HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Business, the Economy & Politics


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2007, 1:23 PM
asher519's Avatar
asher519 asher519 is offline
Criss Crosser of Country
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago (via all sorts of other places...)
Posts: 144
Office condo developments make their way to suburbs
National trend has been slow to catch on in Portland-area
Portland Business Journal - March 23, 2007
by Wendy Culverwell, Business Journal staff writer

Developers are betting that suburban business owners will see the merit of owning their offices instead of leasing them.

Commercial condominiums have gained a following in many markets, but not Portland, where few units have moved in the two or so years since they were first presented in downtown.

Two veteran developers -- one local and one from California -- are heading to the suburbs in search of established, small to midsize firms interested in owning their own offices. Separately, the two have plans to construct condominium-style business complexes in Beaverton, Hillsboro and West Linn.

Edge Development, traditionally a luxury home builder in Portland, is building Millikan Pointe, a 12-building project that will offer fee-simple ownership of office buildings of about 2,500 square feet apiece. Edge breaks ground next week at the site, a 9-acre wedge bordered by Southwest Murray Boulevard and Millikan Way.

The project will be a hybrid between individual ownership and condominium. Buyers will own their buildings and land, but share possession of the common parking lot and landscaping.

The other developer is a newcomer to Oregon. Venture Corp., based in Larkspur, Calif., breaks ground next week in West Linn's Willamette district, where it is replacing the former Thriftway complex with 35,000 square feet of retail and 35,000 square feet of office.

The offices will be available for sale in units of around 1,000 square feet, said Todd Berryhill, vice president for development.

The company expects to sell office space to dentists and physicians who lease clinics in the area, said Berryhill, who is a University of Oregon graduate.

Venture has nearly three dozen commercial condominium projects under construction in five Western states, including two in Oregon. The other will be built in Hillsboro on a site in the Tanasbourne area. The company will submit applications to the city next week and break ground as soon as it receives permits, Berryhill said.

The first phase will consist of 75,000 square feet, with office space being sold in 1,000- to 2,000-square-foot units. With offices priced at $275 a square foot, the project is being cast as a reasonable alternative to leasing.

Berryhill, along with Edge Development's Scott Elliott, believe Portland is ready for suburban office condominiums, though both shy away from using the word "condominium" because it sounds too residential.

Elliott and his partner, Grove Hunt, are betting that established small to midsize businesses -- doctors, insurance agents, the odd industry association -- will like the location and the opportunity to convert rent payments into assets.

"People paying rent for years are ready to buy," he said.

Elliott said Edge is targeting smaller businesses for the obvious reason that "the economic makeup of Portland is small to medium business."

Venture has a longer track record with commercial condominiums.

Interestingly enough, it began building for-sale office parks in Silicon Valley shortly after the tech bust, which left it holding the largest business complex in the area. No one wanted to lease space, but the company got plenty of calls from small business owners asking if it could build a 2,000-square-foot building.

The answer was initially no, until Venture decided to build large buildings, broken into small for-sale units, complete with fire walls and individual entrances.

It built its first commercial condominium in Silicon Valley in a market with 70 million square feet of empty office space. Its bankers laughed.

"It wasn't the first lender who lent us money," Berryhill said, dryly.

The project got built. It sold out, and Venture retooled its business to concentrate on similar projects.

The key, according to Berryhill, is to strike a balance between the need to build large structures against buyer demand for individualized entrances. To do that, Venture depends on creative architects who add custom details to each office front -- one entrance may be set back while the neighboring door is set forward.

Of course, the real challenge is to find buyers.

Portland has flirted with commercial condominiums for at least two years. Despite strong interest -- and low interest rates -- few if any commercial condominiums have sold in downtown for a multitude of reasons, including price and concern among would-be buyers that they might outgrow the space.

To market the Beaverton property, Edge Development has enlisted Greg Burpee, a broker with Macadam Forbes, a real estate services firm. The project includes some retail space, which will be leased by New and Neville Real Estate Services.

Venture has signed up with Grubb and Ellis Inc., and has plans to pound the pavement.

Berryhill will go after chamber of commerce members. The marketing tool kit includes construction site dinners and a straightforward appeal to the bottom line: 10 years from now, do you want to have paid $1 million in rent, or own a $1 million asset?

"Any small-businessman who understands a financial spreadsheet understands it makes sense to own the office in the long run," Berryhill said.

wculverwell@bizjournals.com | 503-219-3415
__________________
"It's unfair to have cities where parking is free for cars and housing is expensive for people." -- Donald Shoup
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted May 4, 2007, 3:13 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,518
Portland office outlook: mixed and confused
Portland Business Journal - May 4, 2007
by Wendy Culverwell

Making sense of Portland's office market performance in the first part of 2007 wasn't a task for the faint of heart.

While rents rose, more office space came on the market than was leased, or absorbed. It was the first quarter of negative absorption in recent years and could be a potentially chilling sign of things to come.

On the other hand, more than 4 million square feet of office space changed owners, and developers indicated they're preparing to construct new office buildings.

Kruse Way, the submarket darling of the local economy, posted its first significant losses in recent memory. One culprit is the slowing residential real estate market and the crisis in the subprime lending area, which together have caused several financial services firms to give up space.

According to Colliers International, the vacancy rate for the submarket including Kruse Way rose seven-tenths of a point to 13 percent, with more than 928,000 square feet available for either direct lease or sublease.

A new landlord in town, however, isn't pouting over one quarter's worth of Kruse Way data.

Shorenstein Properties acquired the former Portland assets of Equity Office Properties Trust from Blackstone Group in a deal finalized last month.

Shorenstein officials say they remain bullish on Portland and plan to construct one or even two office buildings on the last two buildable properties the company owns on Kruse Way -- Kruse Oaks III and IV.

Still, the overall office market picture was unquestionably gray in the first three months of the year.

No matter who crunches the numbers, Portland entered negative absorption territory in the first quarter. Seattle also saw more office space become vacant, though at much lower levels than Portland.

Locally, the slowdown is alternately blamed on cautious business owners and on the two-part Equity-Blackstone-Shorenstein sale, which triggered a quiet period when leases were reportedly difficult to execute.

Whatever the reason, it was the first time more office space went dark than light since before 2004.

Gordon King, senior vice president at Colliers International in Portland, attributes the slowdown to the national economy and weaker job growth in Oregon. After several years of 3 percent annual job creation, the state has revised its expectations to below 1.5 percent.

King said businesses are answering by adopting a conservative stance when it comes to office space -- choosing less expensive space or even subletting out parts of their offices.

"Markets do respond to high and low rental rates," he said.

Brad Christiansen, associate vice president at Colliers, said decision-makers are adopting a wait-and-see attitude. He's working with a number of clients looking to reduce rent expenses, including one in downtown that plans to leave $25-a-square-foot Class A space for Class B offices priced at $18 a square foot.

Grubb & Ellis, which confirmed the negative absorption figures, characterizes the first quarter as a "breather."

"We had a little blip," said Dave Squire, managing director for Grubb & Ellis.

But for every anecdote about a business moving from Class A to Class B space, Scott Madsen, a principal with the boutique firm Capacity Commercial Group, said there are more firms making the opposite move. The first quarter is always slow, he added.

The real story, brokers agreed, is the lack of any new buildings set to open in the immediate future. Shorenstein intends to build at Southwest First Avenue and Main Street in downtown and TMT Development plans to build at the Zell Block, so named because of its resident Zell Bros. store on Southwest Morrison Street and Park Avenue. No project has broken ground.

wculverwell@bizjournals.com | 503-219-3415
http://portland.bizjournals.com/port...ml?t=printable
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted May 4, 2007, 7:14 PM
BrG BrG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 342
Quote:
Originally Posted by tworivers View Post
Cool rendering. I hope the bridge remains in the plans if this building goes up.


Wow.. haven't seen this in awhile. A bit of history. (Sorry to post this so late in this threads life, but anyway...)

The bridge was separate peice of the project, intended to be constructed at a different time. It was actually designed affter the building was. keep in mind the client would be multiheaded (City/Union Pacific/ Winkler/ Naito/ PDC) and getttign it biult would require considerable cooperation.

OWP could see significant revisions if it ever comes to pass. It was designed at the top of the tech boom, replete with selling points like raised floors and a host of other LEED goodies. Double skins were looked at, but it was too expensive (1-2 million extra, just for partial facades), so the 6 glass-type mosaic pattern inset into 8 inch deep mullions, was considered as a cheaper design alternative.

It also had expansive northerly and westerly views and was the tallest thing around the river district at the time. Now, with all the delay, eveything else has come up around it and, the views are not as great. It was also trying to hit a marketplace that could withstand A+ office rents. It was expensive to construct in those times, and costs for construction have done nothing but go sky high, in the 7 years since I was a part of designing it. Since then, many things have changed, but what really killed it then, was the events of 2K1. The dot-bomb, and 9/11.

Lastly, the parking:

Jim's plan was to try to offer a suburban office parking ratio, to offset the fact that it was a little bit marooned from the Pearl at the time. The train really cuts off that area, and it's not particularly pedestrian freindly althoough much has been done to remedy that in the 7 years since the project was conceived. So, anyway the 700 car garage was designed as a selling point to potential tenants, in addition to help offset the lost parkign at Albers Mill when the Willammette Greenway was to be expanded into the parking lot across the street, along the river.

A difficult design, to located it under the bridge. He also wanted it to be as green as humanly possible. Lots of trellises, and so on.

I'm speculating from the outside of it's process now, but I would expect Winkler and Naito to re-think the project before proceeding.

Also the lead designer of OWP no longer works for Boora. Nor do most of the project team. One person stil ldoe, I think and she's great. She could likely get it done wit hone hand behind her back, but she's likely long since moved on to other things.

I'd love nothing more for the project to get built as designed. It still will be really nice... if so.

But, I am not holding my breath.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted May 4, 2007, 8:04 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,518
^thanks for the update on that. Disappointing, but interesting.

Is the partnership for this project with the same side of the Naito family that is working with Beam on the OTCT several block redevelopment? Their priorities might have shifted too.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted May 4, 2007, 8:49 PM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,598
The first thing I thought this morning when I read the article Mark posted was, "crap, now there's even less of a chance One Waterfront Place will get built". It's frustrating to see another beautifully designed building not get built here, and I hate to think of the box at 1st and Main gobbling up more of the office market.

Many thanks for the inside story, BrG.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted May 4, 2007, 10:41 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by tworivers
The first thing I thought this morning when I read the article Mark posted was, "crap, now there's even less of a chance One Waterfront Place will get built".
The thing I found interesting about the article I posted this morning was that it didn't mention the CBD. It talked about a slowing down of growth in the sub-market, and Kruse Way. There was also a mention about a company moving from class A space to class B, but it didn't give downtown vacancy rates.

Another interesting point. From my understanding class B space is the harder space to rent downtown and usually shows a higher vacancy, while class A space is in high demand and is usually statistically full. I wonder why the story didn't give even a little hint of downtown vacancy? Anyone have those numbers?
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted May 4, 2007, 11:18 PM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,976
its interesting that the website is still up: http://www.onewaterfrontplace.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted May 5, 2007, 3:49 AM
pdxman's Avatar
pdxman pdxman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,037
When's the last time a big company moved here or started up here and boomed? It feels like its been a while...It seems like the job market in oregon is starting to weaken(not that it was ever that strong).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted May 7, 2007, 8:20 AM
BrG BrG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 342
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
^thanks for the update on that. Disappointing, but interesting.

Is the partnership for this project with the same side of the Naito family that is working with Beam on the OTCT several block redevelopment? Their priorities might have shifted too.

Sure. Happy to.

Man there are a LOT of sausage fingered mispellings in that post of mine.

RE: Naito.... Pretty sure, Yes. Bob/ Lisa, not Sam/Verne, IIRC.

IF the right tenant came along and signed up for OWP as /is, I see no reason why they couldn't be a part of both at once (Chinatown and OWP). Who knows the ownership makeup of OWP now, though. The site sign is still there, last time I drove by. I guess it would be easy to tell, by seeing if NBS is still trying to lasso a tenant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2007, 6:30 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,518
Class B makes its return
Commercial tenants that flew to quality now 'fly to economics'
Portland Business Journal - August 31, 2007
by Wendy Culverwell
Business Journal staff writer

Just two years ago, recruiting tenants to Montgomery Park was a challenge. The massive building in Northwest Portland is at the edge of downtown and was about 30 percent empty. Tenants were enticed to nicer space in Class A buildings by stagnating rents.

Today, the 750,000-square foot office complex in Northwest Portland is essentially full with a 98 percent occupancy rate. Brokers say they regularly field inquiries from prospective tenants but have to turn them away.

The tide has changed not just for Montgomery Park but for most of its Class B brethren.

With little space available in the Class A market and rents rising, tenants that just a few years ago sought out A spaces are increasingly turning to Class B.

"With Class As pushing their rates and the decrease in availability, it's a good time to be the owner of Class B buildings," said CB Richard Ellis broker Trevor Kafoury, who represents both Montgomery Park and Albers Mill, on Northwest Naito Parkway.

Montgomery Park has been full for almost a year and Albers Mill has just one space, about 5,000 square feet, left for rent. Both buildings are owned by Bill Naito Co.

Loosely defined, Class B offices are older, well-maintained buildings with smaller floors, lower rents and fewer amenities than the newest buildings. If Fox Tower is king of Portland's Class As, then Montgomery Park, both because of and despite its massive floors, is king of the Bs.

Class B has dominated leasing activity since the start of the year, according to research by Colliers International and generally confirmed by rivals Grubb & Ellis and NAI Norris Beggs & Simpson.

For the first six months of the year, the Portland office market absorbed more than 726,000 square feet of Class B office space, the vast majority of it in the second quarter alone. In the same period, the Class A needle scarcely moved, with fewer than 15,000 square feet coming off the market.

Class B continues to have the highest vacancy rates in the market, at 12.4 percent, but it also posted the greatest rent increases, about 8.6 percent.

It's a stark change.

As recently as two years ago, rent in Class A buildings was stagnant and even tenants on limited budgets could afford first-class digs. The moving-up phenomenon even had its own term: flight to quality.

It was easy to see why. Six years ago, some Class B offices were leasing for $20 or even $21 a square foot, comparable to asking rents for Class A space.

But now the Class A spaces are nearly full and large tenants have few choices when it comes to finding a full floor or even two adjacent floors in a single building. Rents may climb as much as 8 percent this year.

Today, Class A offices that previously rented in the low $20s now command rents in the high $20s, if not more.

For tenants who signed leases four or five years ago, that means the rent bill will climb significantly if they renew and stay put, explained Eric Haskins, an office broker and vice president with Grubb & Ellis. For many, that's not an option.

"They're faced with a flight to economics," he said.

This year, he said, he hasn't seen any one signature Class B deals, just a bunch of 5,000- to 20,000-square-foot deals. But last year, he helped a client, Web MD, move customer support operations to Montgomery Park, from the Old Town/Chinatown neighborhood.

The growing business was up against the limits of most Class B buildings, he explained. In Old Town/Chinatown, they were spread across several floors.

The company wanted the efficiency that comes with consolidating in a single space and looked across several classes before settling on Montgomery Park.

But that's unusual.

Most B buildings have floors of 10,000 square feet or smaller. For a growing office with concerns about being spread out on several floors or even several buildings, Class B can pose a challenge.

Then too, so can Class A.

"There aren't too many good places to choose from," Haskins said. "That forces people to look at both A and B."

Mark Fraser, senior vice president with GVA Kidder Mathews, has seen B buildings fill up. The Mohawk Building, at Southwest Third and Morrison, is a perfect example; Interface Engineering recently signed a 28,000 lease to stay in place and expand. The company liked the building and the way it's managed. More telling, when Fletcher Farr Ayotte Architecture moved out of the Mohawk Building, its old space didn't stay empty long. Two prospective tenants competed for the space.

Fraser said the Class B trend is especially noticeable with local firms.

"If you are a national or international company and you're comparing rent to Seattle, Los Angeles, San Francisco or New York, it's not a big deal to pay Class A. But if you're a local company and you're spending your own money, that rent differential is big," he said.

The strength of the market is prompting building owners to invest in updating older buildings as well.

For example, Haskins represents the office space at 620 S.W. Fifth Ave., which is above the downtown Ross Dress for Less store. The current owner paid $11.35 million for the building last fall. In addition to two floors of retail, it has 104,000 square feet of office space.

The owners plans to renovate the exterior facade in keeping with other neighborhood improvements, including the revamping of the nearby Macy's store, Haskins said.

"You improve the building today to enable yourself to get a higher rent category," Haskins said.

Kafoury, of CB Richard Ellis, agreed it's a good time for owners to consider reinvesting in older buildings.

"There's still competition in that Class B market in downtown. The owners who are investing money are going to be the first in line," he said.

wculverwell@bizjournals.com | 503-219-3415

http://portland.bizjournals.com/port...ml?t=printable
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2007, 2:56 AM
scleeb scleeb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Irvington/Grant Park - NE PDX
Posts: 113
Quote:
For example, Haskins represents the office space at 620 S.W. Fifth Ave., which is above the downtown Ross Dress for Less store. The current owner paid $11.35 million for the building last fall. In addition to two floors of retail, it has 104,000 square feet of office space.

The owners plans to renovate the exterior facade in keeping with other neighborhood improvements, including the revamping of the nearby Macy's store, Haskins said.
That's huge. The 620 Building is in dire need of a facade upgrade. I consider the ROSS Store the greatest eyesore in downtown Portland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2007, 3:37 AM
pdx2m2 pdx2m2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 166
actually waterfront place is moving ahead with winkler, naito, and boora.

the project team is looking at the original design and evaluting whether what changes make sense given a new building code, new LEED standards , new construction costs, technologies etc.

there will be a pedestrian bridge and some significant FAR bonus earnings including the potential for significant public art..which was part of the original design.

the project will end up more sustainable than it was moving from LEED gold to LEED platnium,....in the end i think the project will retain it's high performance and its beauty...

a pre application conference is coming up in september with design review several months out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2007, 3:48 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,598
^^^ You just made my day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2007, 9:16 PM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,477
I'm amazed that redevelopment is picking up, not slowing down. I feel fortunate...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2007, 6:13 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 1,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdx2m2 View Post
actually waterfront place is moving ahead with winkler, naito, and boora.

the project team is looking at the original design and evaluting whether what changes make sense given a new building code, new LEED standards , new construction costs, technologies etc.

there will be a pedestrian bridge and some significant FAR bonus earnings including the potential for significant public art..which was part of the original design.

the project will end up more sustainable than it was moving from LEED gold to LEED platnium,....in the end i think the project will retain it's high performance and its beauty...

a pre application conference is coming up in september with design review several months out.
__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2007, 11:26 PM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,976
is the parking garage still part of the plan?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2007, 1:26 AM
pdxman's Avatar
pdxman pdxman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,037
^^^Yes, at least it was still in the review/pre-app
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2007, 3:10 AM
pdx2m2 pdx2m2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 166
the project scope is very similar to the original one waterfront place...office building, 145' tall, 4 level parking garage between 500 and 700 cars, new pedestrian bridge to NW Marshall....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2007, 3:21 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,518
Portland architectural landmark sells to Unico for $28 million
The Belluschi-designed Commonwealth Building is home to a host of the city's design firms
POSTED: 06:00 AM PDT Thursday, October 4, 2007
BY ALISON RYAN
Daily Journal of Commerce

One of Portland’s architectural landmarks has been sold to Unico Properties for $27.7 million.

The Pietro Belluschi-designed Commonwealth Building since 1993 had been owned by Joe Weston, who purchased the building at auction for $1.9 million.

In July, Weston donated the building to his public charity, which supports the Oregon Community Foundation (OCF). At that time, OCF President Greg Challie said the foundation would hold onto the property, valued at $30 million, as an asset.

The board of directors of Weston’s foundation made the decision to sell, said Nancy A. Wilson, vice president for fund services of the OCF. Proceeds from the building sale and the foundation’s other assets will generate about $2.5 million in 2008.

Sale of the building to Seattle-based Unico Properties and its investment partner Cigna Realty Investors closed Friday. Unico manages Portland’s Lincoln Building and the U.S. Bancorp Tower. The company is also building a two-block project – which will include a 16-story apartment tower, offices and a Safeway store – between 12th and 14th avenues and Marshall and Lovejoy streets in the Pearl District.

The Commonwealth Building is only 30 percent leased. But having so much contiguous space to offer is a benefit, said Brian Pearce, Unico’s general manager for its Portland portfolio, as companies make finding more room a priority.

“What I’m finding is if you’re a tenant over 10,000 square feet, you’re looking at a wide spectrum of (building) types,” Pearce said. “If you’re a big tenant, you have to look at everything.”

The 15-story, 208,000-square foot Commonwealth Building occupies a half block on Southwest Sixth Avenue between Stark and Washington streets.

The building, originally known as the Equitable Building, was built for Equitable Savings and Loan in 1948 and has been on the National Register of Historic Places since 1976.

Renovations started by Weston’s American Property Management, including overhauls of the elevator lobbies on each floor, will continue under the new ownership with an immediate $6 million building renovation.

One of the first glass box towers ever built – and the first to use modern features like double-paned glass and aluminum cladding – the building is one of Portland’s most architecturally noted by designers. Architectural firms have taken note, with firms such as Sienna Architecture, Colab Architecture + Urban Design, and DLR Group occupying space in the historic building.

Colab is new to the building, said principal Mark Engberg, only inking its five-year lease in March. Tenants were notified of the potential sale about a week and a half ago, he said, and got notice on Monday that the sale had closed on Friday.

The decision to move from Southwest Fifth Avenue was made in part because Colab needed expansion room, Engberg said, and in part because of the great, light-filled space they snagged. But there was also, he said, the building’s reputation to consider.

“It’s certainly the most famous architectural building in Portland,” he said, “in architecture circles anyway.”
http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDeta...mmonwealth-Bui
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Business, the Economy & Politics
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:20 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.