Quote:
Originally Posted by meh_cd
I think the "lighting" you see is actually some vapor trails forming near the back of the plane. The plane is also banking to the left, so any light would be hitting the underside at this point. Also makes sense that the plane would be slightly blurry on a 12+ year old digital camera.
Aside from that, I suppose that artifact around the plane is pretty suspicious. Problem is, if you open it up in paint, parts of the WTC have that same outline with the artifact. I don't have photoshop to open it up and check. It should be pretty easy to check for photo manipulation there since those lines are obvious to the naked eye already.
I'm still undecided about this one. And kind of a silly thing to keep going back and forth about. This will be my last post on the topic.
|
I have put the image in Photoshop, and can see that the resolution of the B-2 is not the same as the Twin Towers. And with the plane banking to the left, I would expect the lower left of the plane, just underneath the cockpit to be lit, rather than be darker in shadow.
Which again leads me to conclude that the picture is Photoshopped.
However, don't get me wrong, I don't dispute that a B-2 actually did a fly-by. I am just expressing my opinion on that particular photo as posted. And I agree, it's not something worth arguing over, so like meh_cd, this will be my last post on this subject.