HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 9:40 PM
Azul Azul is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBoot View Post
I may be missing something, but "four" months? Also, each district should have close to 100,000 people in it. Ten districts and a city population of almost 1,000,000?!?
It's part of the Texas Election Code (Sec. 277-022), part (e), which allows a signature to only be good for four months from when you submit the recall itself. Granted it's a little weird, but it's probably necessary for general petitions that could simmer on old signatures for years.
http://austintexas.gov/page/recall-petitions

You only need the signatures from active voters, not everyone in Austin is a registered, active voter. That's where you see the schism between your ideal population and the 61,500 we actually saw.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 10:33 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azul View Post
It's part of the Texas Election Code (Sec. 277-022), part (e), which allows a signature to only be good for four months from when you submit the recall itself. Granted it's a little weird, but it's probably necessary for general petitions that could simmer on old signatures for years.
http://austintexas.gov/page/recall-petitions

You only need the signatures from active voters, not everyone in Austin is a registered, active voter. That's where you see the schism between your ideal population and the 61,500 we actually saw.
Ah & Duh. That makes since - forgot about total pop vs. registered voters. Thanks!
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 12:44 AM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinchaaa View Post
When is her term up? She seriously has to go. She's a drag on this city!
Dude, he was joking. Pool didn't actually say that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBoot View Post
I may be missing something, but "four" months? Also, each district should have close to 100,000 people in it. Ten districts and a city population of almost 1,000,000?!?
Districts are based on 2010 census when COA population was 790,491. City council maps set to be re-drawn after the 2020 census.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 3:17 AM
abigdeal's Avatar
abigdeal abigdeal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Austin, yo
Posts: 198
For those of you that might have missed it, Anthony Precourt was in Austin drinking beer with a group of soccer supporters the same week Leslie Pool was in Columbus with Save the.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2018, 4:01 AM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Genral View Post
Don't know and I agree 100% with you. I've never seen anything or anyone like her before. I am embarrassed about the way she treated Precourt. In celebration of today, Halloween, I did search for the scariest picture I could use for my avatar. I think I found it. If anyone finds this too vile, too disgusting, too disturbing, too hideous, or too scary, let me know and I'll change it.
I'm definitely going to have nightmares. But the reality is we're already living the nightmare of having her as a city council member.

I tried to tell people. I saw this train wreck coming. It was inevitable as soon as she got elected. District 7 voters need to come to their senses.
__________________
Anti-Leslie Pool. Bury I-35! Make The Domain public!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2018, 4:16 PM
427MM's Avatar
427MM 427MM is offline
Love Austin
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,238
District 7 can certainly benefit from a voice that captures sentiments wider than "No!". CM Pool is in her second term but her first term didn't count against her term limits so she may or may not run again (probably will, nothing better to do). The seat is up in two years.

If you all are serious about finding a new voice for the district that represents a wider range of voices in that area of town start looking now. And when they run make sure you max out to them: $350 for an individual or $700 for a couple. If you live in district hosting small parties for the candidate is huge!! If you live out of district mobilize your friends and family who are there.

I'm nervous about how many NIMBYs want to serve. "Let's plan for Austin in 1980! Only the rich shall have their single family home! Let's pretend to care about everyone else! Oops, didn't mean to say that last part out loud, hehe"
__________________
How long will Austinites tolerate NIMBY politicians?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2018, 1:00 AM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,273
Paid Canvassers for COTA's new PAC caught lying about stadium petition on video.

https://youtu.be/Fhg6Du3NEPc
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2018, 1:13 AM
clubtokyo's Avatar
clubtokyo clubtokyo is offline
クラブトクヨ
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
Paid Canvassers for COTA's new PAC caught lying about stadium petition on video.

https://youtu.be/Fhg6Du3NEPc
Wtf?? Whos begins this?!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2018, 4:12 AM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,260
I noticed that it was a Statesman video...did they write an article exposing the fraudulent petition/petitioners?
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2018, 5:58 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,260
Ah...to answer my own question:

https://www.statesman.com/news/20181...occer-petition

Legally, would this new PAC be forced to start the petition all over - since people were mislead about the reason of the petition?
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2018, 10:02 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,319
So for an update for those not paying attention:

1) Columbus announced a whole lot of new stadium infrastructure stuff this week. Seems the sale is pretty well a done deal of the Crew franchise which should move the lawsuit in Ohio out of the way.

2) The rumor is we should have a signed contract between the city and PSV as early as next week. Play to most likely begin in 2021 when the new stadium opens. Outside chance we get a team a year earlier in 2020.

3) Garber (MLS commisioner) just today said that MLS will be the first professional sport in Austin.

So, this is looking pretty locked in now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2018, 10:45 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,260
Here's Garber's State of the League address from today:

https://www.mlssoccer.com/post/2018/...?autoplay=true

Austin is mentioned at roughly the 21:20 mark. It sounds pretty dang solid to me.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2018, 1:33 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoOgE View Post
So for an update for those not paying attention:

1) Columbus announced a whole lot of new stadium infrastructure stuff this week. Seems the sale is pretty well a done deal of the Crew franchise which should move the lawsuit in Ohio out of the way.

2) The rumor is we should have a signed contract between the city and PSV as early as next week. Play to most likely begin in 2021 when the new stadium opens. Outside chance we get a team a year earlier in 2020.

3) Garber (MLS commisioner) just today said that MLS will be the first professional sport in Austin.

So, this is looking pretty locked in now.
I'm curious: what is your source for the rumor that the deal could be signed as early as next week?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2018, 3:57 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O View Post
I'm curious: what is your source for the rumor that the deal could be signed as early as next week?
Both PSV representatives and those at City Hall have made several public comments regarding a mid-December agreement. There has been no word to the contrary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #155  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2018, 7:01 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVSAT View Post
Both PSV representatives and those at City Hall have made several public comments regarding a mid-December agreement. There has been no word to the contrary.
It's also been stated that Columbus has an end of year deadline to get everything through the CBUS council (new stadium plans approved, ownership in place etc) and that will require PSV to have a deal on the table from MLS because there is no way he's transferring rights to operate a club in Columbus for rights to a team with no approved location by the league.

Probably they will wait till after the Cup game tonight (and try and let the postive Columbus news be the headline to generate good will towards MLS) and then we'll get the announcement next week.

The question becomes do we enter with Miami in 2020 or do we hold off till 2021 and enter with Detroit/PHX/Sac winner? I think either are completely doable. I get the notion of starting fresh in McKalla place with all the buzz around a new stadium and permanent home... but part of me just wants games to go to a year earlier
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #156  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2018, 1:04 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVSAT View Post
Both PSV representatives and those at City Hall have made several public comments regarding a mid-December agreement. There has been no word to the contrary.
Oh, I don't doubt that it is close. I was just wondering if StoOgE had some inside knowledge. I know the guy leading negotiations on behalf of the City, and that is the impression I get from him as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #157  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2018, 3:42 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O View Post
Oh, I don't doubt that it is close. I was just wondering if StoOgE had some inside knowledge. I know the guy leading negotiations on behalf of the City, and that is the impression I get from him as well.
Just following MLS rumors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #158  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2018, 4:07 PM
Riverranchdrone Riverranchdrone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Austin
Posts: 713
They listed Austin as an expansion team during the MLS world Cup.
http://https://www.facebook.com/mls2...type=3&theater
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #159  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2018, 6:37 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,260
I just received my MLS-licenced, Austin FC gear in the mail from Fanatics!
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #160  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2018, 4:26 PM
eskimo33 eskimo33 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 9th Rock from the Sun
Posts: 158
Hooray, the development agreement is signed!
https://www.statesman.com/sports/201...in-mls-stadium
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.