HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


1000M in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 10:26 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
Cool CHICAGO | 1000M (1000 S Michigan) | 805 FT | 73 FLOORS

1000 S Michigan Avenue:


Last edited by Steely Dan; Sep 22, 2016 at 9:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 10:30 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,090
O yes...
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 10:38 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
Remember that rather blocky (Destefano?) building proposed for this site? Another case where the bust may have actually led to a better result. Can't wait to see the actual renderings and details of this Jahn supertall (finally he gets one in his hometown). Also interesting to see the mix of condos/apartments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 10:39 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,349

I don't believe what is happening to the South Loop this past week. This has to be a dream. Are we in The Matrix?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 10:40 PM
pilsenarch pilsenarch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 886
Wow. It appears as if the entire top of the tower is slightly rotated... AND cantilevered over the building to the south...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2015, 1:37 AM
Loopy's Avatar
Loopy Loopy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilsenarch View Post
Wow. It appears as if the entire top of the tower is slightly rotated... AND cantilevered over the building to the south...
Yes. I can't wait to see the renderings! I'm trying to picture it in 3D.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 10:42 PM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,909
Damn, SUPER excited about this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 10:51 PM
Domer2019 Domer2019 is offline
Biased in a good way?
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 264
Has this been officially announced to any degree yet? Was it mentioned at the meeting?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 10:54 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,090
Dear all other developers stop proposing so the ones coming now can be built.
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 11:01 PM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,741
Wow any links [info] on this one?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 11:05 PM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
506 units, 598 parking spaces
fml.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 11:11 PM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,647
If the Calatrava and multiple failed projects of the last decade taught us anything it's I'LL BELIEVE WHEN I SEE IT.

Just saying. I mean, 1,000 feet... in the South Loop? No way. I foresee drastic scaling back on this one after massive opposition.

Far less units, 600 feet, and more parking. Mark my words.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2015, 2:28 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
If the Calatrava and multiple failed projects of the last decade taught us anything it's I'LL BELIEVE WHEN I SEE IT.

Just saying. I mean, 1,000 feet... in the South Loop? No way. I foresee drastic scaling back on this one after massive opposition.

Far less units, 600 feet, and more parking. Mark my words.

Possibly, but lets also realize that we're dealing with different alderman now.

This is no longer the 2nd Ward and Fioretti isn't around.

Because of gerrymandering, this is the 4th Ward, Will Burns. He's the same guy who got Vue53 through in Hyde Park against the NIMBYs there.

The South Loop now has 3 aldermanic representatives; Dowell, Burns, and Solis.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2015, 2:47 AM
rgolch's Avatar
rgolch rgolch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
If the Calatrava and multiple failed projects of the last decade taught us anything it's I'LL BELIEVE WHEN I SEE IT.

Just saying. I mean, 1,000 feet... in the South Loop? No way. I foresee drastic scaling back on this one after massive opposition.

Far less units, 600 feet, and more parking. Mark my words.
You speak much truth, and I very much agree that I'll believe it when I see it. The only thing I'd say to counter that is that not only are these proposals happening earlier in the cycle of this boom, the last boom was killed by the worst recession in recent history, caused by the subprime mortgage crisis. What's more, the Spire was an insanely ambitious proposal. A tower barely breaking 1000 ft is hardly on par with the Spire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 11:11 PM
Domer2019 Domer2019 is offline
Biased in a good way?
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by wierdaaron View Post
fml.
But how are else the penthouse owners going to park their collection? Perhaps Jay Leno will put down a deposit...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 11:16 PM
Ned.B Ned.B is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 608
^^^At least it has apartments all the way down to the second floor on Michigan. If they are going for the high end residential market, most of those people will expect at least one parking space. That's probably just reality.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 11:18 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Monterey CA
Posts: 4,204
OMG!! Totally missed this one!!!! What the what??!!
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 11:23 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,780
Christmas came early
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 11:24 PM
wrab's Avatar
wrab wrab is offline
Deerhoof Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,670
Oh, sweet!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2015, 11:31 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,780
Can't wait for the renders on this one

Last edited by rlw777; Sep 24, 2015 at 12:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.