HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > General Discussion


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2017, 2:32 PM
VarBreStr18 VarBreStr18 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 734
Quote:
Originally Posted by cornholio View Post
Let me put on my logic hat.

I think you just showed your cards. Your agenda here is not to get advise but rather to give it...

And why would someone give advice like this when not solicited? In sneaky way on-top of it.
Looks to me GM never asks advice about the market. It just spinned off that way.
GM is comfidant about the market. GM just want opinion about which project to buy , that's all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2017, 4:57 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by GilmoreStation View Post
There is no way you will ever see any 2-bedroom condo that is less than 5 year old near transit in the 500's ever again in Burnaby (unless if it's super close to a cemetery)

Nor will you ever see any 1-bedroom in the 300's for buildings under 5 year old near skytrain in Burnaby ever again
By that logic, diversify and buy two. If your logic holds true on the first statement and these are safe investments, then having two separate buildings in two different (ish) areas is effectively diversifying your portfolio and reducing your risk.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2017, 7:44 PM
GilmoreStation GilmoreStation is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 465
That would be great, except that I won't qualify for that much mortgage. So I will have to determine which one of the two will generate faster returns in the medium term (5-8years).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 12:04 AM
rickvug rickvug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by GilmoreStation View Post
That would be great, except that I won't qualify for that much mortgage. So I will have to determine which one of the two will generate faster returns in the medium term (5-8years).
I'm sorry, this is just incredibly naive and dangerous for your personal finances. The fact that you look to be stretched to qualify says it all. Despite past experience in Vancouver might tell you, real estate is not some get rich scheme where "anyone can do it". It is tied to all sorts of macro and micro-economic factors that one should try to understand.

Buy a home primarily to live in. If you must invest in real estate have a long time horizon and keep a careful eye on your cap rate (rate of return). Your worst case should be that you're earning a steady rate of return and you can simply hold on to it. We're coming out of a stretch of amazing returns at a time when interest rates are rising (for real this time!). In 5-8 years interest rates will almost certainly be a good deal higher than they are now, bringing prices down with it. Affordability might stay the same or actually get worse while prices come down. People will just be paying a higher percentage of their mortgage in interest. If you're looking at supply and demand dynamics you can also see a large surge in starts in the past year. This is great and hopefully will moderate price growth for the health of the region as units complete.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted May 12, 2017, 2:55 PM
GilmoreStation GilmoreStation is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 465
As long as you can get the unit rented, your tenant will pay off your mortgage for you. And it's mostly a passive investment too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted May 12, 2017, 3:21 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by GilmoreStation View Post
As long as you can get the unit rented, your tenant will pay off your mortgage for you. And it's mostly a passive investment too.
So you think being a landlord is a more passive investment than owning something liquid like a stock index?
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted May 12, 2017, 3:32 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
So you think being a landlord is a more passive investment than owning something liquid like a stock index?
And he's assuming rent will cover mortgage payments + strata fees + property tax, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted May 29, 2017, 5:40 PM
SkyboxInvestment SkyboxInvestment is offline
Ex-Banker. R/E Insider
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 33
Brentwood has shot up and it looks like until a wave of completions in 2021 hits the markets it will continue to rise a bit, though SOLO and higher end Amazing Brentwood (delayed) projects are going for $900/sq ft.

Fact is vacancy is low and quality tenants are having a tough time finding a good longterm home. Burnaby Metro/Brentwood rates are $1600-1800 for under 5 year old high rises which covers up to $450K in mortgage at current 2.2% var 5 year rates.

Even lower end developers like Thind is pricing Lumina at $850/ft at the lowest levels.

Disclosure:
Investor, have units in Burnaby
Also insider on developments such as Lumina Brentwood
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted May 29, 2017, 6:07 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyboxInvestment View Post
Fact is vacancy is low and quality tenants are having a tough time finding a good longterm home. Burnaby Metro/Brentwood rates are $1600-1800 for under 5 year old high rises which covers up to $450K in mortgage at current 2.2% var 5 year rates.

Disclosure:
Investor, have units in Burnaby
Also insider on developments such as Lumina Brentwood
Disclosure, you won't get those rates when you complete
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted May 30, 2017, 1:03 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyboxInvestment View Post
Fact is vacancy is low and quality tenants are having a tough time finding a good longterm home. Burnaby Metro/Brentwood rates are $1600-1800 for under 5 year old high rises which covers up to $450K in mortgage at current 2.2% var 5 year rates.
Does it cover strata and property taxes, though? What about regular maintenance of the unit?

And what will interest rates be in 5 years? Are you willing to be they'll be the same as they are now?
__________________
In the heart of a busy metropolis skyscrapers are a vivid reminder of the constant yearning of the human spirit to rise to God
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted May 30, 2017, 3:26 AM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by GilmoreStation View Post
That would be great, except that I won't qualify for that much mortgage. So I will have to determine which one of the two will generate faster returns in the medium term (5-8years).
Also be aware of taxable consequences that start making your returns lower than expected:

Buying a property for immediate resale upon completion will result in business income which 100% of the profit is included into your income, as opposed to 50% of the capital gain. You are engaging in an adventure or concern in the nature of trade. CRA is successfully reassessing a lot of property flips as business income lately by focusing on the facts (i.e. a taxpayer who has a family of 4 buys a one bedroom condo and claims it was his principle residence; taxpayer buys a home then say he had to sell it immediately due to a feng shui violation in its design - even though he had performed a thorough walkthrough of the home prior to closing).

Also be aware that the federal government has hinted at increasing the capital gains inclusion rate from 50% to 75% for homes not designated as a principle residence. Expected for 2018 or future years, the taxable consequences of such a change can make your investment start looking like a GIC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted May 30, 2017, 6:57 AM
WBC WBC is offline
Transit User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Metrotown/Downtown
Posts: 786
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
And he's assuming rent will cover mortgage payments + strata fees + property tax, etc.
Actually, when you put all things on paper, even with a 30 year mortgage the rent does not cover mortgage payments, property tax, strata fees, insurance, repairs, etc. It's just that people in general glamorize this and don't fully account for expenses and eyeball the whole mortgage payment = rent.

In addition, rent is fully taxable income which many apparently "forget" which means that you should subtract 20-40% from rent to pay the CRA. And if you rent the place the sale is subject to capital gain tax.

So to sum it up you will be running your investment at a loss for many years to come praying that interest rates not go up, that tenants don't ruin your place, that the building does not run into a large special levy and hoping that properties continue to appreciate at 5-10% a year indefinitely...Isn't it just easier to invest with Madoff?

And sure if your bought in 2003 and sold this year, you made a lot of money...But you could have made a lot of money on Nortel shares too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2017, 8:50 AM
BlueVancouver BlueVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 5
The bubble has gotten larger and larger. When.. not if, the investor money decides to stop due to unforseen circumstances, they will unload units like we've never seen before. Most people that buy condos these days are investors looking to make a quick buck or rent out their units. Normal working people can no longer afford even 1 bedroom units anymore unless they live in Surrey or Langley.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2017, 9:44 AM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
Please use the real estate thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=193748
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2017, 12:24 AM
szechuansean szechuansean is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueVancouver View Post
The bubble has gotten larger and larger.
https://globalnews.ca/news/2915301/c...ices-in-china/

7 times more visa applicants, 7 times more people coming from china, 7 times more capital flowing in the the not to distant future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2017, 1:44 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by szechuansean View Post
https://globalnews.ca/news/2915301/c...ices-in-china/

7 times more visa applicants, 7 times more people coming from china, 7 times more capital flowing in the the not to distant future.
News that's only 15 months old...
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2017, 2:17 AM
szechuansean szechuansean is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
News that people may have missed or be unaware of.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2018, 7:47 PM
GilmoreStation GilmoreStation is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 465
It looks like Gilmore Place's first tower will be selling at the same time Solo District's third tower is selling. How does this two towers compare and which one should an investor buy?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2018, 8:04 PM
excel excel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,482
.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2018, 8:07 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,097
Neither unless they like to throw away money?
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > General Discussion
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.