While I like the overall architectural look of the project I don't agree with how it is being utilized on the property, or in other words its functionality as a project.
Yes Station Park is located near a FrontRunner Stop, but as I look at the layout, as has been proposed, this is in no way, shape or form a transit oriented development, it is a transit adjacent development. I look at it as a shared use parking lot, which in and of itself isn't a bad thing, but it is NOT TOD. It is a parking lot that serves two uses, a park and ride for FrontRunner and a parking lot for a suburban lifestyle shopping center, a shopping center much like the district.
Maybe the future plans call for residential and some additional office located between the shopping and the rail station, but this is not a destination that I would hop on FrontRunner to go do shopping at. I don't want to walk across several hundred yards of asphalt, parked cars and moving cars to go shopping just to do the same thing to get back. If the layout is the same or similar to the original proposal it is not a TOD.
http://www.coldwellbankercommercial..../1/36301_1.pdf
In my opinion a much better way to make this a true Transit Oriented Development is not to change the layout of the development, but simply to change the orientation of the development in relation to the FrontRunner stop.
You could keep the "power center" (big boxes) still on the south east end of the development and even along Clark Lane, but I would place the axis of the lifestyle center, "a line coming directly out of the cinema and through the center of the project" directly facing the FrontRunner station with no street between them. I would provide FrontRunner parking on both the north and south sides of the lifestyle center. This alignment would provide a much more realistic approach to FrontRunner riders coming into the center rather than simply going to their cars, and going home. I would also include in the initial phase that a portion of the upper floors be residential in nature, and phase two would include some additional residential and office immediately adjacent to the project and possibly some larger office structures spread throughout the overall development.
I will work up an example of what I mean and post it soon.