HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5261  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 6:05 AM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
How's the Macleod bridge over 22X looking? Any signs of being done soon?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5262  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 6:23 AM
Jimby's Avatar
Jimby Jimby is offline
not a NIMBY
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 8,796
Nice Rocky Mountain vistas on the overpasses. I kept it down to close to 100, but I didn't see any police. I was wondering if Foothills Industrial traffic is going to see rush hour heading east instead of west? Now Glenmore E. needs a major upgrade.
I saw a woman on a cell phone get caught at Shawnessy and Macleod.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5263  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 6:30 AM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I really love the colour of the walls, by far my favorite part of the project. Curious to see how long the paint ("sealer" or something I think it said in schedule 18?) lasts and how fast the repair process is when somebody hits the wall. I'll be legitimately annoyed if somebody hits the 114 Ave walls, they are gorgeous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5264  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 1:48 PM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 10,083
We'll I'm going to finally check it out this morning. Have a meeting in crossfield, so I'm going to cut across Anderson/deer foot/114 and take it around the east side. Curious to see how busy it is
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5265  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 4:34 PM
DoubleK DoubleK is offline
Near Generational
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey View Post
How's the Macleod bridge over 22X looking? Any signs of being done soon?
Still on temporary signal lights, but the widening is functional and in service.

I didn't notice if they installed permanent foundations for the new signals and haven't seen anyone on site for the two days that I have been back from Phoenix.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5266  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 4:54 PM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks. After 2 mornings now, I think there might be a tad less volume on Deerfoot at McKnight around 8 am. Can't say for sure yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5267  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 5:07 PM
You Need A Thneed's Avatar
You Need A Thneed You Need A Thneed is offline
Construction Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Castleridge, NE Calgary
Posts: 5,892
I know there is significantly more volume on Stoney in the mornings - especially noticable between 16th Ave and 17th Ave.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5268  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 5:29 PM
outoftheice outoftheice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 911
Just curious if anybody knows if a different standard of street lighting was used on this portion of Stoney Trail?? Flying into Calgary at night, you can see that there is a huge amount of light pollution being generated from the street lights on the new section of Stoney. Compare this to the lights on Deerfoot Trail or the NW portion or Stoney which primarily cast their light down on the ground and you can really notice a difference. I know there was a big push by the City of Calgary a few years back to combat light pollution and switch to a different style of street light. Has this initiative gone by the way-side or is Stoney Trail an exception to the rule because it's a Provincial road and there for does not have to conform to City of Calgary standards?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5269  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 5:34 PM
DoubleK DoubleK is offline
Near Generational
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,447
^^ Completely different style of lights. Deerfoot uses a lot of High-mast lighting that have reflectors on them to direct the light down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5270  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 7:07 PM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Redford, McIver, Whitney at signing. Global.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5271  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 7:10 PM
lineman's Avatar
lineman lineman is offline
power to the people!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Crescent Heights, Calgary
Posts: 864
Correct. City Roads vs Alberta Transportation standards.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5272  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 7:12 PM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The light pollution is regrettable, but Stoney is lit so much better than Deerfoot it's not even funny. Massively safer. Not to mention a good 20% of the lights on Deerfoot are burned out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5273  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 7:29 PM
5seconds 5seconds is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 935
...

Last edited by 5seconds; May 15, 2019 at 4:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5274  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 7:36 PM
5seconds 5seconds is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 935
...

Last edited by 5seconds; May 15, 2019 at 4:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5275  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 7:48 PM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is that on top of the $340.7M paid to the Nation? To me $1.9B sounds way low for the ultimate so it must be opening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5276  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 7:53 PM
DoubleK DoubleK is offline
Near Generational
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,447
This is awesome news.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5277  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 7:54 PM
5seconds 5seconds is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 935
...

Last edited by 5seconds; May 15, 2019 at 4:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5278  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 7:55 PM
H.E.Pennypacker's Avatar
H.E.Pennypacker H.E.Pennypacker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5seconds View Post
Yep, the SW deal is signed. Chief Whitney stated that it is probably the most important modern event in the history of the Nation.

Now we wait for the federal government.
Pretty historic day for both sides - the ring road is, what, 50 years in the making?

Getting this deal signed was one of the biggest obstacles to overcome... Glad it's done now and it appears there isn't any lingering animosity between the parties

What's the timeline for the feds to give the green light? IIRC it could take up to 2 or 3 years? I'd like to think that with 3/4 of the road already done that this won't take particularly long
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5279  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 8:18 PM
5seconds 5seconds is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 935
...

Last edited by 5seconds; May 15, 2019 at 4:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5280  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2013, 8:23 PM
DoubleK DoubleK is offline
Near Generational
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,447
This has to go through a CEAA assessment. 24 months minimum.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:10 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.