Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila
I would love if the city grew through infill instead of sprawl, but that's not really an option either when so much of the city is historic and every new development triggers hysteria from the neighbors. Gosh, it's almost like the city can't house a growing population in a housing stock that hasn't grown for decades!
|
I'm a bit more optimistic. Housing prices are easing up now that airBnB restrictions are in place and there are enough large developments to keep up with the demand for now. I think the big difference between New Orleans and Austin is that the infrastructure (although not always maintained) exists for another few hundred thousand people. Transit would need to be improved, but ostensibly the funding would grow with the population.
Take Jefferson Parish, it's been stagnant population wise, but if they started to see infill like in the CBD, there's a huge amount of land in Elmwood, Causeway, Veterans, malls, etc. where you could plop down large apartment buildings.
In the city, if you look at Gentilly, St. Bernard, St. Roch, ninth ward, NO East, there are tons of vacant lots and unoccupied houses that could be filled if the demand is there. Same goes for St. Bernard and Plaquemines - you can get from Belle Chasse to the CBD in 20-30 minutes.