HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > General Discussion


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2010, 10:29 PM
mrjauk mrjauk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
I guess it depends on your plans in life. Getting married, etc. For one person you may not want to buy, for two, it could make more sense for you.
I really think that you don't understand what Warren12 is saying. It doesn't matter if you fit one or two or twelve people into a home. That doesn't change the rent versus buy calculation. The real estate industrial complex has done a great job of making people believe that home ownership is the sine qua non criterion of housing bliss. It can be; it can also be financial albatross around your neck, as many millions in the US, Great Briatin, Spain, Ireland, etc., have recently found out and more thousands (tens of thousands, perhaps) in Vancouver will find out as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2010, 11:31 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 22,283
A friend who's house-hunting sent me this listing to prove you could still buy a place West of Main for under $600k. I didn't know whether to laugh or cry :
http://www.pauleviston.com/ActiveLis...ls/746/details
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2010, 12:10 AM
nickinacan's Avatar
nickinacan nickinacan is offline
Traveller Extraodinaire
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 355
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrjauk View Post
I really think that you don't understand what Warren12 is saying. It doesn't matter if you fit one or two or twelve people into a home. That doesn't change the rent versus buy calculation. The real estate industrial complex has done a great job of making people believe that home ownership is the sine qua non criterion of housing bliss. It can be; it can also be financial albatross around your neck, as many millions in the US, Great Briatin, Spain, Ireland, etc., have recently found out and more thousands (tens of thousands, perhaps) in Vancouver will find out as well.
Well put. Just wait for the Bank of Canada to put up their interest rates and the real estate market will be a bargain again. Too many people out there have mortgages that are high dollar value and low interest. As soon as that interest rate creeps up, their payments will rise dramatically. And if you barely qualified for your mortgage to begin with (As many have) you will most certainly be in trouble. I would rather have a low dollar mortgage with a high interest rate than a high dollar value mortgage and a low interest rate. And don't even get me started at those fools that didn't put down a downpayment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2010, 12:15 AM
mezzanine's Avatar
mezzanine mezzanine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext
A new study ranks Vancouver as the "most unaffordable housing market in the world":

The Centre's Wendell Cox says Vancouver gets a 9.3 on the index, a figure suggesting the average house sells for more than nine times the average annual salary. "The numbers are very clear on it. Vancouver is exceedingly expensive."
Wendell Cox runs Demographia, a right-wing think tank that is a staunch opponent of smart growth and transit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendell_Cox

His solution?

Quote:
The report includes an introduction by Tony Recsei, president of the Australian group, Save Our Suburbs, and calls on governments to allow more housing to be built on the fringes of urban areas.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-col...rdability.html

I'm not losing sleep. Read critically, people....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2010, 12:27 AM
nickinacan's Avatar
nickinacan nickinacan is offline
Traveller Extraodinaire
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 355
Quote:
Originally Posted by mezzanine View Post
Wendell Cox runs Demographia, a right-wing think tank that is a staunch opponent of smart growth and transit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendell_Cox

His solution?



http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-col...rdability.html

I'm not losing sleep. Read critically, people....
Statistics can be manipulated to say anything you want, but his facts are true. But does that mean We will be saying "f*** it" and build more houses on top of our farmland? Not at all. It just means we have to look at how to make housing more affordable to the people that live here. You will never get rid of the suburban life, but why not just reinvent it? Why not build higher instead of wider? Why not have narrower, taller houses? You can easily fit these giant homes they are building on smaller lots if you could just add another floor on top. Maybe our cities should be making adjustments to their residential FARs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2010, 2:41 AM
racc racc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickinacan View Post
Statistics can be manipulated to say anything you want, but his facts are true. But does that mean We will be saying "f*** it" and build more houses on top of our farmland? Not at all. It just means we have to look at how to make housing more affordable to the people that live here. You will never get rid of the suburban life, but why not just reinvent it? Why not build higher instead of wider? Why not have narrower, taller houses? You can easily fit these giant homes they are building on smaller lots if you could just add another floor on top. Maybe our cities should be making adjustments to their residential FARs.
The "study" is seriously flawed. If you look at their report on their web site, http://www.demographia.com/dhi.pdf , Detroit and other rust belt cities where the economy has collapsed, came out on top in terms of affordably. It is pretty clear that the reason why these cities are affordable is because everyone no wants to live there thus people are leaving leaving in droves and yet the study tries to say it is because they allow sprawl. Ridiculous.

There is also a story on CBC http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/201...rdability.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 11:42 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,153
i just met someone who moved here from Seoul Korea and they wanted to buy but are renting as they find it far too expensive here to buy and they seem to have money
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2010, 6:51 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 22,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by quobobo View Post
^^ Yep, always those foreigners.

(if I could roll my eyes at you through the internet, I would)
Where are all the eye-rollers now?

Scarrow added that once Metro Vancouver's market thawed in the spring of 2009, "mainland Chinese buyers started getting on board as well."

Scarrow said foreign buyers are coming into Metro Vancouver from Australia, Europe and the United States, but they are being overshadowed by mainland Chinese purchasers who view Canada as a good country to provide a western education for their children and Canadian real estate as a safe storehouse for their wealth.

http://www.vancouversun.com/business...076/story.html

So Junior gets a university crash pad, and we all get to contend with housing price inflation that ensues.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2010, 7:32 AM
vansky vansky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
mainland china has tons of money to spend in vancouver
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > General Discussion
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:47 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.