Quote:
Originally Posted by aerogt3
I don't think you understand how big SD is and how long it would take people to get between two points using mass transit. You need stations close to people to attract ridership. But stations that frequently make for long journey and/or many connections with bus, private car, etc. It make sense in core SD but not in the metro region as a hole.
You are going to spend a shitload of money to provide a service no better than just running buses along freeway HOV lanes, with feeder buses taking people to destinations. The difference is running buses on existing infrastructure is hundreds of times cheaper than building an entire rail system.
A rail system big enough to get major ridership running 15 minutes is something that only happens in very large, very dense cities. You are dreaming on this.
Barcelona has the transit you are looking for. Have a look at it and SD on google maps at the same scale....
|
I understand the size and geography of San Diego quite well, and, I also understand your point concerning the ridership tradeoffs for access versus added travel time. Transportation Planning 101.
Though, I respectfully disagree with you. Granted, San Diego has physical challenges and bridging its barriers will cost buttloads of funding. Moreover, the San Diego regional funding machine has given a cold shoulder to Rail Transit. Though, where there is a will, there can also be the means.
IMO, San Diego is now, or will soon be, of sufficient size to merit significant expansion. Take a look at the previously provided population stats above and there's an obvious Trent. Further, projections are available through the year 2050 or 2060. Huge numbers.
I'd agree that the Trolley is a better model for denser areas and more closely spaced stops and a different model would be necessary for connecting the far distant locations... Oceanside, Escondido, San Diego, etc. What that model is, is debatable.