HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2012, 4:56 AM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pistola916 View Post
But the NBA does have the power to force them and the Kings to stay. I think its best to let the Kings go and make Stern promise us an expansion team in 2015-16 when we get the arena built.
If the Kings go, don’t think the city will just pick-up an expansion team to fill
the void. … that would be an additional cost of $100 to $300 million someone
would have to pay to the NBA and its owners.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TWAK View Post
Demanding a new arena for how long? Then when it's real crunch-time they suggest renovating Arco and don't want to pay pre-development fees...... Even if you are pro/anti new arena, everybody can see the Maloofs are real jackasses
Why as a renter of a new building (Maloof’s) would they also pay for the
pre-development costs? Those costs are traditionally picked up by the
owners which in this case would be the city. This is not for tenant
improvements to an existing structure, this is to build a new structure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:01 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.