HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2018, 2:10 AM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
Marshall Squares - Feb 11, 2018:







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2018, 8:02 AM
Bwin517 Bwin517 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 99
Thanks for the great updates, Cardinal!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2018, 1:03 AM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
Sparq - Feb 11, 2018:







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2018, 6:41 PM
Bwin517 Bwin517 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 99
https://www.bisnow.com/silicon-valle...san-jose-85473

Santa Clara County has signed one of the largest leases of the quarter in Silicon Valley. It inked a lease for 204K SF at the yet-to-be-built six-story building at 353 West Julian St. planned by The Sobrato Organization in Downtown San Jose, The Mercury News reports.

San Jose’s office market has heated up in recent months following Google’s plans for a new campus at Diridon Station. Adobe Systems plans to break ground in 2019 on a fourth tower to its downtown headquarters. A JV between TMG Partners and Valley Oak Partners plans to build 1M SF of office in downtown San Jose.

Construction on what could be downtown San Jose’s first Class-A office building in the last few years is expected to begin in eight to 10 weeks with completion in Q3 2019, The Sobrato Organization Vice President of Leasing and Acquisitions Chase Lyman told The Mercury News. The office building is part of the River Corporate Center.

Santa Clara County currently has two leases of 145K SF each at two office buildings at 333 and 373 West Julian St.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2018, 8:35 PM
Bwin517 Bwin517 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 99
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2018, 6:16 PM
giantSwan's Avatar
giantSwan giantSwan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast, United States
Posts: 294
If San Fran has a massive housing shortage, why doesn't Oakland and San Jose build upwards with large skyscrapers? I understand the nimbyism in SF (and trying to protect long established neighborhoods- but couldn't SJ and Oakland pick up some of the demand?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2018, 6:19 PM
pizzaguy pizzaguy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by giantSwan View Post
If San Fran has a massive housing shortage, why doesn't Oakland and San Jose build upwards with large skyscrapers? I understand the nimbyism in SF (and trying to protect long established neighborhoods- but couldn't SJ and Oakland pick up some of the demand?
nimbyism doesn't end at the SF County line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2018, 6:40 PM
F1 Tommy's Avatar
F1 Tommy F1 Tommy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillynova View Post
There has been a lot of news in San Jose/South Bay lately, which is very exciting. I truly believe this is due to Google's plans to moving to downtown.







Rendering courtesy of SVBJ - renderings from Arquitectonica Architects

Source: https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/...julian-st.html
Nice looking buildings. They remind me of the much taller Aqua tower in Chicago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2018, 5:22 AM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
The Graduate - Mar 4, 2018









Foundation work going up fast, it is certainly saving them time taking down the McDonalds to avoid going underground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2018, 7:59 PM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by giantSwan View Post
If San Fran has a massive housing shortage, why doesn't Oakland and San Jose build upwards with large skyscrapers? I understand the nimbyism in SF (and trying to protect long established neighborhoods- but couldn't SJ and Oakland pick up some of the demand?
San Jose already builds more housing than the others, but developers don't want to build here, because of high construction costs, and "low rents", apparently if rents aren't as high as SF that's what you get, at least for high rises. When the buildings are capped at around 200-300 ft there aren't that many "high floors" to have premium rents. Even today new apartment rents are still below 3k for new apartments. Why bother building apartments when building offices in Sunnyvale and Cupertino or SF nets you more money.

It's about supply and demand and the demand isn't there for San Jose. You can get higher rents in downtown Oakland, but I'm not sure if it is competitive enough.

The condo market seems to be going the other way so maybe more soon. But right now there are 5 residential high rises under construction in SJ.

NYMBYism really isn't an issue in DTSJ, though I keep seeing more and more people opposing new apartments, because they themselves can't afford them. But propose something in another neighborhood, like Volar in Santana Row and then you see them come out of the woodwork.

Either way realistically SJ can't pick up SF's slack, do you know how far apart the cities are?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2018, 8:00 PM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bwin517 View Post
^^^

Quote:
...
A total of 750 residential units, a 150-seat theater and 120,000 square feet of commercial space — a designation that could include a hotel, retail, or offices — are being proposed for several parcels near the corner of South Second and East William streets, along with adjacent lots near South First and East William streets.

“The SoFA area is a place where people are looking for space to do creative things,” said Bob Staedler, principal executive with Silicon Valley Synergy, a land-use and planning consultancy. “It’s an urban, hip part of downtown San Jose with a lot of creative spaces.”

...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2018, 8:17 PM
Bwin517 Bwin517 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 99
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/03/...adobe-diridon/

SAN JOSE — Several hundred homes, an expanded theater and other commercial uses such as a hotel are being eyed in a part of downtown San Jose that’s become a hotbed of development interest.

The development plans have emerged at the south end of downtown San Jose in a neighborhood known as the SoFA district.

“If you look at what’s happening in this area, it was The Pierce that changed everything,” said Mark Ritchie, president of Ritchie Commercial, a realty brokerage. The Pierce is a new 230-unit residential development on South First Street.

A total of 750 residential units, a 150-seat theater and 120,000 square feet of commercial space — a designation that could include a hotel, retail, or offices — are being proposed for several parcels near the corner of South Second and East William streets, along with adjacent lots near South First and East William streets.

“The SoFA area is a place where people are looking for space to do creative things,” said Bob Staedler, principal executive with Silicon Valley Synergy, a land-use and planning consultancy. “It’s an urban, hip part of downtown San Jose with a lot of creative spaces.”

At present, the development site includes the 100-seat City Lights Theater, a non-profit live-performance venue. The site also includes some residences and a small market, according to documents on file with San Jose city planners.

The development proposal would expand the existing theater seating.

Recent plans for the site have included a 20-story residential tower and a 20-story boutique hotel, according to Staedler.

Separately, developers have proposed other projects in the same south downtown area.


San Jose’s tallest building would rise at 600 S. First St. next to East Reed Street, if developers build a 27-story residential tower containing 285 units and ground-floor retail. Nearby, at the corner of South Second and East Reed streets, developers want to construct a 110-room, seven-story hotel.

“You have an entirely new neighborhood emerging in the SoFA area,” Ritchie said.

Officials with the San Jose Institute of Contemporary Art, which owns its building next to the proposed project site, said they are aware of the efforts by entrepreneurs to assemble parcels for the development. They said they’ve been approached to sell their property, but aren’t interested in selling at present.

“More residential would be fantastic for us; development is a good thing, but we have to see,” said Cathy Kimball, executive director and chief curator of the Institute of Contemporary Art. “My concern is that there is the potential of destroying an arts district in order to create an arts district.”

Mountain View-based Google’s interest in developing a transit-oriented community of office towers and amenities on the western edges of downtown San Jose near the Diridon transit station and SAP Center appears to have spurred development and investment interest in the city’s urban core. Google plans to build 6 million to 8 million square feet of offices that could accommodate 15,000 to 20,000 of the search giant’s employees.

Plus, in a major expansion of Adobe’s downtown San Jose headquarters campus, Adobe intends to build a new office tower on West San Fernando Street adjacent to the company’s existing three high-rise office buildings.

“With the Google effect and Adobe’s expansion, people are feeling more secure about their investments downtown,” Staedler said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2018, 3:43 AM
iamfishhead iamfishhead is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by cardinal2007 View Post
San Jose already builds more housing than the others, but developers don't want to build here, because of high construction costs, and "low rents", apparently if rents aren't as high as SF that's what you get, at least for high rises. When the buildings are capped at around 200-300 ft there aren't that many "high floors" to have premium rents. Even today new apartment rents are still below 3k for new apartments. Why bother building apartments when building offices in Sunnyvale and Cupertino or SF nets you more money.

It's about supply and demand and the demand isn't there for San Jose. You can get higher rents in downtown Oakland, but I'm not sure if it is competitive enough.

The condo market seems to be going the other way so maybe more soon. But right now there are 5 residential high rises under construction in SJ.

NYMBYism really isn't an issue in DTSJ, though I keep seeing more and more people opposing new apartments, because they themselves can't afford them. But propose something in another neighborhood, like Volar in Santana Row and then you see them come out of the woodwork.

Either way realistically SJ can't pick up SF's slack, do you know how far apart the cities are?
Yeah, having lived in both, there's not much of a comparison between demand. DTSJ also has the disadvantage of being near the airport, so if the building isn't well soundproofed, it could drive the rents down. If you had more frequent Caltrain service and BART to DTSJ, it would probably be somewhat of a different story, but both are likely to be at least 5-10 years out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2018, 5:49 PM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
Miro Towers - Mar 4, 2018



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2018, 3:15 AM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
The Graduate - Mar 11, 2018







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2018, 1:48 AM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/03/...adobe-diridon/

Quote:
SAN JOSE — Three office towers could rise on a site between downtown San Jose’s convention center and the Guadalupe River, a fresh indicator that Google’s plans for downtown office buildings can spark development interest elsewhere in the urban core.

Boston Properties, which has wielded development rights on the site for several years, has made inquiries to San Jose planners regarding the development of a trio of office high rises on the property. At present, the property is used for surface parking. A Boston Properties executive said Monday the company didn’t want to immediately discuss detailed plans.

...

The recent submission to city planners by Boston Properties didn’t disclose a proposed square footage and heights of the buildings. However, an office tower adjacent to the north end of the site is 11 stories high and totals 157,000 square feet. And a marketing flyer for the site that was circulated a few years ago stated the three buildings together would total roughly 840,000 square feet. One building would total 320,000 square feet and two would be 260,000 square feet, with the heights around 10 to 12 stories.

...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2018, 4:19 PM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
Sparq - Mar 11, 2018:







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2018, 4:53 PM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
Balbach Condos - Mar 11, 2018:









There seems to be a major condo shortage in terms of inventory for sale this year, so hopefully this will help address it, if it is completed soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2018, 4:56 PM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
Marshall Squares - Mar 11, 2018:





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2018, 5:19 PM
cardinal2007's Avatar
cardinal2007 cardinal2007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Jose
Posts: 243
Silvery Towers - Mar 11, 2018:









Can anyone tell me what the changes have been now that the buildings are topped off?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:11 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.