HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2007, 5:10 AM
Jaroslaw's Avatar
Jaroslaw Jaroslaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seoul
Posts: 1,792
Britain's Lost Cities (post-war destruction of old buildings)

http://entertainment.timesonline.co....cle3050987.ece

Bradford before and after:





Times Online
December 14, 2007
Britain's Lost Cities by Gavin Stamp

What the Luftwaffe began, arrogant, philistine town planners finished off. Now a new study names the guilty men, Stephen McClarence says


EYEING UP NEW ARRIVALS AT Bradford Interchange station is a full-length photograph of J.B. Priestley, one of the city's most famous sons. He is dressed in full Priestley uniform — pipe, trilby, belted overcoat — and has a characteristically canny glint in his eye. The picture must have been taken 20 years or so after he returned to Bradford in 1933 for his English Journey, that forerunner of Orwell's The Road to Wigan Pier, but with more comfortable hotels.

Priestley found a city with “a carved-out-of-the-Pennines look... entirely without charm, though not altogether ugly” and noticed many changes since his childhood, with “new streets where once there were old pubs and shops”.

What would he say if he could go back today? Would he echo the architectural critic Gavin Stamp in Britain's Lost Cities, an engrossing, no-punches-pulled denunciation of the wilful destruction of our urban landscape since the 1930s? Stamp describes today's Bradford, one of the 19 cities whose fate he chronicles, as a pale shadow of “the dense, complex and lively pre-war city recorded in old photographs”. Seething with elegant outrage, he hits out at planners who have vandalised so much of its almost exclusively Victorian fabric.

They sent in the bulldozers and wrecking balls, replacing arcades, markets and warehouses with buildings that were either dreary or dreadful and which systematically squandered the city's dignity. “As in other cities,” he writes, “the inadequate and unnecessary postwar rebuilding of Bradford now seems a criminal waste of money, energy and materials.”

Stamp's thesis is familiar, but it has rarely been so combatively expressed. He tours the country from Dundee to Plymouth, via Liverpool, Bristol, Norwich, Portsmouth, London and others, hurling abuse at engineers, developers and politicians.

Until the 20th century, he points out, change in cities “tended to be piecemeal, occasional and organic”, even though Victorian railway companies ruthlessly slashed their lines through anything in their path.

The religion of the motor car changed all that. Councils dismembered their cities to build ring roads, flyovers and car parks. They used any excuse for demolition — that old buildings had a limited life; that Victorian architecture was at best unfashionable, at worst sinfully ugly; that the mess left by Luftwaffe raids needed tidying up.

The Nazis became convenient scapegoats for plans already under way. Coventry's medieval Butcher Row was razed in 1936, four years before the first bombers flew in. It had become, the Lord Mayor sniffed, “a blot on the city”. Planners in Canterbury welcomed the wartime destruction and set about their own.

Naming names, Stamp tells a tale of neglect, incompetence, philistinism and sheer bloody-minded malice, encapsulated in a comment by Herbert Manzoni, the City Engineer and Surveyor of Birmingham from 1935 to 1963: “I have never been very certain as to the value of tangible links with the past,” he said in 1957. “As to Birmingham's buildings, there is little of real worth in our architecture. Its replacement should be an improvement, provided we keep a few monuments as museum pieces to past ages.”

City after city was blighted with modernist buildings that, in an almost totalitarian way, were obsessed with function and efficiency and often looked like multistorey car parks, even when they weren't.

Nowhere suffered more than Newcastle, where the council leader, T.Dan Smith, a friend of “that corrupt architect” John Poulson, announced a vision of his city as “the Milan of the North”. As Stamp balefully notes: “What he achieved... was more like the Croydon of the North.”

Here and elsewhere, conservationists protested, but, despite such successes in the 1960s as the rescue of StPancras station in London (the subject of great jubilation recently), it was only in the 1970s that they really began to make an impact.

By then irreparable damage had been done. Keith Waterhouse summed things up in 1975 in two sentences that will resonate with anyone who has ever sat narcoleptically through a local council meeting: “I would put most of the blame on the councillors who invite and encourage the laying-waste of their own townships. The trouble is that many of them are not very bright.”

Their legacy is the desperate sense of loss engendered by Stamp's book, with its 200 stylishly presented archive photographs. I lost count of the number of pictures of smart, historic, charming streets captioned: “Every building in this photograph has since disappeared.”

In Bradford, it is often hard to find a reference point for many of the pictures. Step out of the Interchange station (“tawdry” in Stamp's opinion) and you are overwhelmed by an urban motorway, sending pedestrians trudging over bridges or through underpasses smelling of urine.

A city centre once packed with handsomely heavyweight buildings has had its Victorian integrity gradually picked apart, as though in a death wish or out of the “self-hatred for their industrial past” shared by many Northern cities.

The frontispiece of Stamp's book shows Darley Street, Bradford, where the Kirkgate Market, with its welcoming human scale, was demolished in 1973, despite protests by Priestley and his fellow-Bradfordian David Hockney. Its replacement is a shopping mall of awesome brutalism.

Not all is lost, however. The city's spirit survives, bracing and businesslike. Lister's Mill, once the world's biggest silk factory (“as breathtaking as Versailles,” The Times once said) has a bright, ambitious future converted into smart apartments and offices.

The sturdy warehouses of the Little Germany area, great cliff faces of buff stone with sculpted eagles glowering from parapets, are being regenerated. The Wool Exchange, with its friezes of bewhiskered wool-industry worthies, has become the grandest of Waterstone's bookstores.

And the refurbishment of the Great Victoria Hotel is recapturing much of its former confidence. Here at least, Priestley's ghost would be happy, thumbs hooked in waistcoat pockets, propping up the bar, chuntering for England.

Britain's Lost Cities by Gavin Stamp
Aurum, £25; 186pp
__________________
Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2007, 2:05 AM
LSyd's Avatar
LSyd LSyd is offline
Red October standing by
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Columbia/Sumter, SC
Posts: 16,913
interesting.

-
__________________
"The vapors! The fainting couch! Those heartless elitists are burning down the plantation with their logic and arithmetic!"

-fflint
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2007, 3:46 AM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
illwaukee/crooklyn
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: rome
Posts: 8,518
Hey, at least those UK tear downs made way for new buildings. Most American cities' dowtowns are encircled by belts of surface parking or expressway where once vibrant and dense city once existed. I could think of hundreds of examples of before and after pics for Milwaukee alone that would consitute the after picture being nothing but a grassy lot, expressway or parking lot/garage. I think it would be very nice if the very least the US's urban renewal phase gave us were brutalist buildings with vibrant retail and occupancy in place of what was razed.

Maybe I'm being a total asshole, a 'My dad can beat up your dad' person, but I just can't feel terribly sorry for those in the UK. Yes, the developers were horrible, but at least they developed stuff.

This is Milwaukee at the turn of the century. Every single building in this photo is destroyed; most of them were demolished for a freeway, others are surface lots, a small handful have new buildings on them.
__________________
disregard women. acquire finances.

Last edited by CGII; Dec 24, 2007 at 4:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2007, 4:32 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
^ That's a very good point, and those are very similar thoughts to the ones I was having when I read the above article.

What happened to American cities is about 10 times worse than what has been described above.
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2007, 5:08 PM
John Hinds's Avatar
John Hinds John Hinds is offline
Senior Committee
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: DisUnited Queendom
Posts: 4,163
Having nothing is better than having the kind of post war developments we had in the UK.
We're still spending billions fixing all the fuck-ups they did in the 60's in the name of modernism.

Trouble is we're replacing them all with new fuck-ups and out of town shopping centres that make things 10x worse.
__________________

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2007, 5:41 PM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
illwaukee/crooklyn
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: rome
Posts: 8,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonny 5 View Post
Having nothing is better than having the kind of post war developments we had in the UK.
We're still spending billions fixing all the fuck-ups they did in the 60's in the name of modernism.

Trouble is we're replacing them all with new fuck-ups and out of town shopping centres that make things 10x worse.
You'd rather have this?


islandia.is
__________________
disregard women. acquire finances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2007, 7:13 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 13,095
^The crazy thing about that picture of Houston is that most all the spots are filled!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2007, 7:45 PM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
illwaukee/crooklyn
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: rome
Posts: 8,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by PA Pride View Post
^The crazy thing about that picture of Houston is that most all the spots are filled!!
Well, yes, but only after half of a century.
__________________
disregard women. acquire finances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2007, 2:55 AM
Rufus's Avatar
Rufus Rufus is offline
Person
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 247
OMG Houston! What's funny (or sad) is that there is even a large parking garage in that sea of surface lots, on the far right-center, with islands of one story buildings here and there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2007, 5:05 AM
marcus's Avatar
marcus marcus is offline
marcus
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 798
when i first saw that photo of Houston my first thought was or a distruction zone after a tsunami!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2007, 9:46 AM
Patrick's Avatar
Patrick Patrick is offline
Desert Dweller
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGII View Post
Well, yes, but only after half of a century.
HAAHAHAH OMG.
That Houston pic is insane!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2007, 2:02 PM
LSyd's Avatar
LSyd LSyd is offline
Red October standing by
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Columbia/Sumter, SC
Posts: 16,913
yay, it's the weekly "let's get off topic and bash Houston (or Atlanta) thread!!!"

-
__________________
"The vapors! The fainting couch! Those heartless elitists are burning down the plantation with their logic and arithmetic!"

-fflint
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2007, 6:13 PM
Upward's Avatar
Upward Upward is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGII View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by PA Pride
The crazy thing about that picture of Houston is that most all the spots are filled!!
Well, yes, but only after half of a century.
I thought what he meant was that almost all the parking spaces were in use in the photo. That's certainly what I noticed. You have to wonder how the drivers of such a large number of cars could all be inside those buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2007, 7:41 PM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by LSyd View Post
yay, it's the weekly "let's get off topic and bash Houston (or Atlanta) thread!!!"

-
You're always complaining about this. But this is a forum about cities and urban developments. And these particular places are textbook examples of how not to build a city. It's perfectly logical that Houston will be referenced as a "how not to" almost as often as New York is referenced as a "how to". As large Western cities go, they are opposites and extremes, and thus will figure regularly into conversation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2007, 7:48 PM
WilliamTheArtist's Avatar
WilliamTheArtist WilliamTheArtist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Posts: 800
My god, I have never seen such an abomination. I just keep looking at that photo in disbelief. I am stunned. What is all of that? How can that be like that?
__________________
Tulsa
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2007, 7:52 PM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
The great thing about Europe is that there are lots of small cities and towns that are urban and have retained their Industrial age or even Medieval building stock. Large cities have often suffered, mostly from urban renewal in the UK. Germany suffered a worse fate, as it wasn't their own poor planning that led to the destruction of most central cities, but Hitler's war.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2007, 8:22 PM
LSyd's Avatar
LSyd LSyd is offline
Red October standing by
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Columbia/Sumter, SC
Posts: 16,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post
You're always complaining about this. But this is a forum about cities and urban developments. And these particular places are textbook examples of how not to build a city. It's perfectly logical that Houston will be referenced as a "how not to" almost as often as New York is referenced as a "how to". As large Western cities go, they are opposites and extremes, and thus will figure regularly into conversation.
they're on such extreme opposites (no zoning vs. a plan over 150 years old and lots of zoning for what was once the world's largest city) that there really isn't a comparison...

-
__________________
"The vapors! The fainting couch! Those heartless elitists are burning down the plantation with their logic and arithmetic!"

-fflint
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2007, 10:08 PM
Rufus's Avatar
Rufus Rufus is offline
Person
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally Posted by LSyd View Post
yay, it's the weekly "let's get off topic and bash Houston (or Atlanta) thread!!!"

-
I do not see any bashing here. Rather, one person posted a picture of Houston to compare to cities in the UK like Bradford, and then other people responded in shock at how much of Houston's downtown was devoted to parking after 60s urban renewal happened.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2008, 12:05 PM
malec's Avatar
malec malec is offline
Rrrraaaahhhhh!!!!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,069
Lol, that picture with the parking lots is crazy! I wonder how many cars are in that one picture
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2008, 3:15 AM
dagobert dagobert is offline
Onkel Dagobert
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Entenhausen
Posts: 116
Can you spot the difference?
Hiroshima



Huston
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.