HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Projects & Construction Updates


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 8:36 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosso Corsa View Post
That's the point
Unless the panel meant this as a positive comment
Haha I chuckled at that as well, a little odd of a comment.

Hopefully there is a recommendation report posted in the next few days which will give us a little bit more information to what the city wants the developer to come back with.

I cannot see any major hurdles assuming the developer is serious, which based on the location and scope I would guess they are looking to start asap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2016, 3:24 PM
kaiserLDN kaiserLDN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: London
Posts: 385
http://news.buzzbuzzhome.com/2016/04...umber-bay.html

Here is a building in Humber Bay in Toronto that looks similar in style to the proposal in London.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2016, 4:52 PM
GreatTallNorth2 GreatTallNorth2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,452
Remember that the Design Panel has no power whatsoever. They are an advisory board who offer advice to the developer and the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2016, 5:58 PM
goldandnavy goldandnavy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: London
Posts: 25
I wonder if it's the same architect, the two buildings seem almost identical
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2016, 6:24 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldandnavy View Post
I wonder if it's the same architect, the two buildings seem almost identical
I would bet it is, the design is almost identical...too bad our proposal wasn't 50 stories
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2016, 1:59 AM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 5,764
Reusing the same designs saves a ton of money. It's the reason you see twin tower projects all the time. If you look at the recent towers Old Oak has put up on Southdale and up at Hyde Park they are identical designs. Would not doubt for a second the same architect and engineering firms are being used for the London tower as for the project in the GTA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2016, 5:22 PM
Rosso Corsa Rosso Corsa is offline
Downtown
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Toronto
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaiserLDN View Post
http://news.buzzbuzzhome.com/2016/04...umber-bay.html

Here is a building in Humber Bay in Toronto that looks similar in style to the proposal in London.
Great find Kaiser
Passed it the other day and was going to mention it too but slipped my mind

The design is the same even down to the angling of the balconies

Graziani + Corazza are the architects for Lago in Etobicoke, but, no mention of them in the 515 Richmond St. proposal, nor on Graziani's website
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2016, 6:16 PM
Dither City's Avatar
Dither City Dither City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto Ontario.
Posts: 81
Looking through the business proposal name SRM architects comes up repeatedly look at renderings.
http://www.london.ca/business/Planni...2016-11-16.pdf

http://srmarchitects.ca
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2017, 2:25 AM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 5,764
Public meeting coming up on zoning change for Old Oak's tower on Richmond St.

http://www.london.ca/business/Planni...ing-Notice.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted May 7, 2017, 11:17 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 5,764
Staff recommend approval of this project. But as usual the NIMBY's are against it. The stated reasons this time? Shadows and blocking your view and ducks/geese/birds networking.

You live in the downtown core of a city and you think you have the right to complain if a new tower cast a shadow on your high rise which in turn casts a shadow on others.

http://www.lfpress.com/2017/05/07/ci...n-to-the-other
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted May 7, 2017, 11:28 PM
GeneralLeeTPHLS's Avatar
GeneralLeeTPHLS GeneralLeeTPHLS is offline
Midtowner since 2K
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Midtown Toronto
Posts: 5,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by jammer139 View Post
Staff recommend approval of this project. But as usual the NIMBY's are against it. The stated reasons this time? Shadows and blocking your view and ducks/geese/birds networking.

You live in the downtown core of a city and you think you have the right to complain if a new tower cast a shadow on your high rise which in turn casts a shadow on others.

http://www.lfpress.com/2017/05/07/ci...n-to-the-other
These residents need to get off their high horse...a city like London is finally returning to growth (in the highrise department I mean) and you don't want your view ruined? It's just something they should expect..cities grow up, your view may change, but more people will be starting out a chapter of their lives in a building like this...opportunities arise for those who want to live downtown, or for those centered around condo's. (interior designer, gym-condo-coach)

“An apartment building, as constructed, as Old Oak is requesting, absolutely destroys our beautiful cityscape, our view from our balcony, our peaceful surroundings from the 10th floor, and blocks our sunshine from the south,” states a letter in the report from Julia and Murray Pretti, who live in the Kent Street tower.
__________________
"Living life on the edge"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 3:44 AM
ldoto's Avatar
ldoto ldoto is offline
Londoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London,Ont
Posts: 1,322
515 Richmond St. Green light by staff.

City staff give thumbs up to one highrise, thumbs down to the other

Yes London I think We are on the right Path to great things!!!!

515 Richmond St


22-storey tower on Wellington Street at Wolfe Street, across from the park.





Auburn Developments isn’t giving up on its plan to build a highrise next to Victoria Park.

City staff is not supporting a pitch by the developer to build a 22-storey tower on Wellington Street at Wolfe Street, across from the park.

But the builder will revise its proposal in time for a meeting Monday of city council’s planning and environment committee in hope of winning favour, said Steve Stapleton, vice-president Auburn.

“We want to build this and we want to do it in the short term,” he said.

“We believe this is not just good for Auburn but for the city. We want to do our part to revitalize the core. We truly believe intensification is good for a city core.”

The Auburn proposal would require the demolition of two office buildings, of five and two storeys, to make way for a 151-unit tower. The developer would add 227 parking spaces above ground and below.

The highrise would abut the stately historic Wolfe Street streetscape. City staff recommend rejecting it because it isn’t consistent with the heritage look in the Woodfield neighbourhood and would result in “over intensification of the site,” meaning too many people living there.

“Buildings on Wolfe Street and Wellington Street (north of the subject site) have a consistent heritage character,” the staff report says.

Some Londoners object to a tower of that scale opposite Victoria Park, adding it will give what is now an open space a “sense of enclosure,” the report says.

“The proposed development, while including a high quality building that would contribute to achieving several of the city of London’s planning objectives, is not an appropriate form of development on the subject property.”

Kate Rapson, chairperson of the Woodfield Community Association, said the city staff report sums up the sentiment in the heritage district.

“It’s a great report. We agree with the city on this one. (The highrise) is not in keeping with the heritage district and there is not enough space between low-rise neighbours and the highrise,” she said.

Auburn has held two public meeting with Woodfield residents to get their feedback on the development. If the company submits a new plan Monday, it would be the third reiteration of the proposal that has already shrunk to 22 storeys from 25.

“This is a challenging one, overall it is not as though they missed on all points. It is a beautiful building, well-designed and modified from the original proposal to take into account the community,” said Michael Tomazincic, manager of current planning.


Rendering of proposed highrise at 515 Richmond St.

At the same meeting, a proposed 32-storey highrise at 515 Richmond St. to be built by Old Oak has been given a green light by staff.

The 101-metre tower would be built on one hectare of land and have 175 one- and two-bedroom units.

“Both of these proposals show how confident the building community is in the downtown, these are two core area proposals that show there is a market here,” Tomazincic said.

Old Oak plans to take down part of a commercial arcade fronting on Richmond so the tower would front on the streetscape, with a plaza in front of it. There would still be a commercial plaza fronting on Richmond, albeit smaller.

A 14-storey apartment building at 155 Kent St. and a 12-storey retirement residence at 170 Kent St. abut the site to the north.

After notices were sent to neighbours some objections were filed based on the shadow the tower would cast, traffic congestion and vehicular access to parking and loss of privacy, a city report says.

“An apartment building, as constructed, as Old Oak is requesting, absolutely destroys our beautiful cityscape, our view from our balcony, our peaceful surroundings from the 10th floor, and blocks our sunshine from the south,” states a letter in the report from Julia and Murray Pretti, who live in the Kent Street tower.

“There is also a network of duck/geese/birds which call our area home! We are interested in their activity and future!”

ndebono@postmedia.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 3:57 PM
GreatTallNorth2 GreatTallNorth2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,452
That Old Oak project is probably the one I am most excited about. It's a good height, great design and Old Oak actually builds these projects for a living. They are not like Farhi who just puts up proposals.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 4:29 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatTallNorth2 View Post
That Old Oak project is probably the one I am most excited about. It's a good height, great design and Old Oak actually builds these projects for a living. They are not like Farhi who just puts up proposals.
Me too seems like this should press on fairly quickly, much like Tricar you typically know its going to happen fast.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 4:36 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,875
please tell me the tall one isn't going to be grey. nearly everything in london is grey. The sky is grey 90% of the days from October-April.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 11:41 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 5,764
The question for Old Oak is when.

They are on the 4th floor of tower 2 at Hyde Park. Should be done by end of 2017 with tenants moved in. The question is do they stay there and build tower 3 in 2018 or pause and move to Richmond St. My guess is they will build tower 3 next in 2018 with a start on Richmond St. in 2019.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSlippery519 View Post
Me too seems like this should press on fairly quickly, much like Tricar you typically know its going to happen fast.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2017, 10:40 AM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 5,764
Old Oak says in this article that they plan to start their 33s story on Richmond next Spring.

http://www.lfpress.com/2017/06/25/ap...dons-southwest
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2017, 10:18 AM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 5,764
Some of the stores are moving out in March to make way for demolition based on this article.

http://www.lfpress.com/2017/10/24/lo...mmittee-briefs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2017, 2:08 PM
GreatTallNorth2 GreatTallNorth2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,452
After the Rygar project, this is the project that excites me the most. Old Oak doesn't build concrete crap like the other developers. The design is really nice, it's a good height and a great location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2017, 5:50 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,080
So this development is being mention the free press article about down town parking http://www.lfpress.com/2017/10/24/ri...out-of-the-mix

Is there not a simply solution for adding parking downtown? When you build a new development ask that 1-2 floors be designated to pay per use parking, all big cities have tons of parking options within residential and hotels in addition to surface lots.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Projects & Construction Updates
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:48 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.