Quote:
Originally Posted by STR
If you're going to get butthurt over someone having an opinion different from yours, you could at least try to couch it in a rationale. You can't, because there really isn't an argument that the thing isn't a monument to Calatrava's ego. It in no way relates to its surroundings. It is a semi-brutalist stegosaurus dropped from heaven into a collection of geometric glass buildings. It's why some people think Tower 3 is over textured, as Rogers tried vainly to bridge the stegosaurus with the other buildings.
On top of that, it's had to be redesigned twice for being ridiculously expensive. It won't even be that big, the official renders are extremely misleading on the interior size. It's rather indefensible all around.
|
No, you're the one with the hurt butt whenever ANYONE disagrees with your opinions because you think you're right. Architecture is a matter of OPINION. To sit there and defend your opinion and then call other people's INDEFENSIBLE as if it's some kind of FACT, is wrong.
I'm sorry for the off-topic argument, but someone needs to take note of your interaction with other forumers and their opinions because it's really getting out of hand. I'm so sick of reading your patronizing responses to differing opinions that drip in self-righteousness, and your latest post is a blatant example of what I'm talking about.