HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2012, 12:39 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant
Posts: 6,865
Difficult question - One way of expressing density is using FSR. So I was wondering what the density of Downtown Vancouver would be if we expressed it using FSR?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2012, 1:08 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
You can't measure the density of downtown via FSR. FSR is a measure that's useful in comparing sites. It can be useful in comparing large areas that are a part of a area rezoning but that's about it. The FSR of downtown itself if one could calculate it would be a disappointing low number.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2012, 1:25 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant
Posts: 6,865
If you added up the total amount of property that each building sits on, then calculated the amount of floorspace, would that not give you an average FSR for DT Vancouver? Obviously you wouldn't include streets, sidewalks, parks,etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2012, 1:36 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
If you were calculating the FSR of downtown though you would have to include all the area, parks, sidwalks, roads etc other wise you are asking for the average density of sites downtown which is a very different question and also practically impossible to answer. It would still be a low number, I'd venture a somewhere below 3.0
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 9:08 AM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
Hmm... how much in population numbers did UBC Endowment Lands grow by?

And off-topic, but the province should really formalize the status of UBC Endowment Lands as a special municipality...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted May 4, 2012, 3:36 AM
smho smho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan_kuan View Post
Hmm... how much in population numbers did UBC Endowment Lands grow by?

And off-topic, but the province should really formalize the status of UBC Endowment Lands as a special municipality...
Census tract for UEL:
2011: 12,777
2006: 10,831
http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recen...ustom=&TABID=2
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted May 4, 2012, 3:43 AM
smho smho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 215
2011 census Vancouver city proper by neighbourhood:
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...easpop2011.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted May 4, 2012, 4:56 AM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,001
In 40 years, downtown grew from the neighbourhood with the lowest population to the highest, and mostly in just the last twenty years.

Shaughnessy actually decreased in population over the same time period.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted May 4, 2012, 3:41 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,380
Interesting to see how similar the populations are of Downtown and Renfrew-Collingwood. Furthermore, it's very interesting to see how the West End has only the third highest population, and not the first as is frequently boasted by residents. Granted, population and population density are not the same by a long shot.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted May 4, 2012, 4:03 PM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,001
It does seem that the West End still holds the title of being our most densely populated neighbourhood when you consider its size in comparison to Downtown and Renfrew-Collingwood. I wonder if cutting Downtown up into the smaller constituent neighbourhoods of Yaletown, Gastown, Coal Harbour, etc. would change that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted May 4, 2012, 5:20 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Collingwood had the highest density of any neighbourhood including the west end and downtown south. Pricetags touched on this not to long ago. I am suprised to see how well Renfrew-Collingwood is doing as a whole though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted May 4, 2012, 7:05 PM
Vestry Vestry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 48
At its densest census area, the West End is 28,000 per sq km. Collingwood hits 36,000.

Areas of southwest Vancouver are at 1,200 per sq km; less dense than areas of Surrey even.

Marinate on that for a minute.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted May 4, 2012, 10:09 PM
LotusLand LotusLand is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 612
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Collingwood had the highest density of any neighbourhood including the west end and downtown south. Pricetags touched on this not to long ago. I am suprised to see how well Renfrew-Collingwood is doing as a whole though.
The West End is by far still the most dense neighbourhood in the city. I got Collingwood at 5940.58 per sq km. Am I missing something?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted May 5, 2012, 1:24 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
You might be using the data for Renfrew-Collingwood and not just Collingwood on it's own.

Should be interesting with 3 additional towers going into the Collingwood section we could see them crack the 40K/sqkm before the next decade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 3:05 PM
LotusLand LotusLand is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 612
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
You might be using the data for Renfrew-Collingwood and not just Collingwood on it's own.

Should be interesting with 3 additional towers going into the Collingwood section we could see them crack the 40K/sqkm before the next decade.
I was. I looked more into and I can't find any data supporting that Collingwood is approaching such density levels. Any links? Is it just the few blocks that have towers?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 3:59 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
The following post refers to a single cenus tract which has it at over 39K/sqkm. Don't know the origin of the 36K number.

http://pricetags.wordpress.com/2012/...-a-new-winner/
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:06 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.