Quote:
Originally Posted by geotag277
Not to reopen this debate, but again the term "east coast" is fairly loaded and refers to a number of things. It can refer to the technical coast, it can also refer to a specific region, mainly in the United States, which can include cities such as Philadelphia, which is located in the land locked state of Pennsylvania. If a community of people decide to include Toronto in that regional area, they aren't wrong, they have agreed amongst themselves on a definition for a regional area.
|
HERE WE GO!
No, it's wrong, because Canada and the US have different definitions of "east coast."
In America, "east coast" means the coastal and coastal-ish cities/states of the American northeast.
In Canada, it means the Maritimes + Newfoundland.
Any attempt to lump Toronto in with the American east coast is just an an attempt to get TO into the NYC/Philly/Boston/Washington set of cities, where it really doesn't belong anyway (it's more akin to Great Lakes cities like Detroit, Chicago, Cleveland, etc.)
And, Pennsylvania is landlocked, but Philly is less than 100 km from the ocean. Toronto is 740 kilometres from the ocean. In Canada, east coast is Atlantic Canada. In the US, it's the metropolitan sprawl of the eastern seaboard from New England through to Maryland/Delaware.
I know this is super pedantic, but calling Toronto "east coast" is geographically and culturally mistaken. Montreal MIGHT be a fit for that definition, if we're being really generous.
(EDIT: Yeah, I know I'm turning a parody thread into a real discussion of pedantic miniutiae.)