HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 1:01 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,884
New design for downtown park

https://www.thespec.com/news-story/8...downtown-park/

They all want a park.

But they have different ideas of what it should look like and differing views on whether a park and a dance club can coexist.

These are the details hashed out Tuesday night as 40 community members attended the unveiling of renderings and details of the long-awaited green space known as the John Rebecca Park, in the Beasley neighbourhood. Feedback from the meeting may be incorporated into the final plans.

The $2.5-million park will replace a parking lot, with construction beginning next year.

Ward 2 Coun. Jason Farr says the park — bounded by John, Rebecca, Catharine and King William streets — will appear on the map alongside the new Hamilton Police Service forensic building being built adjacent to the park and that both — via Beasley Park — are within easy walking distance to "restaurant row" on King William Street, creating "a greenway to the heart of the city."

The park plan includes groves of large shade trees, an expansive lawn, a vine-covered pergola, a spray pad and ice rink and a welcoming gateway.

Those at the meeting, held at the Beasley Community Centre, also asked for water fountains, street trees, a band shell and safe street crossings.

The current design includes the retention of a building that didn't appear in earlier drawings. That's Club Seventy-Seven, the dance club connected to two homicides.

It has been discovered the club may have heritage value. However, city representatives at the meeting said their intention is to acquire the Club Seventy-Seven property, which is zoned for parkland. No city official would confirm if it will expropriate the club.

Some raised concerns that club patrons will wind up in the park after closing time, participating in "undesirable activities."

Carol Priamo, who lives in the condos across the road from Club Seventy-Seven, is skeptical. She says the city has torn down other buildings with more significant heritage value than the club.

She and her husband bought their condo, believing the developer's promise that within a year, Club Seventy-Seven would be converted into a park. That was in 2010. She says the noise from the club is so loud they sold their condo at the front of the building to move into one at the back.

Chris Ritsma wants the park and the club.

"I like parks and I also like to dance and drink," says the 23-year-old who lives in Burlington, but hopes to move to Hamilton.

"There's more culture and heritage and uniqueness in Hamilton," says Ritsma.

A vibrant nightlife is important to him, but he is also looking ahead to having a family and wants room for his future children to run and play.

"I think parks are truly important to downtown centres."

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 1:06 AM
lachlanholmes's Avatar
lachlanholmes lachlanholmes is offline
Forever forward.
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelTown View Post
New design for downtown park

https://www.thespec.com/news-story/8...downtown-park/

They all want a park.

But they have different ideas of what it should look like and differing views on whether a park and a dance club can coexist.

These are the details hashed out Tuesday night as 40 community members attended the unveiling of renderings and details of the long-awaited green space known as the John Rebecca Park, in the Beasley neighbourhood. Feedback from the meeting may be incorporated into the final plans.

The $2.5-million park will replace a parking lot, with construction beginning next year.

Ward 2 Coun. Jason Farr says the park — bounded by John, Rebecca, Catharine and King William streets — will appear on the map alongside the new Hamilton Police Service forensic building being built adjacent to the park and that both — via Beasley Park — are within easy walking distance to "restaurant row" on King William Street, creating "a greenway to the heart of the city."

The park plan includes groves of large shade trees, an expansive lawn, a vine-covered pergola, a spray pad and ice rink and a welcoming gateway.

Those at the meeting, held at the Beasley Community Centre, also asked for water fountains, street trees, a band shell and safe street crossings.

The current design includes the retention of a building that didn't appear in earlier drawings. That's Club Seventy-Seven, the dance club connected to two homicides.

It has been discovered the club may have heritage value. However, city representatives at the meeting said their intention is to acquire the Club Seventy-Seven property, which is zoned for parkland. No city official would confirm if it will expropriate the club.

Some raised concerns that club patrons will wind up in the park after closing time, participating in "undesirable activities."

Carol Priamo, who lives in the condos across the road from Club Seventy-Seven, is skeptical. She says the city has torn down other buildings with more significant heritage value than the club.

She and her husband bought their condo, believing the developer's promise that within a year, Club Seventy-Seven would be converted into a park. That was in 2010. She says the noise from the club is so loud they sold their condo at the front of the building to move into one at the back.

Chris Ritsma wants the park and the club.

"I like parks and I also like to dance and drink," says the 23-year-old who lives in Burlington, but hopes to move to Hamilton.

"There's more culture and heritage and uniqueness in Hamilton," says Ritsma.

A vibrant nightlife is important to him, but he is also looking ahead to having a family and wants room for his future children to run and play.

"I think parks are truly important to downtown centres."

The club (building) takes away so much from the design of the park. Perfect design except for that awful building on the corner. No thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 1:09 AM
LRTfan LRTfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 773
new park, new 40 storey condo on the block to the north, new police building to the NE, new Beasley Park.... this should start to seed the revival of the parking lot hell district.... if both new building proposals at King William/Ferguson/Jarvis come to fruition all this will start to create new demand for more development and housing on the rest of the parking lots. No reason we can't see thousand of new residents and dozens more restaurants/cafes with patios on these streets in the years ahead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 1:10 AM
LRTfan LRTfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by scootaround View Post
The club (building) takes away so much from the design of the park. Perfect design except for that awful building on the corner. No thanks.

agreed....I have a hard time believing the city is suddenly going to start caring about heritage when it's related to this nondescript one storey slab.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 1:12 AM
LRTfan LRTfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 773
here's the old design....I much prefer it.
The commemorative section is no longer needed, so it can easily become a great lawn area.

https://d3fpllf1m7bbt3.cloudfront.ne...rk-concept.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 1:25 AM
realcity's Avatar
realcity realcity is offline
Bruatalism gets no respec
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Williamsville NY
Posts: 4,059
what is that the last dj club in downtown hamilton?
__________________
Height restrictions and Set-backs are for Nimbys and the suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 1:27 AM
davidcappi's Avatar
davidcappi davidcappi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,992
I like the new design. Lawns in urban parks end up gross and patchy, plus with global warming they require so much irrigation to stay alive. Happy they've dedicated so much space to trees.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 3:24 PM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by LRTfan View Post
agreed....I have a hard time believing the city is suddenly going to start caring about heritage when it's related to this nondescript one storey slab.
As someone who likes Club77 and Dirty Dogs occasionally, especially for their EDM bookings, I do not like the building there with the design of this park personally. I do think it takes away from the design, and if it remains a club, people will spill out and use the park for less than desirable reasons. I know this because I am in the age group that uses the club, and know people that would do this.

That said, it sucks to lose a real downtown club, and I hope Hamilton creates an environment that a safer and more interesting club scene can happen, because Hess just sucks, and Club77 should be moved, and there aren't even really any gay bars (coming from a straight dude with a few gay friends).

If Hamilton wants to be attracting young people, they cannot simply push out all slightly less desirable clubs, bars and nightlife attractions. I really like the park here, but we all don't want to go for a lonely stroll on a Friday night through an empty city, some of us want to dance.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 5:24 PM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,263
Can only think of a few bars and even few dance clubs that have had a lifespan in Hamilton for 30 years, most of not all have a shelf life. Let it operate until it doesn't, then move on to phase 2 of the park, whether that means a building or not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 5:33 PM
movingtohamilton movingtohamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 994
How about a park? No building...just a park.

The club scene can't be "created" by Hamilton. 77 can relocate and bring its loyal patrons with it.
__________________
Keep your hands and feet inside the virtual machine at all times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 6:04 PM
anactualalien anactualalien is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by movingtohamilton View Post
The club scene can't be "created" by Hamilton. 77 can relocate and bring its loyal patrons with it.
Agreed. Businesses can move more easily than a heritage building can, and the heritage value doesn't seem to be the reason people are opposed to demolition.

Even if the building has heritage value (dubious, considering what else gets torn down in the city as the lady in the article pointed out) simply letting 77 continue operating and spoiling the park for the general public until it shutters 10-15+ years from now is going to be a long and frustrating process for everyone and the city, considering how many complaints it has received up until this point. A place like this could hold on pretty much forever, which while laudable doesn't really seem like the best way to ensure the heritage value is maintained in the med-long term to any standard the public might appreciate.

It's one club almost entirely isolated from anything else matching it's character or the crowds it draws. I don't imagine most King William clientele head over there from the trendy restaurants, but I could be wrong.

If present owners are reporting that they are relocating to escape the noise how does that bode for interest in new condos in the parking lot desert? All for the sake of one shabby nightclub that could be easily relocated just slightly further to the east or north, in an equally grungy building?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 7:14 PM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by movingtohamilton View Post
How about a park? No building...just a park.

The club scene can't be "created" by Hamilton. 77 can relocate and bring its loyal patrons with it.
I did not imply that it can be created. But the city can create conditions that are conducive to different types of venues and clubs, and bars, and events is what I meant.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 9:50 PM
realcity's Avatar
realcity realcity is offline
Bruatalism gets no respec
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Williamsville NY
Posts: 4,059
or a city can make it difficult for a club to operate. Neon sign regulations, noise regs, SARCOA. A real city has nite clubs, not just HESS.
__________________
Height restrictions and Set-backs are for Nimbys and the suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 10:52 PM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by realcity View Post
or a city can make it difficult for a club to operate. Neon sign regulations, noise regs, SARCOA. A real city has nite clubs, not just HESS.
"No bro, clubs are for idiots, losers, and failures"

I question how people would so openly judge others just trying to have a good time, because it's not their idea of a good time.

I am a political advocate, that is a fan of LRT, development, and progressive policies that will bring Hamilton into the spotlight. I have a vision of Hamilton that is beyond what many even here see of Hamilton's future.

But I also like to dance at Club77, and hundreds that attend are normal people that are doing something others don't like.

AGAIN, I will reiterate, Club 77 does not belong here, and the park does. They should tear down that building for the sake of the park. BUT, that does mean the city needs to put effort into making the city a good environment for decent clubs. Going to Toronto everytime I want to see someone decent and party until 4am sucks, and many of my friends are turned off by Hamilton for that exact reason, among others.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted May 30, 2018, 11:31 PM
king10 king10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 2,764
Not sure the city has the money set aside to buy the owner of the club out. He’ll probably be asking for a lot of money. At least the parking lot they own. Also im more concerned about losing Lulu’s schwarma.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted May 31, 2018, 1:23 AM
davidcappi's Avatar
davidcappi davidcappi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,992
The part I was unclear about was wether they want to expropriate the business and incorporate the building into the park as a pavilion/gazebo, or if they want to have it be an actual establishment or business.

I think if they ripped the roof off of it, hermitage style with some seating and possibly washrooms inside, it could be a really interesting space for events.

I definitely agree with King and James though; all businesses have a shelf life. It's a shame that people who like to dance will be losing a venue, but that doesn't mean there won't eventually be a new one. With all of the growth downtown there are whole areas that could accommodate this kind of business that just are waiting to be discovered or connected to the rest of the city via new development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted May 31, 2018, 3:26 AM
realcity's Avatar
realcity realcity is offline
Bruatalism gets no respec
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Williamsville NY
Posts: 4,059
this would not be allowed in Hamilton.
__________________
Height restrictions and Set-backs are for Nimbys and the suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2018, 11:52 AM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,808
I think the safe injection site across the street will cause way more problems than the patrons of 77 ever will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2018, 5:26 AM
king10 king10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
I think the safe injection site across the street will cause way more problems than the patrons of 77 ever will.
Unfortunayely some patrons of 77 were invovled in a homicide so cant get much worse than that. Of course 99.9% of people who go arent there to cause problems.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2018, 1:27 PM
mattgrande's Avatar
mattgrande mattgrande is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by king10 View Post
Unfortunayely some patrons of 77 were invovled in a homicide so cant get much worse than that. Of course 99.9% of people who go arent there to cause problems.
How long has 77 been open? More than a decade, certainly. You're gonna need to throw a whole lot more 9s onto that percentage.

Also "some patrons?" Wasn't it a former employee?
__________________
Livin' At The Corner Of Dude And Catastrophe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:00 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.