HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


    Vancouver House in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Vancouver Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 2:28 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Vancouver House (1400 Howe St) | 151.5m | 52Fl | Completed

The wait is over, here is the project most of you have been waiting for.

Quote:
The City has received an application to rezone the sites at 1412-1460 Howe Street, 1429 and 1410 Granville Street, and 710 Pacific Street from BCPED (B.C. Place/Expo) and FCCDD (False Creek Comprehensive Development) Districts to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is for a mixed-use development as follows:

* on the Howe Street sites, a 49-storey residential tower with a 9-storey podium including market rental housing, commercial uses, and a childcare facility

* on the Granville Street and Pacific Street sites, 6-storey buildings providing retail (including a grocery store, drugstore and liquor store) and office uses a proposed floor space ratio (FSR) of 4.8 (i.e. the total building floor area permitted would be equal to 4.8 times the site area)

* a total floor area of 60 668 m² (653,046 sq. ft.)
- 39 464 m²(424,800.9 sq. ft.) strata residential
- 6 340 m² (68,245.4 sq. ft.) rental residential
- 6 300 m² (67,814.9 sq. ft.) retail
- 5 935 m² (63,885.9 sq. ft.) office space, and
- 650 m² (6,996.8 sq. ft.) childcare

* a maximum height of 150 m (the General Policy for Higher Buildings has identified this site as a location for a higher building);

* a total of 600 residential units including 180 market rental units; and
713 parking spaces, 8 loading bays, and 270 bike spaces.
Cover, Introduction, and Index
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin.../cover-toc.pdf

Rezoning Rationale Statement
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...zrationale.pdf

Uses and Sizes
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ments/uses.pdf

Urban Components, City Analysis
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...tyanalysis.pdf

Generation Diagrams
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ents/tower.pdf

Height Rationale
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...nts/height.pdf

Skyline Studies
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ts/skyline.pdf

Shadow Studies
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ts/shadows.pdf

Generation Diagram
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...nts/podium.pdf

Podium Design Evolution
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...diumdesign.pdf

Public Realm Under the Granville Bridge
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ublicrealm.pdf

Studies for Greener Large Sites, Urban Performance
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ts/greener.pdf

Sustainability,Architectural Performance
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ainability.pdf

LEED
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ments/leed.pdf

Landscape
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin.../landscape.pdf

Height Studies, Urban Views Impact Analysis
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ghtstudies.pdf

Structural Analysis
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...structural.pdf

Transportation Review
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...sportation.pdf

Project Data
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...rojectdata.pdf

Context Plan
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ontextplan.pdf

Site Plan
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...s/siteplan.pdf

Podium Plans
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...odiumplans.pdf

General Elevation Drawings
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ents/elevs.pdf

General Section Drawings
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...s/sections.pdf

Tower Plans
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...towerplans.pdf

Tower Section Drawings
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...ersections.pdf

Landscape Plans
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...scapeplans.pdf

Enjoy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 2:36 AM
ckkelley's Avatar
ckkelley ckkelley is offline
Bridge Walker!
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Forest City
Posts: 1,037
I would say putting tower design on its head!

Wild stuff. Not your typical Vancouver tower.

Thanks J-lo!
__________________
Just chimin' in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 3:48 AM
golog golog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 356
That building scares me a little bit, I'd love to see it built
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 4:26 AM
quobobo quobobo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,053
So, so great. Hoping this one gets built, thanks for the comprehensive post jlousa!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 4:33 AM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,015
I like how they are not content with the 425 feet under the revised guidline and are proposing 493 feet.

Last edited by Prometheus; Feb 10, 2012 at 6:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 5:12 AM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,001
The second page of Uses and Sizes has a nice render that gives a sense of just how wide the tower will be.

Another beautiful render at dusk on the first page of Urban Components.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 4:24 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
I love the design!

It's regrettable they have not been able to purchase the remaining lots on that block, although I suppose it could still happen.

Last edited by red-paladin; Feb 10, 2012 at 4:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 4:26 AM
squeezied's Avatar
squeezied squeezied is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,625
Wowza! Looking good!

You know it's going to be a luxury building by the number of 3bed units. This is probably one of the handful of buildings in this city (especially downtown) where 1beds make up less than half of the units. I'm estimating about a quarter of the units are 1beds. Quite refreshing but the flip side of that coin means low affordability. But I'm willing to sacrifice a bit of affordability for some architectural eye candy.

It's hard to tell, but the 2bed unit on the west side of the building (the one with 785sqft) on the 10th and 20th floor has a really tight entrance due to the structural concrete columns/walls. http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plannin...towerplans.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 6:44 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,147
i really like the underbridge uses
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 6:58 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,834
Geoff Meggs must hate this proposal! For it has towers being built directly beside a viaduct and ramps!

And look at what they are proposing under the structure itself! hmmmmmmm...

Love the idea of having a movie venue under the bridge as well, along with the night market and using good lighting features to make the space more welcoming.

Love the design of this tower, please city council, do not water it down!
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 7:34 AM
NetMapel's Avatar
NetMapel NetMapel is offline
Hello World
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,522
I really like the idea of having that outdoor theatre underneath the bridge. I hope they do it because it'll add more vibrancy to our downtown

Of all the movies they picked, they chose Twilight
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 7:49 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,534
Not only is it a wonderful design, it perfectly suits the site it's proposed on.

I'm with jlousa; let's do our best to let the UDP know that we're ready for this type of architecture in the city centre.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 9:41 AM
Echowinds Echowinds is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Richmond, B.C.
Posts: 136
Wow, this one has creative land uses and architecture in the same proposal. Really hopes the end product isn't going to be watered down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 1:37 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,164
I'm Blown Away!

This is incredible. If built to the fidelity of the renders, this one is going to be something special!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 4:56 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
Very exciting proposal and truly 'un-vancouver'. Love it
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 5:37 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,631
Fantastic, came out taller than I expected. I hope this one is allowed to get through UDP and permitting without being significantly altered.

I cannot say enough good things about this development so I wont even bother. I'll just say its damn near perfect.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 6:01 PM
ozonemania ozonemania is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 678
Like everyone else, I am so impressed and excited for this development. The tower is awesome obviously. But the street level plans are what blew me away. The people that put this proposal together think very much in the way I like. It's fresh but also real.

Furthermore, I hope this is a wake-up call for our incestuous local architectural firms, as good as they are, that they need to push their own boundaries. So many fresh ideas from around the world yet they stick to their tried and true palette.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 6:09 PM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,593
Seriously. Fucking. Cool.

As amazing as the tower is, I agree that it is the street level plans that really blew me away. The concepts for how the space can be so usable are unbelievable. Just shows what can be done working around obstacles such as bridges or viaducts (*hint *hint, Viaducts). The creativity is fantastic.
__________________
Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 6:47 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,100
I love it, but that waffle cone exterior's gonna be a bitchkitty to keep clean, and how green can that possibly be?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 6:59 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,675
Wow, didn't realize it would be the 3rd tallest in the city at 493 ft. In some of the context views it doesn't look that tall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:13 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.