Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigaven
Oh please, I'm sorry but I have to disagree. There was nothing over-the-top about the criticism the building received on this forum. Just because we were chatting with one of the architects didn't mean we had to play nice. Architects are used to this kind of criticism, but I believe that Blume's (or whoever it was) handling of it was what was a disappointing moment.
|
I'm with you. Why can't we truthfully opine here? I don't expect anyone here to self censor their architectural thoughts. We aren't tweens bullying each other on Facebook (or maybe we are?) Through the critiques, I've learned SO much more about design/construction/form/materials/glass/history/compatibility than I have from glowing praise. Austin is weak compared to many other cities, in my view, because we don't have the REAL money of other cities. That will change in time, but it might not happen in my lifetime.
I'm not okay with always saying nice things to make people feel good. Not okay with being a dick either, but I don't recall anyone crossing that line in this case.
No one wants to chase people away. If that was Gensler, they did a good job getting their point across, albeit a little dramatically, and I think we all saw another point of view. That being said, they don't owe us anything....and can be as dramatic as they wish. Talented artists tend to have a flair for drama, that's ok with me.
I've had to make decisions I was not proud of in designing/building my own home due to money, but even more due to city or lot/tree constraints. It's hard, for sure.
All that said, If this is the final iteration of the Independent crown......so far.....I'm disappointed. Very happy to have this building, and I defend it all the time to anyone who will listen, I just hoped for more......drama!