HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2018, 2:30 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags_in_the_peg View Post
small minority always have the loudest voice in issues like this. we should form a lobby group and help push projects like this and so many others that get stalled by a minority voice.
Well that's not as crazy an idea as you may think
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2018, 5:44 PM
headhorse headhorse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,743
^ it's the question of whether private property rights should take precedent over the public good/interest (I mean, ideally. not necessarily saving all development is a net postitive). part of it is zoning but there are larger conversations that need to happen
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2018, 7:57 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 2,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
I just don't understand his argument. He admitted the city told him that he could use the land until they want it back. Now they want it back. Why does he feel entitled to be paid for land he doesn't own?
That's not what he said. He said the deal was the city told him he could use the land until they expropriated his property to expand the park. Now the city sold the land, but didn't expropriate him so his argument is he still has rights to use that land.

It sounds like he's more than willing to be bought out for the right price.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2018, 8:37 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,742
What deal though? Show me the paper the City signed. If he has it, then fine. If not, piss off.

This sounds like my neighbor who uses the 2' sliver of land behind my garage. They have gardens and such in there. I told them once that I may want to put the fence back along the property line and use that space as storage. They seriously though it was their property. Piss, right, off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2018, 2:19 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheswick View Post
That's not what he said. He said the deal was the city told him he could use the land until they expropriated his property to expand the park. Now the city sold the land, but didn't expropriate him so his argument is he still has rights to use that land.

It sounds like he's more than willing to be bought out for the right price.
Doubt they ever said "we'll buy our own land back from you" – they said they'd take it back when they needed it. That time is now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:02 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.