HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


    The St. Regis Chicago in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4681  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 10:17 AM
Bombardier Bombardier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoboZill4 View Post
This baby will be topped off before 2019? Yes!
They have around 20 floors to go. At 3 days per floor, they should be topped out some time in January if weather cooperates.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4682  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 4:13 PM
cozy cozy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 434
__________________
Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood and probably themselves will not be realized.

Last edited by cozy; Oct 23, 2018 at 4:20 PM. Reason: Link. Also: taken morning of october 23
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4683  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 5:00 PM
vexxed82's Avatar
vexxed82 vexxed82 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bombardier View Post
They have around 20 floors to go. At 3 days per floor, they should be topped out some time in January if weather cooperates.
By my count there are only about 14 floors left as of today. There are 11 floors per frustum (23 total for the top two frustums when you account for the middle transition floor) and with about 8 already poured (based on photos form last Thursday) on the second to last frustum, I the we're closer to the top.

That said, my contact said topping off would be in late February.

So based on these two bits of information are there more floors on the last two frustums than have been used in all the previous ones? Or perhaps the liquid dampers will take a lot more time to frame out and pour...
__________________
Nick Ulivieri | instagram | twitter | Facebook
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4684  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 5:32 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,445
The upper frustum looks a little different (longer?) than the others in this 2017 illustration:


Chicago Architecture Blog
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4685  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 5:46 PM
vexxed82's Avatar
vexxed82 vexxed82 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
The upper frustum looks a little different (longer?) than the others in this 2017 illustration:


Chicago Architecture Blog
Thanks for this! Yes, it's definitely taller than the other

Here I coped and pasted the top two frustums next to the previous two

__________________
Nick Ulivieri | instagram | twitter | Facebook
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4686  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 6:25 PM
Donnie77 Donnie77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 280
Looks to me like the final frustum is elongated at the top.

How much will the slush buckets delay the topping out if any?

Last edited by Donnie77; Oct 23, 2018 at 6:27 PM. Reason: Edit
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4687  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 6:33 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by vexxed82 View Post
Thanks for this! Yes, it's definitely taller than the other

Here I coped and pasted the top two frustums next to the previous two

Lol, guys, this diagram literally says exactly how big those sections are. The final setback is at 857'. The top of the building is 1194' meaning the final two frustrums are 337' tall. The first setback is at 593' meaning the middle set of frustrums are only 264' tall.

So not only are the final two frustums taller, they are quite a bit bigger at 73' taller than the lower section. That's almost 28% bigger than the middle section. It will be quite a noticeable design element, probably even from great distances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4688  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 6:42 PM
vexxed82's Avatar
vexxed82 vexxed82 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
Lol, guys, this diagram literally says exactly how big those sections are. The final setback is at 857'. The top of the building is 1194' meaning the final two frustrums are 337' tall. The first setback is at 593' meaning the middle set of frustrums are only 264' tall.

So not only are the final two frustums taller, they are quite a bit bigger at 73' taller than the lower section. That's almost 28% bigger than the middle section. It will be quite a noticeable design element, probably even from great distances.
I'm a visual learner
__________________
Nick Ulivieri | instagram | twitter | Facebook
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4689  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 6:55 PM
doomsdayprepper doomsdayprepper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by building_guy View Post
Just sitting back and watching the show Cozy. Haven't felt the need to comment, most of the stuff that gets posted on here is pretty funny, or just speculation at best. My source is first hand.
Since you have such a great "source", can you verify if the glass is going to change color with temperature?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4690  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 7:11 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by vexxed82 View Post
I'm a visual learner
Me too, that's how I noticed the numbers were right on the diagram! Lol

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4691  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 7:36 PM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: West Loop Gate, Chicago
Posts: 934
Quote:
Originally Posted by vexxed82 View Post
I'm a visual learner
haha! Same, thanks LVDW for preventing me from having to do math haha.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4692  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 7:57 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,093
Judging from those pictures the real height of this building is either 1,194' or 1,198'

It's a few feet but still a height increase
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4693  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 8:45 PM
jjk113 jjk113 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Judging from those pictures the real height of this building is either 1,194' or 1,198'

It's a few feet but still a height increase
...1198 ??!! .....will someone give them a broomstick to get the height to 1200 ?!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4694  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 8:47 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,093
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjk113 View Post
...1198 ??!! .....will someone give them a broomstick to get the height to 1200 ?!
Seriously, just go buy a metal rod at a hardware store and bolt it vertically to the roof.

Although since most of the world measures in meters I guess it doesn't really matter. It's well past supertall status.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4695  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 9:15 PM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjk113 View Post
...1198 ??!! .....will someone give them a broomstick to get the height to 1200 ?!
Seasonally, with a big enough snowfall...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4696  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 9:29 PM
Knightwing's Avatar
Knightwing Knightwing is offline
Cleared for takeoff
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bombardier View Post
They have around 20 floors to go. At 3 days per floor, they should be topped out some time in January if weather cooperates.
It's about 5 days per floor.
__________________
In fact, I am the College of Friendship, the University of Brotherly Love, the School for the Better Making of Men.......
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4697  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 11:13 PM
J_M_Tungsten's Avatar
J_M_Tungsten J_M_Tungsten is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,379
Tonight




Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4698  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 11:29 PM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
Great shots!!
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4699  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 8:01 PM
Donnie77 Donnie77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 280
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4700  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 9:56 PM
Barrelfish Barrelfish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 197
Curbed has a reasonably detailed construction update: "The structure has cleared its final architectural setback and has two frustum-shaped stacks left to pour. This final section will contain the skyscraper’s unoccupied blow-through floor, created to lessen wind loads and reduce building sway."

The developers also claim the glass didn't delay the schedule. We shall see!

https://chicago.curbed.com/2018/10/2...s-installation
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:04 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.