HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > San Antonio


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2008, 8:04 PM
max777 max777 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago(Palatine), San Antonio(78208), Piedras Negras, Mexico
Posts: 33
San Antonio is being shortchanged!

I don't understand. I am a new member and I don't get why the City of San Antonio doesn't get more skyscrapers. It is currently the 7th largest city in the U.S. It is the headquarters of many Fortune 500 companies like Valero Energy and AT and T.
In addition, I think that the Alamodome should be lit up at night with neon on the 4 support columns. Blue and green maybe would look nice. Furthermore, I think the Tower of the Americas should be modernized more from the exterior to make it look more futuristic. I think that maybe 3 rings of neon around the tower would make it look more fascinating at night. I think either white or green would make it have a more futuristic look at night.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2008, 8:22 PM
Dom"n"Converse's Avatar
Dom"n"Converse Dom"n"Converse is offline
Hmmm....
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 159
But then we would look tacky, like Dallas at night.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2008, 8:38 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: there and back again
Posts: 57,324
Neon lights, or in the case of Dallas, argon (Bank of America) has to be done carefully. It can look great, but also overdone and tacky. In Austin, our 4th tallest building, the One Congress Plaza, has blue neon lighting on the setbacks. The building had won several years in a row in the Austin Chronicle's "The best of Austin" for best modern building in the city, until the Frost Bank Tower came along.
__________________
Donate to Donald Trump's campaign today!

Thou shall not indict
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2008, 10:45 PM
oldmanshirt's Avatar
oldmanshirt oldmanshirt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SATX > KCMO > DFW
Posts: 1,170
Its true that SA's skyline is drab and seems disappointingly short, but remembering that SA is the 27th largest metro (not the 7th largest) helps to put it in a little bit better perspective. Its also located in a state that has three other medium to large metros that have had or are in the process of having building booms that result/ed in lots of tall buildings. That's just the mindset in those places. Compare SA with other downtowns like Salt Lake City, Milwaukee, Tampa, Columbus, which are close to SA's metro size, and you might feel a little bit better about the situation. Phoenix and San Jose (which seems laid out more like a Bay Area suburb) are the only two top 10 cities that have skylines really comparable with SA's. Dallas, Houston, Philly, et al smoke SA, thanks at least in some part to metro populations that add a lot of wealth and density.

That having been said, welcome to the forum

I've also wondered what could be done to modernize the ToA. Adding lights is definitely one way to do it at night, but I'd also love to see architectural elements added to the roof to change to profile and add some height (ala CN Tower).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 12:39 AM
Texas Tuff's Avatar
Texas Tuff Texas Tuff is offline
Squint Like Clint
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 1,064
Like you, I have often wondered why some tall skyscrapers haven't been built in SA. One possible explanation may be that there are a lot of historic buildings in the downtown core that are closely protected by a local preservation society so clearing some of those buildings off to acquire highly desirable locations to build something new may be nearly impossible. However, there are some parking lots in the DT core and space around the edges of the DT core that one could build on so that's most likely not an adequate explanation. Maybe someday we'll get lucky and one of those F500 companies will decide to build a landmark tower, there's always hope! Anyway, I also want to say welcome to the forum.
__________________
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly American criminal class except Congress" - Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 12:41 AM
ydoc14's Avatar
ydoc14 ydoc14 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 1,123
I love skyscrapers, and buildings in general. But, if San Antonio never got another skyscraper, I would still be content w/ the skyline as is. Am I the only nut who feels this way? lol
__________________
GO SPURS GO! | My Photography
SAN ANTONIO
~ been here since April 2005...formerly sanantoniorocks21 and sarocks14
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 12:44 AM
Texas Tuff's Avatar
Texas Tuff Texas Tuff is offline
Squint Like Clint
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 1,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by ydoc14 View Post
I love skyscrapers, and buildings in general. But, if San Antonio never got another skyscraper, I would still be content w/ the skyline as is. Am I the only nut who feels this way? lol
Not at all! Even though it would be really cool for SA to get a really tall scraper, I still like the current skyline.
__________________
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly American criminal class except Congress" - Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 1:48 AM
TXLove's Avatar
TXLove TXLove is offline
$$Money on my Mind$$
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 1,747
I was in San Antonio over the weekend and stayed in the Staybridge Suites @ sunset station on the 12th floor facing west. Had a good view of DT and start imagining if Sa had some modern glass towers what would it look like. Personally I think the skyline is good as it is but it wouldn't hurt it maybe to have a few 500-700 ft glass scrapers. That being said San Antonio still is a great city and the older gems in the core make up for its lack of glass and height!!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 2:17 AM
DanielM DanielM is online now
what the?!
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 38
well one way to may the ToA look better is to change the color of the deck to something other than dark brown. i HATE that dark brown color. although i cant think of what other color it could be that would make it look better.
__________________
i kicked my shoes off in a fit of joy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 2:42 AM
oldmanshirt's Avatar
oldmanshirt oldmanshirt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SATX > KCMO > DFW
Posts: 1,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by ydoc14 View Post
I love skyscrapers, and buildings in general. But, if San Antonio never got another skyscraper, I would still be content w/ the skyline as is. Am I the only nut who feels this way? lol
I agree with you. SA has one of the most pedestrian-friendly, most human-scaled downtowns of any city I've been to. The problem with the skyline to me isn't so much lack of height as it is a lack of hierarchy. The 400+ footers are just too spread out, with two nodes (the Marriotts and Grand Hyatt) on one end, Weston and BoA on the other end, and the ToA and Tower Life kinda off to themselves. If all of those were within 5 or 6 blocks of each other, it would look a lot better. The solution to that seems to be building a few towers of moderate height (say, 250-400 feet) in place of existing parking garages or parking lots around Market and Commerce Sts and around Navarro and Pecan, and then maybe one signature tower that's between the Weston and ToA in height.

NuStar, you listening??
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 2:45 AM
ydoc14's Avatar
ydoc14 ydoc14 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 1,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielM View Post
well one way to may the ToA look better is to change the color of the deck to something other than dark brown. i HATE that dark brown color. although i cant think of what other color it could be that would make it look better.
It's actually black now...been that way for the last 2 years...and looks much better at that.
__________________
GO SPURS GO! | My Photography
SAN ANTONIO
~ been here since April 2005...formerly sanantoniorocks21 and sarocks14
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 2:47 AM
sakyle04's Avatar
sakyle04 sakyle04 is offline
COGSADCAJA, VP and CGO
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Frozen Swamps of Ohio
Posts: 1,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldmanshirt View Post
I agree with you. SA has one of the most pedestrian-friendly, most human-scaled downtowns of any city I've been to. The problem with the skyline to me isn't so much lack of height as it is a lack of hierarchy. The 400+ footers are just too spread out, with two nodes (the Marriotts and Grand Hyatt) on one end, Weston and BoA on the other end, and the ToA and Tower Life kinda off to themselves. If all of those were within 5 or 6 blocks of each other, it would look a lot better. The solution to that seems to be building a few towers of moderate height (say, 250-400 feet) in place of existing parking garages or parking lots around Market and Commerce Sts and around Navarro and Pecan, and then maybe one signature tower that's between the Weston and ToA in height.

NuStar, you listening??
^^^ hearing you loud and clear.

latest rumor i heard contains a dirty word for our future HQ: "campus"

still nothing even remotely settled, but i'll let the forum know when i know...
__________________
PAVE PARADISE, PUT UP A (HIGH-RISE ON A) PARKING LOT...
Kyle on Twitter
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 2:48 AM
ydoc14's Avatar
ydoc14 ydoc14 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 1,123
I also want to say that I saw the skyline from the top of Tower View Rd. in Helotes today. Besides the fact that I was left speechless by the surrounding views of the Hill Country, I also found the skyline from this angle to be impressive and it also made the buildings look clustered and not spread out (so that depends on the angle). However, viewing the skyline from that far out makes you have to look really hard for Tower Life and BOAP. All the others stand out prominently, and yes including the Grand Hyatt, which really does make a nice addition to the skyline.
__________________
GO SPURS GO! | My Photography
SAN ANTONIO
~ been here since April 2005...formerly sanantoniorocks21 and sarocks14
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 5:14 PM
KeepSanAntonioLame KeepSanAntonioLame is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by sakyle04 View Post
^^^ hearing you loud and clear.

latest rumor i heard contains a dirty word for our future HQ: "campus"

still nothing even remotely settled, but i'll let the forum know when i know...
ATT calls their downtown site a campus.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 6:47 PM
sakyle04's Avatar
sakyle04 sakyle04 is offline
COGSADCAJA, VP and CGO
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Frozen Swamps of Ohio
Posts: 1,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by KeepSanAntonioLame View Post
ATT calls their downtown site a campus.
NuStar was birthed out of Valero. That is the "campus" that is held as the gold standard.

Remember that it was under Greehey's leadership that Valero moved from their 281/St Marys HQ to the 1604/I10 campus (after they bought Diamond Shamrock - UDS). He is now the Chairman of NuStar and a resident of Dominion.

So, any mention of "campus" around here leans suburban.
__________________
PAVE PARADISE, PUT UP A (HIGH-RISE ON A) PARKING LOT...
Kyle on Twitter
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 7:49 PM
FastFerrari82's Avatar
FastFerrari82 FastFerrari82 is offline
Let's Eat!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: From Texas - 210
Posts: 274
i no everyone is passionate about having nice "big city" skyscrapers. However lets take time to marvel in what SA does have goin on now. When has SA ever had, not one or even 3 but 5 (including the Broadway project) buildings under construction in a such a short time from on another. Downtown will change when its ready and the wait wont seem as long when it does happen.

to San Antonio! ! ! !! !
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 8:51 PM
PartyLine PartyLine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 506
AT&T isn't based in SA anymore their moving their headquarters to Dallas which I think is dumb and I live in Austin but was born in SA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 8:55 PM
KeepSanAntonioLame KeepSanAntonioLame is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by sakyle04 View Post
NuStar was birthed out of Valero. That is the "campus" that is held as the gold standard.

Remember that it was under Greehey's leadership that Valero moved from their 281/St Marys HQ to the 1604/I10 campus (after they bought Diamond Shamrock - UDS). He is now the Chairman of NuStar and a resident of Dominion.

So, any mention of "campus" around here leans suburban.
I just mention it because campus can be used in another context other than suburban. ATT uses it because they have multiple buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2008, 9:27 PM
sakyle04's Avatar
sakyle04 sakyle04 is offline
COGSADCAJA, VP and CGO
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Frozen Swamps of Ohio
Posts: 1,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by KeepSanAntonioLame View Post
I just mention it because campus can be used in another context other than suburban. ATT uses it because they have multiple buildings.
ya, i get what you're saying...

all i hear now is rumors anyway, so who knows...
__________________
PAVE PARADISE, PUT UP A (HIGH-RISE ON A) PARKING LOT...
Kyle on Twitter
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2008, 12:58 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: there and back again
Posts: 57,324
Quote:
Originally Posted by KeepSanAntonioLame View Post
ATT calls their downtown site a campus.
Yeah, it's just an institutional word. I had asked a janitor at a hospital recently if there were any functioning change machines around. He said no, that I would have to go off campus. The hospital only occupies two buildings at that site.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastFerrari82
When has SA ever had, not one or even 3 but 5 (including the Broadway project) buildings under construction in a such a short time from on another.
I can't peg which buildings specifically, or what year(s), without double checking, but yes, there have been some. The 20s, 30s, and 80s saw a lot of construction, as did many cities across the country during those eras.


Quote:
Originally Posted by PartyLine
I live in Austin but was born in SA.
Heh, me too. Was born in San Antonio and have always lived in Austin. I was almost born in a car though.
__________________
Donate to Donald Trump's campaign today!

Thou shall not indict
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > San Antonio
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:53 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.