HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11481  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2016, 5:33 PM
The Flying Dutchman The Flying Dutchman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 206
Hello Texas mod. This is a Streetlight development (A Dallas-based development company). So figures you would upload it here, and welcome!

Clarification - Maker's Quarter is a district, but sometimes developers will opt to name their line of products according to the district they are in.

Broadstone - Maker's Quarter; StreetLights - Maker's Quarter, etc...

News outlets get this part wrong all the time, and it grinds my gears. End rant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11482  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2016, 9:27 PM
Leo the Dog Leo the Dog is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Lower-48
Posts: 4,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDCAL View Post
Mass transit in this city is a complete joke. KPBS/NPR have been reporting how backwards the compass card is in San Diego

This is EXACTLY why, despite living downtown, I never take the trolley or other mass transit. You either have to buy a day or month pass, you can't just store money on the card and use it as you go along like every other city in the country. This discourages "occasional riders," people who have cars but would otherwise occasionally ride public transit. Why would something so technologically easy to fix be left like this for literally years? It's this type of thing that makes me wonder if San Diego is ever capable coming into the 21st century. Even small, obvious things can't get done here. Pathetic.
I'd honestly expect mass transit numbers to decline with the rising popularity of rideshare technology. I haven't taken the trolley in 2 years now, because I'd rather spend a couple extra bucks and save an hour of time with Uber/Lyft. Once driverless automation hits the roads in 10-20 years, I'm guessing many transit organizations will face major budget shortcomings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11483  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2016, 10:10 PM
The Flying Dutchman The Flying Dutchman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo the Dog View Post
I'd honestly expect mass transit numbers to decline with the rising popularity of rideshare technology. I haven't taken the trolley in 2 years now, because I'd rather spend a couple extra bucks and save an hour of time with Uber/Lyft. Once driverless automation hits the roads in 10-20 years, I'm guessing many transit organizations will face major budget shortcomings.
Automated/electric cars still take up the same amount of road space as regular cars. There is even talk of them causing *more* congestion since they can just circle the block and they still need a place to park when idle... Still it's a grey area. I don't think transit will find itself in dire straits for a number of reasons. First, if gridlock occurs and preferential treatment is given to transit as we are already seeing (buses can use express lanes, dedicated lanes; the trolley is grade-separated, etc.) then the time savings parity of single-occupancy vehicles may actually diminish dramatically. Of course, if the cost of owning/timesharing a car (whether automated or not) becomes prohibitively expensive, as automated cars are practically guaranteed to make insurance so high (due to near-perfect safety marks), then congestion might not be such a problem, but personal vehicles will cost $$$$. The economics is just really unclear in my opinion, but we are sure headed for some major tectonic shifts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11484  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2016, 2:17 AM
Bertrice Bertrice is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: PB
Posts: 203
horton plaza video. not very long


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjkQoWkWLKE
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11485  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2016, 4:58 PM
nezbn22 nezbn22 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 136
Anyone have any renderings for this?

http://civicsd.com/images/stories/do..._-_1.26.16.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11486  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2016, 6:19 PM
Streamliner's Avatar
Streamliner Streamliner is offline
Frequent Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 571
Quote:
Originally Posted by nezbn22 View Post
Anyone have any renderings for this?

http://civicsd.com/images/stories/do..._-_1.26.16.pdf
I couldn't find any renderings, just this site talking about the property.

But a 420-foot, 36-story building in that location would be really big for the area. For comparison, the old Sempra building a block away is only 292 feet tall. It would have views of Balboa Park and planes flying into SAN.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11487  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2016, 8:00 PM
spoonman's Avatar
spoonman spoonman is offline
SD/OC
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,430
Here is a rendering...boom

http://mlasd.com/on-the-table/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11488  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2016, 11:04 PM
Streamliner's Avatar
Streamliner Streamliner is offline
Frequent Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 571
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonman View Post
Here is a rendering...boom

http://mlasd.com/on-the-table/
Thanks!



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11489  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2016, 11:47 PM
The Flying Dutchman The Flying Dutchman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonman View Post
Here is a rendering...boom

http://mlasd.com/on-the-table/
'bOOmMan'
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11490  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2016, 12:38 AM
SDfan's Avatar
SDfan SDfan is offline
Registered San Diegan
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,055
Nice. I hope this moves. The economy is flagging a bit, and I'm worried a recession will close-line some of our best projects (lookin' at you the Block).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11491  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2016, 4:51 AM
SDCAL SDCAL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 882
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo the Dog View Post
I'd honestly expect mass transit numbers to decline with the rising popularity of rideshare technology. I haven't taken the trolley in 2 years now, because I'd rather spend a couple extra bucks and save an hour of time with Uber/Lyft. Once driverless automation hits the roads in 10-20 years, I'm guessing many transit organizations will face major budget shortcomings.
So San Diego should avoid paying $100,000 for a basic decade-old technology that every other city has because driverless automation will lower mass transit use in 10-20 years? My post wasn't about some big future mass transit investment, it was about a basic concept that could be enacted right away and help the current situation. I live close to a trolley stop, I'd use it if they had this basic service.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11492  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2016, 4:57 PM
aerogt3 aerogt3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Flying Dutchman View Post
Automated/electric cars still take up the same amount of road space as regular cars.
Automated cars could dramatically increase road capacities, because they can drive safely with virtually no distance to the car in front. They would also ease parking restrictions because capacity would no longer need to be located within lazy people's walking distance.

At 70 mph, the "safe" distance between cars at 70 mph is ~300 feet (DMV). Considering the average sedan is 15 feet long, reducing following distances from 300 feet to 15 feet would increase the lane capacity by roughly a factor of ten (for the same driving speeds.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11493  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2016, 7:02 PM
spoonman's Avatar
spoonman spoonman is offline
SD/OC
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,430
^This.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11494  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2016, 7:05 PM
spoonman's Avatar
spoonman spoonman is offline
SD/OC
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by nezbn22 View Post
Anyone have any renderings for this?

http://civicsd.com/images/stories/do..._-_1.26.16.pdf
This project will be great, as it will help fill in an area that has been stagnant for a long time. It will also provide more height closer to the 5 freeway, which will create a more dramatic view for those driving south on 5 into DT.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11495  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2016, 11:07 PM
The Flying Dutchman The Flying Dutchman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerogt3 View Post
Automated cars could dramatically increase road capacities, because they can drive safely with virtually no distance to the car in front. They would also ease parking restrictions because capacity would no longer need to be located within lazy people's walking distance.

At 70 mph, the "safe" distance between cars at 70 mph is ~300 feet (DMV). Considering the average sedan is 15 feet long, reducing following distances from 300 feet to 15 feet would increase the lane capacity by roughly a factor of ten (for the same driving speeds.)
Unless you're in urban areas, esp. downtown, where cars are already bumper to bumper in some cases. All that highway traffic ends up somewhere, anyway...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11496  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2016, 4:42 PM
Streamliner's Avatar
Streamliner Streamliner is offline
Frequent Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 571
Lindbergh Field has record 20M passengers
San Diego Union-Tribune
Lori Weisberg
Jan. 28, 2015

Quote:
San Diego International Airport has reached a new milestone, surpassing 20 million passengers in 2015.

Credit an improving economy, most notably a still rebounding tourism industry, for helping boost traffic in and out of the airport, both domestically and internationally.

In all, 20,081,258 passengers boarded and disembarked planes at Lindbergh Field last year — a 7 percent increase over the more than 18.7 million passengers in 2014, the airport reported.

-------

Put into perspective, LAX, the nation’s second-busiest airport, reported a record 74.5 million travelers in 2015, up 5.6 percent from the previous year.

---------

And British Airways, which has seen high demand for its nonstop London flights during the summer, is moving from a smaller 275-seat Boeing 777 aircraft to a 747 that will accommodate more than 300 passengers, Brown said.

It will be cool to see these landing over downtown again:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11497  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2016, 6:46 PM
Derek Derek is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 9,543
I didn't read the whole article, so maybe this was addressed, but don't 747s have some kind of load restriction leaving SAN due to the short runway? I remember the original BA route to London made a stop in Phoenix before continuing on.
__________________
Portlandia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11498  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2016, 9:16 PM
The Flying Dutchman The Flying Dutchman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 206
Has anyone flown 1st Class on BA? I hear the food is legendary. I've flown with steerage, and it was a nice flight. Very professional staff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11499  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2016, 2:57 AM
HurricaneHugo's Avatar
HurricaneHugo HurricaneHugo is offline
Category Five
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,994
Chargers staying in SD for at least 2016:

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/...an-diego-2016/

Hopefully we can get a stadium done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11500  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2016, 4:13 PM
SanDiego SanDiego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek View Post
I didn't read the whole article, so maybe this was addressed, but don't 747s have some kind of load restriction leaving SAN due to the short runway? I remember the original BA route to London made a stop in Phoenix before continuing on.
It was a restriction on landing in San Diego because the weight of the plane was too much to stop on the runway. Back in the early 2000s BA would drop off luggage and passengers in Phoenix to lighten the load.

I wonder if the runway has improvements (I know it's been worked on several times after that) or the aircraft has improved?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:51 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.