Thread naming convention: NAME | HEIGHT | FLOORS | STATUS

[Mike K.]

Each project in this section should have its own thread, and please use the following syntax for creating new project threads:

NAME | HEIGHT | FLOORS | STATUS

NAME - full project name
HEIGHT - the building's height in feet
FLOORS - the floor count of the building
STATUS - U/C, Proposed, Completed


Examples of thread titles:

Project A | 350 ft | 28 fl | U/C

Project B | 400 ft | 35 fl | Proposed

Project C | 223 ft | 20 fl | Appoved

[Mike K.]

[CITY] NAME | HEIGHT | FLOORS | STATUS

NAME - full project name
HEIGHT - the building's height in meters
FLOORS - the floor count of the building
STATUS - U/C, Proposed, Completed


Examples of thread titles:

[City/Suburb] Project A | 350 ft | 28 fl | U/C

[City/Suburb] Project B | 400 ft | 35 fl | Proposed

[City/Suburb] Project C | 223 ft | 20 fl | Appoved

[Dougall5505]

do we really have to put the floor height in meters? we can do feet right?

[Nutterbug]

Originally Posted by Dougall5505

do we really have to put the floor height in meters? we can do feet right?

That text was cut-and-pasted from the Vancouver BC (ie. Canadian) section, without correction. Use the units of your choice.

[MarkDaMan]

are the rest of the PDX threads going to be moved over?

[Mike K.]

Yes, but I'm having a hard time finding the project heights, floors and status' since the info is not always readily available in the threads for some reason. Another forumer offered to help with those so I'll have them moved over soon.

[mcbaby]

will seattle get a thread?

[Mike K.]

Seattle will be getting its own section soon. In the Northwest forum there's a thread on SSP:Local Seattle you can check out.

[Dougall5505]

the parenthesis around the city seem a little cumbersome, from now on no parenthesis needed.
example: Vancouver | project name | height | floors | status

everyone ok with that?

[pdx2m2]

I've been out of town for some weeks and now this site seems crazy and complicated to use. Am I the only person that finds this weird?

The old site required skipping across things from Seattle that I didn't want to read although it was easy to scan and one stop shopping...Now things are compartmentalized and it isn't at all friendly..or maybe I just don't understand how to use this place yet.

[Dougall5505]

if you want to discuss the new changes go here: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=139394

[Okstate]

Would anyone be interested in making a thread about the projects that have recently been completed if for nothing more than reference sake? There are tons of separate threads on here for projects that have been completed & are now dying a slow death.