Quote:
Originally Posted by Waterlooson
Sure, they're both populist movements... but that's about it. The central theme of the Reform Party regarded western alienation... and not conservative values... which could already be had by way of the PC Party of Canada. The Tea Party has nothing to do with a number of states feeling excluded from the decision making process of the US Federal Government... which was what the Reform Party was all about and why it was formed. The Reform Party's political reform policies existed to ameliorate this sense of western alienation.
|
I'm not so sure the Tea party's origins reflected Conservative Values. It was more of a Libertarian movement and again came from a sense of voter alienation as well (those damn Eastern Elites!).
I'm not so sure the Tea Party even knew what it was until the media helped shape it. It's really a media created movement that has now been co-opted by the more conservative elements of the Republican Party and the anyone but a black man for President set.
Frankly it was quite interesting to see how the media handled and handles the Occupy Movement versus the Tea Party movement -essential painting the Occupiers as fringe radicals and lending very little legitimacy to their movement and instead focusing on the likelihood of rioting.
anyway my original point was, turns to the left and right in Canada are nothing new and to brand Ford as a Tea Party Mayor is a bit ridiculous and and opportunistic way of using the language of the day.
He was really only voted Mayor because the other candidates kinda stunk and he promised to cut taxes and fees. There wasn't any real shift in the thinking of voters.
Miller would have won again had he run and John Tory would have certainly won had he run.