[Surrey] Holland Park | 49m, 65m, 117m, 135m | 11, 19, 36, 42fls | U/C - Page 4

joeblowurho · #61 Posted **Oct 11, 2008, 11:17 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by jhausner

Does anyone know the architect for the project? I am trying to build the design of the buildings in Sketchup for my Downtown Surrey thinger and the photo from the Leader is a tad too small to be somewhat accurate. It would help to have a few shots of the conceptual design and usually the architects boast about their projects.

The Surrey site doesn't list the arch for this project though for some reason. Hrmm.

It's Patrick Cotter Architects.

GMasterAres · #62 Posted **Oct 15, 2008, 4:50 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeblowurho

It's Patrick Cotter Architects.

Thanks. That's the same Architect for the Urban Village Ultra project. They don't have anything posted yet unfortunately so I shall just wait patiently.

jlousa · #63 Posted **Nov 24, 2008, 9:18 PM**

Phase 1+2 and 3 which I can only imagine is the whole project have been delayed with a further update in April/09. That doesn't mean they are cancelled, but don't expect any movement for a while.

LeftCoaster · #64 Posted **Apr 9, 2009, 8:23 PM**

Well it's April and I have some news!

This project certainly hasn't been canceled, it is still in the works but there is no date associated with its construction.

Now on to the really good news...

The design has been significantly changed, resulting in a 31 storey 91m building, a 35 storey 106.5m building and a 160.5m 50 storey building.

Some Renderings:

vansky · #65 Posted **Apr 9, 2009, 8:50 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeftCoaster

Well it's April and I have some news!

This project certainly hasn't been canceled, it is still in the works but there is no date associated with its construction.

Now on to the really good news...

The design has been significantly changed, resulting in a 31 storey building, a 35 storey building and a 160.5m 50 storey building.

I'll post the renderings when I can.

160 sounds ok, i thought once there was something like a 250m planned for surrey. Surrey really has a better potential in height than richmond or even burnaby, crazy.

Metro-One · #66 Posted **Apr 9, 2009, 8:55 PM**

Wow! I really hope this one breaks ground in the near future. Is this the most concrete proposal of a skyscraper (150m+) Surrey has so far?

LeftCoaster · #67 Posted **Apr 9, 2009, 8:58 PM**

^^Yes

Just checked out the website and they have some additional renders that I don't have.

http://www.cotterarchitects.com/

The two smaller towers are under Holland Pointe and the signature tower is under Park Place

Lead · #68 Posted **Apr 9, 2009, 8:59 PM**

Nice. I'd like to see this, the Berezan towers, and Central City II added to that Sketchup model of downtown Surrey someone was working on.

osirisboy · #69 Posted **Apr 9, 2009, 9:00 PM**

nice!! thanks for the update

metroXpress · #70 Posted **Apr 10, 2009, 12:28 AM**

Thanks for the update....good to see things back on track again.

Whalleyboy · #71 Posted **Apr 10, 2009, 1:52 AM**

that is freakin awesome

CoryHolmes · #72 Posted **Apr 10, 2009, 2:07 AM**

This is just so sweet. I guess people are feeling the urge to match up to Berazen's proposal in a game of one-uppmanship. I fail to see the problem with this

Whalleyboy · #73 Posted **Apr 10, 2009, 2:41 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lead

Nice. I'd like to see this, the Berezan towers, and Central City II added to that Sketchup model of downtown Surrey someone was working on.

I have been thinking the same thing

Stingray2004 · #74 Posted **Apr 10, 2009, 2:50 AM**

Quote:

a 160.5m 50 storey building.

Awesome!

And the best part of it all, Surrey doesn't have those so-called, socially-engineered "view cones".

The sky's the limit!

Whalleyboy · #75 Posted **Apr 10, 2009, 2:53 AM**

I've remember reading some where surrey want to look into view cones down the line
cause view cones despite be annoying can make the city a lot better to look at
also they probably wouldnt be as bad as Vancouver's

giallo · #76 Posted **Apr 10, 2009, 3:06 AM**

Nice proposal.
Thanks for the update, LC.

Whalleyboy · #77 Posted **Apr 10, 2009, 7:54 PM**

i think this one looks way better then the orginal plan
well the 51 story one
the other 2 are looking a little plain

vansky · #78 Posted **Apr 10, 2009, 8:41 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whalleyboy

i think this one looks way better then the orginal plan
well the 51 story one
the other 2 are looking a little plain

finally something looking more powerful, we have to admit that height shows power.

metroXpress · #79 Posted **Apr 10, 2009, 9:00 PM**

Can't wait to see the tower being built....At this rate, I am still not sure if we will achieve the 2075 Plan?

officedweller · #80 Posted **Apr 11, 2009, 8:09 PM**

A bit slab-ish, but thanks for the info.