HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #361  
Old Posted May 20, 2015, 1:49 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
The City is appealing the OMB decision on building heights in Centretown, requesting a judicial review from Ontario Divisional Court. The decision basically said that Official and Secondary Plans are not the right place for prescriptive standards - these should be in a zoning by-law instead. The City believes the decision could have major implications on its CDP and overall approach of its Official Plan. Most recently OPA 150 includes standard building height restrictions across the city, unless specific heights are defined through a secondary plan. The City's intention is to add more certainty to the planning process by including these height limits into its policy documents, which would make them harder to change.

The Ottawa Sun story has the City memo

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...5b91d2dabcb7ca
http://blogs.canoe.com/cityhall/plan...town-planning/

here is a link to the decision
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onomb/do...nlii24187.html

Gowlings' take: Official, but illegal: Are Official Plans being used in a manner that is a "bridge too far?"
https://www.gowlings.com/knowledgeCe...ut_illegal.pdf

Last edited by waterloowarrior; May 20, 2015 at 2:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #362  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2015, 1:36 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
City tried to dismiss some of the appeals but was not successful
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onomb/do...nlii35830.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #363  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2015, 1:21 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
City loses hearing relating to re-designating large chunk of prime ag lands to rural. Basically all the land on the north side of Barnsdale between the 416 and Prince of Wales. Just some farmers wanting more flexibility on severances and zoning, right?
https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onomb/d...nlii54845.html

The change to rural will make it easier to add these lands to the urban boundary in the future and get us one step closer to Barrhavenotick
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #364  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2016, 2:00 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
More updates from the OPA 150 case
http://www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions...eb-23-2016.pdf

Really getting in the weeds
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #365  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2017, 12:53 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #366  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2017, 9:26 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
OPA 180 approved - appeal period ends August 30, 2017
https://www.ebr.gov.on.ca/ERS-WEB-Ex...M0&language=en
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #367  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2018, 10:29 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Looks like the City will be looking at a new Official Plan for the next term of Council, rather than just an update. This will allow them to take advantage of many of the new rules for new Official Plans which restrict appeals and allow for a 10 year review cycle instead of 5 years.
http://app05.ottawa.ca/sirepub/agdoc...&itemid=376684
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #368  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2018, 1:52 PM
danishh danishh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
Looks like the City will be looking at a new Official Plan for the next term of Council, rather than just an update. This will allow them to take advantage of many of the new rules for new Official Plans which restrict appeals and allow for a 10 year review cycle instead of 5 years.
http://app05.ottawa.ca/sirepub/agdoc...&itemid=376684
It makes this election all the more important, as we'll be locking in the views of this council until the mid 2030s.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #369  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2018, 3:28 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Settlement of some OPA 150 appeals
http://app05.ottawa.ca/sirepub/agdoc...&itemid=376890
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #370  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2019, 12:25 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
OPA 150 settlement approved re Building Height, design, and intensification lands

http://www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions...an-25-2019.pdf

Lots more OPA 150/180 hearings to to go!
https://www.omb.gov.on.ca/ecs/CaseDe...spx?n=PL140495
https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onlpat/...nlii89405.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #371  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2019, 9:02 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Ottawa Next: Beyond 2036 staff report and OP workplan
http://app05.ottawa.ca/sirepub/mtgvi...doctype=AGENDA

Some OPA 180 settlements also on the agenda
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #372  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2019, 12:44 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,307
What if? New report paints scenarios for the future of Ottawa

Joanne Laucius, Ottawa Citizen
Updated: February 5, 2019


A report that casts ahead to Ottawa 50-plus years from now contains some eye-opening scenarios.

One scenario painted in Ottawa Next: Beyond 2036 suggests Ottawa-Gatineau will be part of a “mega-region” with Toronto and Montreal in order to compete in the global market for talent and investment, aided by high-speed trains to Montreal in an hour and to Toronto in two hours.

Another scenario comes right out of the plot of a near-future dystopian novel. The gap between rich and poor widens to the point where the rich live downtown in enclaves near a thriving entertainment district. Some have private security. Meanwhile, the poor live stuffed six to 10 in two- or three-bedroom apartments in neighbourhoods where substance abuse and crime are rife.

Yet another suggests that living indoors will be the new normal under climate change. While there are innovations in energy efficiency and green design, energy demand keeps increasing. Wastewater is filtered on-site in commercial, industrial and apartment buildings, and nuclear power is the main source of energy.

Some scenarios look on the bright side.

In one, governments invest in employment, social services and affordable housing. There are still income disparities, but they’re not growing. There are still a lot of green spaces, museums, and galleries, but Ottawa’s identity is increasingly based on its image as a “global city” with thriving ethnic communities downtown and in the suburbs. There are new international and regional festivals, restaurants and shops, which become key to attracting newcomers and businesses.

In December 2016, city councillors asked staff to undertake a planning study to identify trends and disrupters and identify opportunities beyond 2036. David Gordon, a professor in the School of Urban and Regional Planning at Queen’s University and a group of graduate students were enlisted to take city staff through process of planning scenarios. (In 2017, the school produced a report called Canada’s Resilient Capital: Ottawa in the Next Half Century)

A good scenario plan looks at an entire region, 50 to 60 years ahead, and considers factors such as risks, things that might change and choices that might be made, said Gordon. Scenarios help decision-makers and voters think about the steps they need to take to achieve — or avoid — that scenario.

“You step back and look honestly, like you’re seeing a photo from space,” said Gordon. “If you think it will be a region with two to three million people, do you want it to look like Atlanta or like Helsinki?”

If the scenarios are thought-provoking, that’s the point to the exercise, said Barrhaven Coun. Jan Harder, the chair of the city’s planning committee, which will be receiving the report on Feb. 14.

“It’s absolutely provocative. It takes you out of your sandbox.”

Among the scenarios:

• Mega region: Ottawa-Gatineau, Montreal and Toronto band together to attract high-tech workers and companies. Ottawa’s relatively low cost of living attracts an influx of people from Montreal and Toronto. Small businesses that can network within the mega-region grow and create international head offices in Ottawa. A high-speed rail link that stops at the airport allows Ottawa to expand its roster of flight destinations.

• Boomtown: Ottawa successfully woos a major new employer, which locates in downtown, bringing 100,000 jobs. Complementary companies also move in, creating 50,000 more jobs. The city invests in transit, parks and culture to attract international talent and there’s a new university or college to keep up with demand. While automation replaces some retail and manual jobs, retraining older workers is only partially successful, leaving seniors living in poverty.

• Government town: Ottawa trundles on with the federal government as its anchor employer. High-tech companies struggle to commercialize research and development, but health and biotech increase in importance. Tourism is strong and Ottawa takes advantage of its rural character. Information technology is doing well, but most companies are branches of international companies and vulnerable to restructuring.

• A gap between rich and poor: Highly skilled immigrants are attracted to high-tech jobs, but others don’t have the skills to work in the sector, and unemployment rates are high. Ottawa’s relatively low housing costs also attract migrants from other cities. Have-nots live in multi-family buildings far from transit stations. Relationships among various parts of the city are strained.

• Living online: Most interaction is online, and more people work from home, at large employment nodes and at highrise complexes near transit stations. On-demand vehicles mean there is less of a chance for “unplanned” social interaction. Communities are defined by online relationships and networks as opposed to neighbourhoods. Residents feel less tied to green space and recreational facilities.

• Climate disruption: Climate change has had a visible effect with a loss of green space and urban trees. However, diversified agriculture booms because of new technology and a longer growing season. Abandoned farmland is reclaimed, but there are more algae blooms in lakes and rivers due to run-off. Ottawa struggles to upgrade infrastructure to deal with heat waves, ice storms and floods.

• Green Ottawa: There’s an investment in managing Ottawa River water quality and protecting the urban canopy, but invasive species and extreme weather keep agricultural growth to a minimum. Electrical production is decentralized.

• Doubling down on downtown: Most population growth is inside the Greenbelt, prompting redevelopment of “bungalow-belt” neighbourhoods. There’s a new high-speed rail station downtown. Affordable housing is clustered in highrise developments around transit stations. Suburban growth slows, and suburban neighbourhoods look more like urban villages.

• Decentralized growth: Better transit connections mean some new employers are locating in the suburbs. Orléans, Barrhaven and Kanata have evolved into mixed-use communities more accessible by bicycle and transit, although car ownership remains higher than downtown. Ottawa remains a relatively affordable place to live.

• Tale of two cities: A large corporate headquarters moves to undeveloped land outside the suburbs, bringing100,000 direct and indirect jobs. A new technical university is established nearby, and a “smart” community springs up. Downtown continues to grow and remains the centre of culture and nightlife while the suburbs focus on services for their existing communities, but much new investment goes to the new smart city.

Ottawa is aiming to table a new official plan by the end of 2021. In the next year there will be a flurry of reports and opportunities for residents to get involved, said Harder.

Gordon hopes the scenarios will spark some lively discussion.

“Because it’s 50 years out, I hope people can park their short-term positions. I hope people can talk about what kind of city they want when Ottawa-Gatineau has two or three million people instead of a million.”

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...ture-of-ottawa
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #373  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2019, 6:43 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,307
Crafting a new plan for growth in Ottawa

By: Jan Harder
Published: Feb 5, 2019 7:27am EST


The only thing certain about city planning is that there’s nothing certain about it. Not in absolute terms, anyway.

The notion that the city can promise certainty about what gets built, and where, is a popular one. That’s understandable. No one wants to see such a drastic change in their own neighbourhood that the places we call home become unrecognizable.

But we live in a province that allows anyone to submit an application for any sort of development, and the city is required to give each application due consideration, assessing it against provincial and municipal planning policies.

Think of those policies as guidelines, though, rather than blueprints. Because they cannot be explicit about what must be located where, applications that might push the envelope about what is permitted do sometimes make sense, from a planning perspective. So a building that is significantly bigger or taller than anything surrounding it sometimes gets the go-ahead.

But only if it’s consistent with the city’s Official Plan.

The Official Plan is Ottawa’s single-most comprehensive planning document. It guides decisions about questions such as, “where do density and taller buildings make the most sense,” or, “where is suburban growth more appropriate than maintaining rural lands.”

The Official Plan is also a living document – one that’s updated regularly based on the future that Ottawa residents have told us they hope to see. Every five years, it gets a major review and we incorporate the feedback we gather from residents and businesses.

The city is set to start that review process once again, but this time we’re doing a couple of things differently.

We’ve had more or less the same Official Plan since Ottawa amalgamated. It has been updated, but it’s still based on the initial plan that tied together the existing policies of the various municipalities that were in force before 2003.

A lot has changed since then, so we’re taking the opportunity with this review to look more broadly at what has worked and what hasn’t, and to make more significant changes.

Really, we’re creating a new Official Plan – one with more context-sensitive policies to keep us from painting large parts of the city with the same brush.

Take the suburbs, for example. At present, the Official Plan treats suburbs in Barrhaven, Kanata and Orléans all the same, despite considerable differences in terms of population growth, business interests or transportation needs.

By crafting an Official Plan that’s mindful of such individual contexts, we will ensure future development is adapted to the needs of residents and businesses within each community.

And not just for the next 20 years, but well beyond. That’s the other thing we’re doing differently.

Usually, an Official Plan review looks about two decades down the road, but this time we’re forecasting much further into the future. Over the past couple of years, the city commissioned a study to explore some of the potential challenges that lay ahead and to predict trends that might affect growth over the next 100 years.

A staff report Ottawa Next: Beyond 2036, summarizes the results of that study, which explored a variety of scenarios to identify challenges. With thousands of possible scenarios, an exhaustive list would be impossible, but Ottawa Next explored three possible scenarios for each of four themes: economic development, quality of life, environment, and urban form and mobility.

With the world changing quickly, Ottawa can’t afford to have policy documents that prevent us from adapting to unforeseen challenges. We need to be prepared for the futures we’re most likely to face.

Adding this extra dimension to our Official Plan will help the city set a steady course, both for the next couple of decades and into the next century, as we grow to become the most livable mid-size city in North America.

That’s our goal, and it all starts with the preparatory work we do now to develop our next Official Plan.

We’re going to get there together. We’ll discuss Ottawa Next in more depth at the city’s planning committee on Thursday, Feb. 14. And soon, city staff will be inviting all residents to provide feedback through public consultation meetings, feedback on discussion papers and web surveys, just to name a few.

There is a clear role for every single person to have their say as we craft our new Official Plan over the next three years. And while that might not mean certainty, it does mean a shared vision for the path ahead.

Jan Harder is chair of the City of Ottawa’s Planning Committee and City Councillor for Barrhaven Ward.

https://obj.ca/article/op-ed-craftin...-growth-ottawa
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #374  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2019, 9:09 PM
danishh danishh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 427
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...2046-1.5019145
Quote:
Ottawa 2046: City thinking big with new plan for growth


The City of Ottawa is starting with a clean slate as it embarks on an ambitious plan to become one of North American's most livable mid-sized cities by 2046.

The city is creating an entirely new official plan — the legal document that governs how it grows — rather than simply updating a previous draft.


This is the Gréber Report of right now.

- Coun . Jan Harder

"We don't intend to tinker at the margins," said Steve Wilis, the city's general manager of planning, infrastructure and economic development.

The new plan, which will replace one that dates back to 2003, will be ready in 2021, and will look ahead 25 years.

"Trying to continue to build on a document that really had its origin at a different place, at a different time, really isn't making a lot of sense anymore," said John Smit, the city's director of long-range planning.

[... continued]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #375  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2019, 4:03 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,307
Planning committee wants more public engagement on new official plan

Taylor Blewett, Ottawa Sun
Published: February 14, 2019


On the subject of legal pot or the future of a roof-mounted plastic cow in Orléans, Ottawa residents have made their opinions known. Not so much – at least not historically – on the development of an official plan that serves as the blueprint for Ottawa’s future.

And that’s a problem, planning committee members heard Thursday.

“I feel like I’m at some kind of a wake. I don’t know what’s going on. I don’t know if you’re grasping how vitally important this is going to be,” said Jan Harder, Barrhaven Ward councillor and planning committee chair.

The committee approved the work plan for the city’s new official plan at its Thursday meeting. Public engagement on the official plan is scheduled to begin this month, with the new plan adopted by council and approved by the province by the end of 2021.

“This is the most exciting thing happening in this city. It’s planning our future, my grandchildren’s future, (your) grandchildren’s future,” said Harder.

The official plan sets out a policy framework to guide Ottawa’s physical development, from land-use planning to infrastructure and community development to natural resource management for the next two and a half decades.

“I want people to wake up. I want people to get engaged,” said Harder. “Intensity fires the process.”

Coun. Rick Chiarelli pointed out to his fellow planning committee members that more than 20,000 responses were submitted for a city survey on private cannabis retail in Ottawa.

After that, the second-largest consultation response Chiarelli said he’d seen, “was for that rooftop cow in Orléans where we got nearly 10,000 people writing in to save the thing … Our last official plan got a tiny fraction of that.”

As the Cheddar Et Cetera bovine situation demonstrated, engagement won’t necessarily come from telling people how important a city initiative is — it has to strike a nerve, Chiarelli said.

As Harder explained, the current official plan dates back to 2003, shortly after the City of Ottawa’s amalgamation. She said the relative disinterest in the official planning process at the time could be attributed to amalgamation-era feelings of disconnect. But, kids who in the past would have said they were from Nepean will now tell the councillor they’re from Barrhaven or Ottawa, Harder pointed out. “This is the city that they want.”

And, she took pains to express, engagement with its official plan’s development is vital for their future and the city’s future.

“We’ve got to get this right, because we’re going to go from being the fifth-largest city in Canada to maybe the 10th-largest city in Canada if we’re not smart about it, and that takes options and choices away from you.”

As was pointed out by Stephen Willis, the city’s general manager of planning, infrastructure and economic development, “the pace of social and technological change has increased so rapidly in the last 50 years that the plans we have done have had trouble keeping up.”

For this trend to persist into the future could spell real trouble for Ottawa, city staff and councillors heard at a presentation by Joe Berridge, an urban planner and partner at city building firm Urban Strategies.

He observed that the world is getting “spiky,” meaning that fewer and fewer cities are coming to matter more and more. And what distinguishes a leading city is population growth, immigration, universities, hospitals, transit, libraries – all areas where Ottawa needs to invest attention and resources to get or stay ahead of the pack.

The city’s new official plan will provide that blueprint “for how we move the city forward into the 21st century,” said John Smit, city director of economic development and long-range planning, after Berridge’s presentation.

The city will begin its consultation on the new official plan by collecting feedback on discussion papers it’s slated to release this month that will cover such topics as the economy, housing and rural Ottawa. Engagement will be conducted through the city’s website, social media accounts, and community events.

There will also be targeted engagement with specific groups of “traditionally underrepresented” stakeholders, Willis promised.

https://ottawasun.com/news/local-new...f-5314420af469
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #376  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2019, 3:43 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
here is the City's page on the new OP

https://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/publi...-official-plan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #377  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2019, 12:31 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Dreessen: Neighbourhood plans are the key to quality of life. Will Ottawa's next Official Plan respect this?
Currently, city officials and many councillors seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of what neighbourhood planning is about – which feeds into public disillusionment with the whole process.
https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/co...n-respect-this

ERWIN DREESSEN Updated: August 12, 2019

In 2017 and last year, TVO broadcast a fascinating series by Canadian-Danish urbanist Mikael Colville-Andersen entitled “The Life-Sized City.” In each of the 12 cities he visited around the world (including Windsor/Detroit and Montreal), a common theme was how empowering neighbourhoods results in more innovative solutions to urban form and more satisfactory living. A neighbourhood’s quality of life improves when its residents are intimately involved in shaping its future.

Empowering neighbourhoods was much in fashion in the 1980s and ’90s in Ottawa. A key way towards that goal was to develop neighbourhood plans that embodied the vision, key principles and specific land use designations of the area, within the framework of the municipality’s main Official Plan. This gave residents a real sense of ability to control what their neighbourhoods should look like and how they should evolve.

Before amalgamation, the old City of Ottawa, as well as Nepean, dedicated significant resources to developing neighbourhood plans. Through extensive consultation with each community, a consensus resulted. The plans were then distilled into so-called Secondary Plans (SPs) which were approved by Council and gave them the force of law. Smaller Ottawa-Carleton municipalities, including a number of villages, had their own Official Plan.

By the time of amalgamation in 2001, the new Ottawa had about 36 such Secondary Plans on the books, including former municipalities’ Official Plans, all collected in Volume 2 of the new City’s Official Plan that was adopted in 2003. Since then, some 26 additional Secondary Plans have come into force.

In addition, much effort has gone recently into development of so-called Community Design Plans (CDPs). In greenfields such as Kanata North and Riverside South, these efforts have been led by developers – part of progressing from designated Urban Expansion Area to more detailed planning of the new community. In established areas, the term is essentially the new name for neighbourhood plans. Although CDPs are approved by Ottawa Council, they have no force in law unless they are translated into a Secondary Plan.

Have such planning efforts over the past 30 years empowered neighbourhoods? Answering that question would be an useful research topic for urban planners. An equally interesting question is whether the amendments to Secondary Plans, old and new, which have been numerous, have enjoyed significant consensus of the community.

Recent events suggest that the answer is no, that the trust that had been built up between the City, landowners and the community in achieving the Plan, has subsequently been broken. That was clearly the case when, in July 2018, Council approved an amendment to the Bayview Station SP (originally adopted in 2013), allowing three high-rises of 65, 56 and 27 storeys as the proponent wished, in place of the 30-storey height limit specified in the SP. Community members came out in droves, protesting lack of information – clearly, not enough effort had been put into achieving a consensus. The planning department’s rationale was that the taller buildings would have the same number of units, missing the point completely.

These actions by planning staff and Ottawa Council are ominous signs of a willingness to breach a social contract, and counteract any objective to value and empower neighbourhoods.

This June 27, four items before planning committee each involved disrespect for Secondary Plans. The one that received the most media attention was the shocking failure of The Regional Group, facilitated by planning staff, to respect the agreements that had been built up over many years on the development of the former Oblate lands in Old Ottawa East. Another decision changed the Scott Street SP (originally adopted in February 2014) and a third modified the Wellington Street West SP (originally adopted in 2011), both over the objections of the local community associations and citizens. A fourth item involved an interpretation of “transition” in the SP for Riverside Park that ignored building heights; the plan had been adopted before amalgamation.

These actions by planning staff and Ottawa Council are ominous signs of a willingness to breach a social contract, and counteract any objective to value and empower neighbourhoods. They reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of what neighbourhood planning is about and feed into public disillusion with the planning process.

As part of the desire to come up with a brand new Official Plan, staff has suggested that Volume 2 plans and policies “will be reviewed to remove duplication or conflicting policies and directions.” Will that involve seeing the existing Secondary Plans only as technical details and ignoring that they represent the aspirations of a community? Given the time frame involved (the whole project is to be wrapped up by March 2021) there will be little opportunity to ask what the neighbours think or to build on community visions. In fact, as two councillors have said in light of the events on June 27, citizens see little incentive to participate in planning exercises seeing how easily Council sides with whatever a proponent wants, never mind what the community thinks.

Nothing less than a culture change for both planning staff and Council is required to turn this around.

Erwin Dreessen is a long-time community activist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #378  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2019, 1:00 PM
OTownandDown OTownandDown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,331
lol @ the article title.

No, I hope the City completely ruins the entire quality of life.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #379  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2019, 3:26 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
New Official Plan - High Level Policy Directions report
http://app05.ottawa.ca/sirepub/mtgvi...doctype=AGENDA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #380  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2019, 4:46 PM
Multi-modal Multi-modal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,138
This bullet is a pretty big deal under Policy Direction 3:

Quote:
Where urban expansion may be required in the future (beyond this Plan), consider the potential to expand into the Greenbelt, where not in conflict with natural environment areas, rather than expanding into areas beyond the Greenbelt, and extending the Greenbelt by a corresponding or greater amount of land into existing rural area instead. Expanding urban lands within the Greenbelt is a more efficient use of resources than beyond it.
Although, I don't know how much control the City has in this versus the NCC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:35 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.