Quote:
Originally Posted by UpstateAce
I think it's important for outsiders to know how similar they are. I find many people that are blown away by how underrated Philadelphia is, when it really shouldn't be at all. It's one of the finest cities on the continent like you said.
I do agree with that poster that suggested Boston's PR team just does a better job of marketing than Philadelphia's. It's also moreso in Boston's DNA to boast itself, while Philadelphia does not.
|
It's absolutely underrated from the West Coast's perspective. I know people that have been to the big 4 cities on the East Coast (NYC, Boston, DC, Philadelphia) and Philadelphia is routinely ranked last. Either people don't have any desire to visit or they just liked the other cities more. It's not as quaint as Boston. It doesn't have the free museums and national monuments of DC. And people would rather visit NYC multiple times than go to Philadelphia once. Society Hill gets blank looks here, but everyone knows of Beacon Hill. It's like Philadelphia is more of the same as the other East Coast cities... but less, if that makes sense. If it really is similar like you said, what makes it unique? If you were to sell Philadelphia, what would you say? Fortunately, us West Coasters are always looking for the newest thing to Instagram, so maybe Philadelphia will be an up and coming travel destination once people get tired of the usual spots.
Also, my mistake about the Garden. I thought the original still existed. That being said, from a sports fan perspective, Boston is more of a basketball and baseball mecca than Philadelphia. If I go to Boston, I'm checking out Fenway. Same with NYC and Yankee Stadium and Chicago and Wrigley. Not saying I'd travel there just for the stadiums, but they would definitely make it on my itinerary. If I go to Philadelphia, I'm probably not adding Citizens Bank Park to my itinerary.