Quote:
Originally Posted by CityBoyDoug
.....
primopian
The Revival lasted from 1906 till 1931. Hardly a brief event....in fact its still happening in 2018 Los Angeles....although in a more reduced form.
|
Re the house on Bonnie Brae--from
KCET's history of the street:
"The crowds grew too large for the little house on Bonnie Brae, eventually collapsing the front porch. Soon after, with the help of his followers, Seymour relocated his teachings to an empty building on Azusa Street in Little Tokyo, and the Pentecostal Movement began to flourish."
Of course, there is the matter of Seymour's inspiration, one Charles Fox Parham. Strangely enough, if not surprisingly, he was a member of the KKK...and there was that matter of his having been charged with diddling some little boys in Texas in 1907...anyway, he came to LA to spread cheer in 1924:
LAT Feb 4, 1924
All very noirish, in a 1906 way..."lunacy, infidelity, necromancy, mandacity"....
A few interesting items from
this site
"The roots of Azusa Street were planted in a Houston, Texas, Bible school taught by Charles Fox Parham. William Seymour was a student of Charles Parham in 1903 and was convinced of the need to receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit, such baptism being evident by the ability to speak in tongues. Seymour was invited to work with a small holiness group in Los Angeles, California. On the way, he stopped in Denver, Colorado, and visited Alma White's Pillar of Fire movement. Alma White was not impressed with Seymour. She later said, 'I had met all kinds of religious fakers and tramps, but I felt he excelled them all.' Upon arriving in Los Angeles, William Seymour preached only one sermon at the church who had invited him. The group then rejected him. Seymour continued his meeting though, preaching about Holy Spirit baptism in a warehouse on Azusa Street."
The site also adds
"With all that in mind, there is a book titled From Holy Laughter to Holy Fire by Michael L. Brown which quotes five respected Bible scholars from that era who witness the events that occurred on Azusa street. Mr. Brown quoted them to say they were wrong, but these men were contemporaries of the events and Mr. Brown, an Assemblies of God minister, is not. Since his denomination evolved from the events of Azusa Street, he also has strong motivation to put its origins in the best light that he can. I do appreciate the fact that he was willing to quote his detractors.G. Campbell Morgan described the activities on Azusa Street as 'the last vomit of Satan.' R. A. Torrey declared that this movement was 'emphatically not of God, and founded by a Sodomite.' H. A. Ironside said in 1912 that the movement was 'disgusting ... delusions and insanities ... pandemonium's were exhibitions worthy of a madhouse or a collection of howling dervishes,' causing a 'heavy toll of lunacy and infidelity.' W. B. Godbey saw the movement as a result of spiritualism and that the participants were 'Satan's preachers, jugglers, necromancers, enchanters, magicians, and all sorts of mendicants.' Clarence Larkin said, 'But the conduct of those possessed, in which they fall to the ground and disgraceful scenes, is more a characteristic of demon possession, than a work of the Holy Spirit. From what has been said we see that we are living in "Perilous Times," and that all about us are "Seducing Spirits," and that they will become more active as the Dispensation draws to its close, and that we must exert the greatest care lest we be led astray.' It is clear that these biblical scholars were not pleased with the events at Azusa Street."