HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > General Discussion


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 6:30 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by CameronT120 View Post
I wonder if this renaming of the park would give them a toe hold in reclaiming the land? It could appear to be a step towards legitimizing ownership.
Excellent point. One not to be laughed at. It's almost like their "vindication."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 6:43 AM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
Why don't we just start deporting all the white people back to Europe while we're at it?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 6:50 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 22,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeCee View Post
Why don't we just start deporting all the white people back to Europe while we're at it?

And its not just Caucasian people. The Chinese, Japanese, East Indian, Filipinos etc etc who have immigrated to Vancouver in the last 100+ years all know and cherish that space as "Stanley Park".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 6:50 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,968
"Haida Gwaii" was a cluster of largely uninhabited islands back then, as it is now. It's identity hasn't really changed, which is why the name change (appropriately descriptive of the archipelago) was a good move. It sounds beautiful.

"WhyWhy" is quite something else... the significance of that chunk of forest we now call Stanley Park has exploded over the last 150 years, none of it having anything to do with natives. Heck, the aquarium probably covers a larger footprint than all the former villages on the peninsula combined.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 6:53 AM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
I suggest we honour Councillor Woodsworth with a First Nations name. How about "Raving Loon"?
X2. Now only to re-name the mayor in a similar fashion
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 6:59 AM
vitc's Avatar
vitc vitc is offline
mAd cRaZy CoDeR
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 357
Change the name? Over my dead body! There will be riots in Vancouver if this ever gets anywhere...

As for Haida Gwaii - I like that and have no problem with it.

Though I have to say the Mayor choose is words carefully. He said "suggestion" ( aka: Ya right lol ) instead of "idea" ( aka: hmm, you might be on to something ) - or am I giving him to much credit lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 7:26 AM
mooks28 mooks28 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 200
They've added the original names on the highway signs on the Sea to Sky Highway and it works quite well; very cool. I'd hope they aren't planning on dumping the Stanley Park name but rather adding the new names in various locations in the park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 7:41 AM
paradigm4 paradigm4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by usog View Post
Add him to the list of people we're blasting off then. Any others? Seriously, this whole first nations business is getting old...
This is a highly ignorant statement. I suggest you do some basic research about First Nations people and their historic and ongoing relationship with the rest of Canada, and in particular BC, where traditional territories were never ceded in treaties.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stingray2004 View Post
I do have a reasonable suggestion, however. Under all of the Stanley Park signage why not add: "Salish Name - Xwayxway". As a history buff, I would certainly appreciate that information and the Salish People's would also be recognized. Now there's a reasonable ground for compromise.
This is what I was thinking. It would be absurd to change the name, especially as the only reason given seems to be a trend of reclaiming Aboriginal titles. Haida Gwaii made total sense to me, and Salish Sea wasn't a big deal, but this is just PC overboard. I do agree though that an official recognition of the park's historic Aboriginal use seems to be a reasonable compromise - this information could certainly add to the character of the park and be placed on signage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 7:45 AM
WaxItYourself WaxItYourself is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 268
yeah I saw this earlier. As soon as I read it I pronounced it EXWayExWay. What an odd name for a park. And more than likely visitors are going to pronounce it that way as well. My suggestion would be to name sections of the park after their native locations and have small monuments with writeups describing each area and the way it is pronounced. Kind of like the aquarium. Maybe even take one of the locations and change it into a tourist attraction/museum where you get to walk around an actual native settlement. Kind of like Fort Langley.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 7:46 AM
ozonemania ozonemania is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 678
There's something fishy about the reporting quoted in the OP. I can't imagine any half-savvy politician 'enthusiastically endorsing' changing Stanley Park's name like this. I can see them endorsing looking at the proposal. And there are ways to name a place that have official, colloquial, and common names.

In fact, I think that the politically correct thing to do would be to encourage discussion about it, and then in the end decide maybe it shouldn't be done, rather than dismissing it outright.

It doesn't matter anyway, even if they change the name to Xwayxway, no one will refer it as such, except maybe for the First Nations peoples. I certainly won't.

Maybe it's just me, but moves like this by First Nations' leaders rub me the wrong way. I am all for our First Nations bretheren to be equal in all aspects with all citizens of Canada, but I only sense a message of 'you are less Canadian than we are, we were here before you' when they pull things like this. I agree that their path to equity, equality and independence is a difficult one, but jeez choose your battles wisely.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 7:50 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,141
they interviewed people on the news about it - and one of them they interviewed was an immigrant and I forget what she said but her response was the best - something along the lines of Canada is a nation that welcomes all people and some other stuff and she thinks stanley park should stay stanley park - anyway I agree with what she said - she said it so well
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 7:55 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
I agree. I have no problem that Queen Charlotte Islands got renamed to what it was originally called. But Stanley park was created by 'white people' even if they 'stole it'. It was never named XwayXway park, it didn't even exist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 7:59 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,829
My 2 cents:

Essentially almost everyone here has already said how I feel.

Simply changing the name of the park is a terrible idea. The village that existed before was only a small portion of the land area that is now the park.

I 100% support naming that area of the park after the original village and having some historic attributes added / built in its honour, but re-naiing the entire park and simply throwing away that name's cultural significance? No Thank You!

The very words "Stanley Park" are not only significant to all of the cultures in the Vancouver area, but it is also a nationally and internationally known trademark of the city.

I was indifferent to re-naiming the Queen Charlottes, but this is gone to far.

If we start going back hundreds and thousands of years, even the majority of nations / cities in Asia and Europe were all named something different than they are today and inhabited by different peoples, so technically they should all be re-named as well. Unfortunately (and fortunately is some respects) conquest has been the nature of humanity as far as history is written and no group of people are free of that crime (and there really is no such thing as a "pure" race, since everyone has mixed during these waves of conquest). Did you know that the natives themselves had continuous disputes over land boundaries (hence much more than 100% of BC is claimed by the natives) and slavery before the Europeans arrived? Even they were not innocent of such crimes.

Back to topic,

Stanley Park is a completely different entity than the village that was located within a small portion of it before.

Again, you can have a historical site established within the park bearing that villages name, but renaming the entire park? No way.

Everyone whom I have talked to about this today has laughed at the idea.

The funny thing is, even if they do re-name it, it will still be Stanley park to everyone.

I really wish one day that we had a politician that doesn't always play politically correct when it comes to a native issue, like any people, some of their suggestions are good, and some are terrible, this goes into the terrible category and I would love to hear someone from the city or province simply say "Re-naming the entire park, which is culturally significant to hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people, that is a stupid idea."
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 8:07 AM
gillty gillty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hyogo, Japan / Vancouver
Posts: 182
my 2 cents:
Its a distraction to take the headlines off the HST to something even more ludicrous like renaming Stanley Park.

of course mayor moonbeam's rep jumped right on it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 8:07 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,141
watching the news - the one first nations guy was talking about how the spirits of past generations like 1000's of years are in the trees blah blah blah - but aren't those trees only 100 or so years old? wasn't stanley park basically clear cut in the late 1800's?
__________________
belowitall

Last edited by SpongeG; Jul 2, 2010 at 8:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 11:50 AM
geoff's two cents geoff's two cents is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 504
In all fairness, naming (or re-naming) public places is usually controversial, and I respect the opinions here. I'll go on enjoying the park whether its name changes or not. Bi-lingual (with both names in equal size font) signage strikes me as a civil gesture of compromise.

SpongeG's post, however, reminds me of how utterly abysmal our country's educational curriculum in first nations history and culture is. We learn a thing or two about furs, fish, bison, the coureur des bois and smallpox, if we're lucky. It's absurd to think in this country that one basically has to be in college or be métis or first nations oneself to have a more well-rounded picture (I've heard the same said for our French language teaching, which is begun far too late for it to have any lasting impression on most people. Our tri- and quadra-lingual counterparts in Europe must wonder at that).

Though extremely inadequate by itself, bi-lingual naming might help spark wider interest in BC's local (colonial and postcolonial) histories and cultures. At any rate, I don't see how a formal recognition of the park's hybrid cultural heritage can be a bad thing.

Sorry for the somewhat off-topic rant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 12:15 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,867
whats the bitg deal about renaming the park?

new zealand has done this with mt Edgmont now called Taranaki
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 3:15 PM
nova9 nova9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
I agree. I have no problem that Queen Charlotte Islands got renamed to what it was originally called. But Stanley park was created by 'white people' even if they 'stole it'. It was never named XwayXway park, it didn't even exist.
i actually grew up learning the name haida gwaii before queen charlotte island and at one point, i thought both existed so i was surprised to learn that they were one in the same.

i would like to see the compromise of having the aboriginal name displayed alongside stanley park (with prominence going to stanley park, what is is famous for). if we were to reprsent first nations culture more properly, i would suggest an interpretive centre at lumberman's arch then - it's more educational and meaningful then just a slapped on name change.

side note, in terms of first nations history, don't forget that HMSC Discovery on the south part of stanley park, used to be a native burial ground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 3:49 PM
Overground's Avatar
Overground Overground is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 903
Changing the name of the park is absolutely ridiculous. I'll do everything in my power to prevent that from happening. This boy scout mayor even suggesting it's a good idea just goes to show how much we need him out of office asap. It's a world renowned park that everyone knows. Thank god we have Conservatives in Ottawa to prevent this from happening. This is akin to changing the name of Central Park in NYC to Lenape Park. This is the left wing and their systematic destruction of Canada's European history to serve their guilt and absurd personality defect called political correctness.

I don't have a problem with them renaming that portion of the park, where the village used to be located, as a native name. But renaming the whole park should not ever be done. Anyone who thinks it should is out of touch with Canada's rich and historical past, which includes European heritage. What's next, change the name of Vancouver, Broadway, Granville, Fraser, Robson, Grouse? That's something these morons would do, change the name of marketable and "world class" Vancouver to something else.


When Lord Stanley officially dedicated the park he said, 'to the use and enjoyment of peoples of all colours, creeds, and customs, for all time. I name thee, Stanley Park.'

Pretty good words coming from an old white guy in 1899, eh?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 4:36 PM
ozonemania ozonemania is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overground View Post
Thank god we have Conservatives in Ottawa to prevent this from happening. This is akin to changing the name of Central Park in NYC to Lenape Park. This is the left wing and their systematic destruction of Canada's European history to serve their guilt and absurd personality defect called political correctness.
Why do people always jump on partisan name calling with any issue? What does a Conservative in Ottawa have anything to do with this? Oh god, channel your hatred elsewhere please.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > General Discussion
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:15 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.