HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 4:24 PM
sacrifice333 sacrifice333 is offline
Vancouver User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,460
Post In German Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars



Quote:
Originally Posted by New York Times
In German Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars
By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
Published: May 11, 2009

VAUBAN, Germany — Residents of this upscale community are suburban pioneers, going where few soccer moms or commuting executives have ever gone before: they have given up their cars.

Street parking, driveways and home garages are generally forbidden in this experimental new district on the outskirts of Freiburg, near the French and Swiss borders. Vauban’s streets are completely “car-free” — except the main thoroughfare, where the tram to downtown Freiburg runs, and a few streets on one edge of the community. Car ownership is allowed, but there are only two places to park — large garages at the edge of the development, where a car-owner buys a space, for $40,000, along with a home.

As a result, 70 percent of Vauban’s families do not own cars, and 57 percent sold a car to move here. “When I had a car I was always tense. I’m much happier this way,” said Heidrun Walter, a media trainer and mother of two, as she walked verdant streets where the swish of bicycles and the chatter of wandering children drown out the occasional distant motor.

Vauban, completed in 2006, is an example of a growing trend in Europe, the United States and elsewhere to separate suburban life from auto use, as a component of a movement called “smart planning.”

Automobiles are the linchpin of suburbs, where middle-class families from Chicago to Shanghai tend to make their homes. And that, experts say, is a huge impediment to current efforts to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions from tailpipes, and thus to reduce global warming. Passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe — a proportion that is growing, according to the European Environment Agency — and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States.

While there have been efforts in the past two decades to make cities denser, and better for walking, planners are now taking the concept to the suburbs and focusing specifically on environmental benefits like reducing emissions. Vauban, home to 5,500 residents within a rectangular square mile, may be the most advanced experiment in low-car suburban life. But its basic precepts are being adopted around the world in attempts to make suburbs more compact and more accessible to public transportation, with less space for parking. In this new approach, stores are placed a walk away, on a main street, rather than in malls along some distant highway.

“All of our development since World War II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change,” said David Goldberg, an official of Transportation for America, a fast-growing coalition of hundreds of groups in the United States — including environmental groups, mayors’ offices and the American Association of Retired People — who are promoting new communities that are less dependent on cars. Mr. Goldberg added: “How much you drive is as important as whether you have a hybrid.”

Levittown and Scarsdale, New York suburbs with spread-out homes and private garages, were the dream towns of the 1950s and still exert a strong appeal. But some new suburbs may well look more Vauban-like, not only in developed countries but also in the developing world, where emissions from an increasing number of private cars owned by the burgeoning middle class are choking cities.

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency is promoting “car reduced” communities, and legislators are starting to act, if cautiously. Many experts expect public transport serving suburbs to play a much larger role in a new six-year federal transportation bill to be approved this year, Mr. Goldberg said. In previous bills, 80 percent of appropriations have by law gone to highways and only 20 percent to other transport.

In California, the Hayward Area Planning Association is developing a Vauban-like community called Quarry Village on the outskirts of Oakland, accessible without a car to the Bay Area Rapid Transit system and to the California State University’s campus in Hayward.

Sherman Lewis, a professor emeritus at Cal State and a leader of the association, says he “can’t wait to move in” and hopes that Quarry Village will allow his family to reduce its car ownership from two to one, and potentially to zero. But the current system is still stacked against the project, he said, noting that mortgage lenders worry about resale value of half-million-dollar homes that have no place for cars, and most zoning laws in the United States still require two parking spaces per residential unit. Quarry Village has obtained an exception from Hayward.

Besides, convincing people to give up their cars is often an uphill run. “People in the U.S. are incredibly suspicious of any idea where people are not going to own cars, or are going to own fewer,” said David Ceaser, co-founder of CarFree City USA, who said no car-free suburban project the size of Vauban had been successful in the United States.

In Europe, some governments are thinking on a national scale. In 2000, Britain began a comprehensive effort to reform planning, to discourage car use by requiring that new development be accessible by public transit.

“Development comprising jobs, shopping, leisure and services should not be designed and located on the assumption that the car will represent the only realistic means of access for the vast majority of people,” said PPG 13, the British government’s revolutionary 2001 planning document. Dozens of shopping malls, fast-food restaurants and housing compounds have been refused planning permits based on the new British regulations.

In Germany, a country that is home to Mercedes-Benz and the autobahn, life in a car-reduced place like Vauban has its own unusual gestalt. The town is long and relatively narrow, so that the tram into Freiburg is an easy walk from every home. Stores, restaurants, banks and schools are more interspersed among homes than they are in a typical suburb. Most residents, like Ms. Walter, have carts that they haul behind bicycles for shopping trips or children’s play dates.

For trips to stores like IKEA or the ski slopes, families buy cars together or use communal cars rented out by Vauban’s car-sharing club. Ms. Walter had previously lived — with a private car — in Freiburg as well as the United States.

“If you have one, you tend to use it,” she said. “Some people move in here and move out rather quickly — they miss the car next door.”

Vauban, the site of a former Nazi army base, was occupied by the French Army from the end of World War II until the reunification of Germany two decades ago. Because it was planned as a base, the grid was never meant to accommodate private car use: the “roads” were narrow passageways between barracks.

The original buildings have long since been torn down. The stylish row houses that replaced them are buildings of four or five stories, designed to reduce heat loss and maximize energy efficiency, and trimmed with exotic woods and elaborate balconies; free-standing homes are forbidden.

By nature, people who buy homes in Vauban are inclined to be green guinea pigs — indeed, more than half vote for the German Green Party. Still, many say it is the quality of life that keeps them here.

Henk Schulz, a scientist who on one afternoon last month was watching his three young children wander around Vauban, remembers his excitement at buying his first car. Now, he said, he is glad to be raising his children away from cars; he does not worry much about their safety in the street.

In the past few years, Vauban has become a well-known niche community, even if it has spawned few imitators in Germany. But whether the concept will work in California is an open question.

More than 100 would-be owners have signed up to buy in the Bay Area’s “car-reduced” Quarry Village, and Mr. Lewis is still looking for about $2 million in seed financing to get the project off the ground.

But if it doesn’t work, his backup proposal is to build a development on the same plot that permits unfettered car use. It would be called Village d’Italia.
Article Link.

Car-Free Slideshow.

__________________
Check out TripStyler.com {locally focused travel blog} | My instagram {Travel Photos}
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 4:39 PM
racc racc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,241
This is what the Olympic Village should have been. It probably would have come in under budget as well. Also proves you don't need a car if you have children.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 4:48 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,264
They should get some projects going here in Vancouver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 4:51 PM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by racc View Post
This is what the Olympic Village should have been. It probably would have come in under budget as well. Also proves you don't need a car if you have children.
Well, once they get old enough for you to boss them around and send them to the store on their own, anyways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 5:04 PM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
During European Field School last year I visited Freiburg and the Vauban area. While Vauban is a really interesting sustainable neighbourhood, I much preferred Rieselfeld. They are both brilliant developments but Rieselfeld had more of an urban feel to it.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 5:19 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
Well, once they get old enough for you to boss them around and send them to the store on their own, anyways.
I've never been driven to work, I've always walked myself and my sister to school. Parents these days are paranoid about their kids being kidnapped which is a real danger but I hope I can raise my kids to be responsible enough that they can ride their bikes around the neighbourhood no problems. I used to ride my bike to the store to get medicine and stuff for my mom who was recoverring from cancer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 5:46 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,026
Wow... sounds idyllic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 6:18 PM
Tom Bombadil Tom Bombadil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by racc View Post
This is what the Olympic Village should have been. It probably would have come in under budget as well. Also proves you don't need a car if you have children.
Of course you don't NEED a car. You don't need electricity either. We choose to have them for comfort and convenience. We can survive w/o modern conveniences. They are nice to have, however.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 6:20 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKaz View Post
I've never been driven to work, I've always walked myself and my sister to school. Parents these days are paranoid about their kids being kidnapped which is a real danger but I hope I can raise my kids to be responsible enough that they can ride their bikes around the neighbourhood no problems.

don't you have a kid coming soon?


back on topic:

sometimes i wonder if it would be possible for me to abandon the family cars and transport my growing tribe via feet and public transportation.

but it's those little insignificant trips that worry me the most. trips to grandma, trips to get groceries, trips to entertainment (movies, restaurants....etc), trips to the clinic, trips to the beach...

of course, the olympic village has all the amenities you may want, but one can not shop all the time at the uber-expensive Urban Fare and if family members do not live a couple condos down... well you just are not going to see them as much.
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 6:26 PM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Within the Cordillera
Posts: 12,493
I haven't owned an automobile in nearly 7 years. Even here in a small city, i walk 45min to work, ride my bike, take the only bus in town, or get the odd ride. I guess it would be nice to own a car again but i certainly don't need it and i'm in great shape. I would rather spend money on other things.
__________________
Castlegar BC: SSP's hottest city (43.9C)
Lytton BC: Canada’s hottest city (49.6C)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 6:33 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
Wow... sounds idyllic.
Freiburg isn't Vancouver, that's for sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 6:50 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
don't you have a kid coming soon?
Yes I do, time will tell how this all turns out. The wife is planning to use West Coast Express/transit whenever possible to come into town.

I meant to say I've never been driven to school in my original post, but we've never lived more than a 5 minute walk away from school and with so many kids walking to school back in the days, there were really no inherent dangers other than maybe bullies. My next house will definitely have walking distance to school in mind (which I don't have) as well as accessibility to a good transit route (10 minute walk to West Coast Express, good enough!).

We're still on the fence of whether we're going to stay in Mission or maybe think of the area around Haney Station or even closer in like Port Moody.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 7:31 PM
racc racc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post

sometimes i wonder if it would be possible for me to abandon the family cars and transport my growing tribe via feet and public transportation.

but it's those little insignificant trips that worry me the most. trips to grandma, trips to get groceries, trips to entertainment (movies, restaurants....etc), trips to the clinic, trips to the beach...
Car-coop and taxis. Probably much cheaper for infrequent use than owning a car.

Quote:
of course, the olympic village has all the amenities you may want, but one can not shop all the time at the uber-expensive Urban Fare
Probably easier to walk with a cart to the new Save-on-foods on Cambie than driving.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 8:15 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,264
Just buy a car that uses a lot of gas which will deter you from using it unnecessarily but is fun to drive when you do use. My friend downtown has a Mazda 3 GT, uses quite a bit of gas (for a compact) but it's around when she needs it and she generally walks to work, get groceries, etc. anyway.

The problem with car sharing is that manual transmission cars are not available with those programs. For those of us who find driving as a source of enjoyment once in awhile (the Sunday drive), that's a dealbreaker.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 9:18 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by racc View Post
Car-coop and taxis. Probably much cheaper for infrequent use than owning a car.

mmm, i wonder.

regarding operational costs alone, lets say i spend $1,800/y on gas ($35 week), $2000 insurance, $1000/year maintenance, that's 4,800 year. for one vehicle

that averages out to about $13 a day or $92 a week.

now, i have no idea how much a taxi ride to safeway or to my inlaws costs, but i think a family would spend more than 13$ a day.
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 11:12 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,097
It all depends where you want to go as well.

During the week I have almost no need for a car, I ride ~15km to work or take the bus to ubc. Every couple weekends on the other hand I drive to whistler to go skiing. I have yet to see coop cars with ski racks, so there goes that option and busses that are for day skiing leave near 5am. Pass on that one.

I honestly just keep my car around as a hobby though. I tinker with it incessantly. You'd be pretty hard pressed to get me give it up, and I bet that it would be the same for a lot of people even here in lotus land.

I wonder what these guys do for heavy services
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted May 12, 2009, 11:57 PM
WBC WBC is offline
Transit User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Metrotown/Downtown
Posts: 786
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
mmm, i wonder.

regarding operational costs alone, lets say i spend $1,800/y on gas ($35 week), $2000 insurance, $1000/year maintenance, that's 4,800 year. for one vehicle

that averages out to about $13 a day or $92 a week.

now, i have no idea how much a taxi ride to safeway or to my inlaws costs, but i think a family would spend more than 13$ a day.
Well you could re-arrange your life so that for example instead of going to Safeway you get things delivered. I think they deliver gorceries for free if the purchase is big enough (over $40 I think).

I think it is also much more effience for one truck to deliver groceries to 100 people then for 100 people to drive to Safeway and purchase food.

I used to live without a car for almost 10 years after university. It is doable, but what I found out is that you start operating in much smaller area then you would with a car. For example, I lived in Coal Harbour and would rarely if ever leave downtown except to visit my family or friends (by SkyTrain). So no going to distant parks, no shopping in cheaper stores, no going somewhere just becuase, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 20, 2009, 5:17 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ Empirically Canadian
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 11,998
The article suggests some such trend in North America. I would like to see some version of this. I think it would be a hard sell here, but possibly it could be done in Vancouver, if anywhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 20, 2009, 6:01 AM
crazyjoeda's Avatar
crazyjoeda crazyjoeda is offline
Mac User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 861
It is very possible to live in Metro Vancouver with out a car. Especially right in Vancouver, in fact most of the people I know who live in Kits or downtown have never bothered to get a drivers license because it doesn't make sense. For the most par suburban cities like Surrey are actually fairly dense but lack transit and cycling infrastructure. The largest barrier to a car free suburbia is convincing people to give up their cars. People choose to live in the suburbs and operating a car is very affordable. Metro Vancouver is ahead of the trend in North America but our cities need to do more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:28 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.