranks, No. 46.)

It falls to a New Yorker to ask how it is, if this is such an unhappy place, that more people are living in the city than ever before: an estimated 8.4 million. “That’s a very sensible point,” Professor Oswald said. Many people, he said, do indeed think of states like New York and California as “marvelous places to live in.”

“The problem,” he said, “is that if too many individuals think that way, they move into those states, and the resulting congestion and house prices make it a nonfulfilling prophecy.”

Not to be unkind, but some states that made the Top 10 are among the poorest in the country. Are people there truly happy, or are they wearing “What, me worry?” smiles.

More important, might contentment be overrated? Seriously, isn’t restlessness, even outright discontent, often a catalyst for creativity?

We’re from the Harry Lime school. If you’ve seen the film classic “The Third Man,” you will remember that character’s admonition: “In Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance.

“In Switzerland they had brotherly love. They had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock.”
Reply With Quote
Old Posted Dec 23, 2009, 3:24 AM
Chase Unperson's Avatar
Chase Unperson Chase Unperson is offline
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Papa Songs.
Posts: 4,329
OOPS I Should have titled it NY is the most miserable state and not NYC is the most miserable state. Can FFLINT edit that for me, thanks.
Reply With Quote
Old Posted Dec 23, 2009, 5:00 PM
| BRAVO | | BRAVO | is offline
Closed account
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 786
So much for quality of life rankings... or maybe ignorance is bliss?
Reply With Quote
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 9:40 PM
pesto pesto is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,546
Harry Lime's history is a little confused but you get the idea. Why would anyone believe that NYC is happy, relaxed, comfortable with the way things are? It is full of over achievers and people on the make and they usually get there by caring more about doing things right or better rather than just good enough. They are tought to satisfy because they know you can do better.

The old philosophical question: who is happier: Socrates or the pig? Life makes for different kinds of people. Socrates chooses NY (or the like); the pig chooses somewhere else (nothing personal, it's just a metaphor).
Reply With Quote

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States
Forum Jump

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 3:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.