Quote:
Originally Posted by CherryCreek
In my view, American cities are far less urbane, less interesting architecturally, have greater decay, higher crime, less developed public transport, and otherwise fall short of the finer things I love about cities, as compared to their non-US, developed world counterparts.
|
I think almost everyone would agree with this, excepting the architecture part.
Most of the depressed U.S. cities have much better architecture than cities in Canada or Australia. Detroit, Cleveland, St. Louis, Cincy, Pittsburgh, Buffalo have an embarrassment of architectural riches relative to size.
But, yeah, it isn't exactly breaking news that U.S. urban centers generally have crappier transit, higher crime and more decay than non-U.S. cities.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CherryCreek
Putting aside New York, which does seem to impress most non-Americans, I think many foreign visitors find there to be a disconnect between America's reported wealth (no. 1 GDP) and the look and feel of its cities: we don't look the part.
|
The U.S. is the wealthiest major country based on household income. That doesn't have much to do with quality of public sphere. Spain has a terrific public sphere but moderate household wealth. Germany has inferior public sphere relative to Spain but is much wealthier.
And I would disagree that NYC is the only city that impresses foreigners. Boston, DC, Philly, SF and Chicago have reasonably impressive urban environments, and many other U.S. cities impress for other reasons.