HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #921  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 10:52 PM
Knight Hospitaller's Avatar
Knight Hospitaller Knight Hospitaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Greater Philadelphia
Posts: 2,154
The problem isn't free trade. It's "dumping," which artificially lowers the price of steel and aluminum (long enough to greatly reduce American production capacity). I see this as a negotiating tactic since NAFTA countries were exempted and other countries can negotiate on a case by case basis -- ergo, non-dumpers aren't going to get hit as hard (if at all).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #922  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 11:10 PM
iheartphilly iheartphilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight Hospitaller View Post
The problem isn't free trade. It's "dumping," which artificially lowers the price of steel and aluminum (long enough to greatly reduce American production capacity). I see this as a negotiating tactic since NAFTA countries were exempted and other countries can negotiate on a case by case basis -- ergo, non-dumpers aren't going to get hit as hard (if at all).
Yeah, I get that.

International trade left to its natural course without tariffs, quotas, or other restrictions.

Regardless, if a foreign company decides to sell steel at a lower price, that's there pejorative. I know we cry "unfair," but if US companies choose not to buy foreign steel, they can always buy US steel and the dumping would slow or reverse. But, there is voracious appetite for lower cost steel at the expense of US steelmaker, yes. However, the choice is with the company buying the steel. They can support US steel manufacturers or not, but again US companies that use steel must survive and be profitable so as I've said earlier no one is forcing US companies CEOs to buy foreign steel, but capitalism and profits can be a beast. Plus, I think it ultimately hurts US downstream companies that rely on it to make other commodities like vehicles, beer kegs (aluminum), and other U.S. industries that heavily use steel and aluminum.

Maybe if there's an economist on this board, s/he can chime in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #923  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 11:40 PM
Knight Hospitaller's Avatar
Knight Hospitaller Knight Hospitaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Greater Philadelphia
Posts: 2,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartphilly View Post
Yeah, I get that.

International trade left to its natural course without tariffs, quotas, or other restrictions.

Regardless, if a foreign company decides to sell steel at a lower price, that's there pejorative. I know we cry "unfair," but if US companies choose not to buy foreign steel, they can always buy US steel and the dumping would slow or reverse. But, there is voracious appetite for lower cost steel at the expense of US steelmaker, yes. However, the choice is with the company buying the steel. They can support US steel manufacturers or not, but again US companies that use steel must survive and be profitable so as I've said earlier no one is forcing US companies CEOs to buy foreign steel, but capitalism and profits can be a beast. Plus, I think it ultimately hurts US downstream companies that rely on it to make other commodities like vehicles, beer kegs (aluminum), and other U.S. industries that heavily use steel and aluminum.

Maybe if there's an economist on this board, s/he can chime in.
Not an economist, but a finance major before going to law school. This is mainly about China. The Chinese companies are not making a business decision to sell for less. Manufacturing is at a pace that exceeds demand for product. They are selling at a loss in some cases, but being propped up by the government. Google what the WTO found with respect to Chinese solar panels. The same thing is going on with steel/aluminum. Transshipment though other countries from China means the numbers are worse than they at first appear.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #924  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2018, 12:32 AM
iheartphilly iheartphilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight Hospitaller View Post
Not an economist, but a finance major before going to law school. This is mainly about China. The Chinese companies are not making a business decision to sell for less. Manufacturing is at a pace that exceeds demand for product. They are selling at a loss in some cases, but being propped up by the government. Google what the WTO found with respect to Chinese solar panels. The same thing is going on with steel/aluminum. Transshipment though other countries from China means the numbers are worse than they at first appear.
I don’t disagree. Their tactics are well-known. The problem is our appetite for their cheap steel. The question is whether this political move really has any real net positive (or negative)benefits to the economy, or just the steel makers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #925  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2018, 6:48 PM
SEFTA's Avatar
SEFTA SEFTA is offline
PhillyPholly
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by City Wide View Post
I believe that 3001 JFK is the site controlled by Amtrak, who last year requested proposals to help find a developer, then the developer would-------anyways, it didn't strike me that there is a mad dash to get this built. It would be built over active tracks.
It is the key connection between what will be Schuylkill Yards and the 30th Street Station District. In the back of my mind I'm thinking of a particular company. Iconic with lots of room to grow. In both directions. Sort of a Transbay Terminal complex extending to Arch Street.

Last edited by SEFTA; Mar 10, 2018 at 9:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #926  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2018, 8:14 PM
iheartphilly iheartphilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,625
http://www.philly.com/philly/busines...-20180314.html

This looks like the cookie cutter reporting from the other cities that were visited.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #927  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2018, 8:33 PM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartphilly View Post
http://www.philly.com/philly/busines...-20180314.html

This looks like the cookie cutter reporting from the other cities that were visited.
So far, so good.
Having Amazon could really improve the skyline.
50,000 Jobs filling 6½ Comcast Center towers is very important for the city and the region in a substantial way!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #928  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2018, 11:32 PM
Kidphilly Kidphilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 899
https://www.som.com/projects/philade..._district_plan


some great images in this link, some seem updated at least to me (let the picture play through)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #929  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2018, 11:34 PM
iheartphilly iheartphilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kidphilly View Post
https://www.som.com/projects/philade..._district_plan


some great images in this link, some seem updated at least to me (let the picture play through)
Nice...I hope Amazon has seen this and knows about it. If I was an Amazon employee looking to transfer or a perspective employee, this would be a factor in applying for a position.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #930  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2018, 12:23 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartphilly View Post
Nice...I hope Amazon has seen this and knows about it. If I was an Amazon employee looking to transfer or a perspective employee, this would be a factor in applying for a position.
This does appear to be an updated series of illustrations!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #931  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2018, 11:48 AM
Boku Boku is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kidphilly View Post
https://www.som.com/projects/philade..._district_plan


some great images in this link, some seem updated at least to me (let the picture play through)
This is for the 30 Street District Plan, which is separate from Schuylkill Yards. None of these renderings are new.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #932  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2018, 12:37 PM
Groundhog's Avatar
Groundhog Groundhog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boku View Post
This is for the 30 Street District Plan, which is separate from Schuylkill Yards. None of these renderings are new.
Agreed, the long shot down the River doesn't even have CHOP's Roberts Center in the rendering.
__________________
You must construct additional pylons.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #933  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2018, 2:35 PM
JohnIII JohnIII is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 221
6.5 Comcast Buildings; hmmm, that would fit pretty much what is planned in Schuylkill Yards; a 1200' and 1050' and others between 500 to 800'. Something to think about; ready made; built in plans
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #934  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2018, 5:30 PM
PHLJD13 PHLJD13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 13
It's confirmed; they've been here. On the extreme DL, apparently.

https://www.phillymag.com/news/2018/...scouts-philly/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #935  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2018, 5:38 PM
Kidphilly Kidphilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 899
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHLJD13 View Post
It's confirmed; they've been here. On the extreme DL, apparently.

https://www.phillymag.com/news/2018/...scouts-philly/
pretty sure I saw their parade of vans at the Ritz the Friday of snomageddon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #936  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2018, 5:42 PM
Groundhog's Avatar
Groundhog Groundhog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 339
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHLJD13 View Post
It's confirmed; they've been here. On the extreme DL, apparently.

https://www.phillymag.com/news/2018/...scouts-philly/
They didn't meet with Kenney, is that something to be concerned about? I know reading the tea leafs is a futile exercise, but I can't help it.
__________________
You must construct additional pylons.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #937  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2018, 6:14 PM
Kidphilly Kidphilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 899
Quote:
Originally Posted by Groundhog View Post
They didn't meet with Kenney, is that something to be concerned about? I know reading the tea leafs is a futile exercise, but I can't help it.


actually I would actually say that may have been a good thing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #938  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2018, 4:20 PM
JohnIII JohnIII is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 221
Some great news has been show in the last month at the Philadelphia Airport; I was unsure exactly if this should go in the Philadelphia Metro Section or this one however I placed it there and here because this can shed some light on Amazon being in Philadelphia.

The City of Philadelphia buys the Henderson Tract near the Philadelphia International Airport just south of Cargo City. The Henderson Tract is in Tinicum Township, Delaware County. The goals of the Philadelphia International Airport is to turn this into a Freight Distribution Center. Amazon and FedEx were in attendance.

If Amazon should choose to; they could not only build a 2nd headquarters here but a Distribution Center for International Air Transport; I'm not should any city an give a project the size of Schuylkill Yards to Amazon along with the possibility of a Distribution Center capable of International range.

While this affects the Schuylkill Yards project it may also affect the possibility of the Philadelphia Airport Expansion Project due to the volume the airport handles. At present the 2 largest runways are to close; this causes delays in take offs and landings. The airport already handles UPS and originally UPS was originally slated for Henderson Tract; however word has it that UPS isn't slated to move there now; so the next question is who will? Also, if Amazon or FedEx or both move to the Henderson Tract; then how much more will congestion be added to the International Airport thus requiring the Expansion Project to go forward in the coming years.

https://www.bisnow.com/philadelphia/...ng-cargo-84931
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #939  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2018, 7:01 PM
Nova08 Nova08 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 297
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnIII View Post
Some great news has been show in the last month at the Philadelphia Airport; I was unsure exactly if this should go in the Philadelphia Metro Section or this one however I placed it there and here because this can shed some light on Amazon being in Philadelphia.

The City of Philadelphia buys the Henderson Tract near the Philadelphia International Airport just south of Cargo City. The Henderson Tract is in Tinicum Township, Delaware County. The goals of the Philadelphia International Airport is to turn this into a Freight Distribution Center. Amazon and FedEx were in attendance.

If Amazon should choose to; they could not only build a 2nd headquarters here but a Distribution Center for International Air Transport; I'm not should any city an give a project the size of Schuylkill Yards to Amazon along with the possibility of a Distribution Center capable of International range.

While this affects the Schuylkill Yards project it may also affect the possibility of the Philadelphia Airport Expansion Project due to the volume the airport handles. At present the 2 largest runways are to close; this causes delays in take offs and landings. The airport already handles UPS and originally UPS was originally slated for Henderson Tract; however word has it that UPS isn't slated to move there now; so the next question is who will? Also, if Amazon or FedEx or both move to the Henderson Tract; then how much more will congestion be added to the International Airport thus requiring the Expansion Project to go forward in the coming years.

https://www.bisnow.com/philadelphia/...ng-cargo-84931
This is a good development, but I feel like it's just an initial step of many more before anything concrete develops.

Amazon is building a Memphis/Louisville sized hub for their air operations in Cincinnati. Chances are any other operation would be a much smaller focus type city.

The runway expansion isn't happening short term (10 years). First, it's going to take 100s of daily movements to bring PHL back up to where it was 10 years ago when the runway was first proposed. Second, freight operations typically operate at odd times and not during busy periods of passenger traffic. UPS is expected to expand it's facility and operations. If they plan to make that investment they must have some type of agreement with the airport that it is not going to be bulldozed in a few years for a runway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #940  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2018, 3:37 PM
DrachenFire's Avatar
DrachenFire DrachenFire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Everybody's Hometown
Posts: 31
Anybody know if Bezos is big on squash?


https://www.ussquash.com/wp-content/...ORT-JULY17.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:20 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.