HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2015, 4:55 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,316
Condominium Design in Ottawa/Gatineau

Rising up: Higher condos let architects get creative

Patrick Langston, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: March 27, 2015, Last Updated: March 27, 2015 8:00 AM EDT



Claridge’s Icon illustrates some of the ideas being explored in Toronto says its designer. Viewed from Dow’s Lake, there’s a sense of movement.

With excavation now underway at Carling Avenue and Preston Street, Claridge Homes is that much closer to presenting Ottawa with its tallest residential tower: the 45-storey, 128-metre Icon. Of course, the 320–unit condominium won’t stay the tallest forever, not with city council having approved Richcraft Homes’ The Sky, a trio of towers in the same area that will eventually soar to 18, 45 and 55 floors.

And count on it: with condos like Toronto’s The One proposed to rocket 80 floors high, sooner or later someone here will proclaim, “Mine is bigger” and we’ll be craning our necks to gaze upward at 60, 70 or more storeys.

Neighbours may hate these towers for the shadows and swelling populations they bring, but many architects love them for the challenges and creative opportunities their size and prominence offer.

Icon, for example, illustrates some of the ideas being explored in Toronto, says David Pontarini of that city’s Hariri Pontarini Architects, which designed Icon. For example, the “outer edges of these tall buildings, which are typically balconies, can be a lot more sculptural than they traditionally have been; the elevations like the one facing Dow’s Lake can be more fluid.”


While its south side has a sensuous movement, the north-facing side of Claridge’s Icon is more rigid and sober in keeping with the urban landscape it fronts.

Viewed from the lake, the shifting series of doubled-up balconies bring a sensuous movement to a building that could have been yawningly static. They also suggest a reed or long piece of grass — just what you’d find around the lake and its extensive parkland — as well as hinting at musculature to give the building a feeling of strength and self-confidence.

By contrast, the north-facing side of the building is more rigid and sober in keeping with the urban landscape it fronts.

The first condos here and elsewhere tended to the utilitarian in design, says George Dark a Toronto-based planning and urban design consultant who has worked with the City of Ottawa on its plans for key areas like Little Italy. Now, he says, some of the best architects around are turning their talents to these buildings.

While neither is a skyscraper, he points to buildings like Charlesfort’s Art Deco-themed condos Hudson Park and The Merit, both designed by architect Barry Hobin, as examples: “You can’t suggest that Barry Hobin hasn’t laboured over the design.”


Urban planner George Dark points to the Art Deco-themed The Merit by Charlesfort Development as an earlier example of Ottawa buildings that are attracting top architectural talent.

As buildings get taller, he says, their architecture becomes more playful — a good description of the whimsical element in the Dow’s Lake side of Icon.

Ever-taller buildings are also becoming an increasingly interesting mix of retail and office space at the lower levels and residences above, says Dark. Icon, for example, will feature a glassed podium with a restaurant on the main floor, Claridge’s new offices above and then the residential tower. Think of it as a vertical spin on traditional main streets with their ground-level businesses topped by apartments.


Ever-taller buildings are also becoming an increasingly interesting mix of retail and office space at the lower levels and residences above, says Dark. Icon will feature a glassed podium with a restaurant on the main floor and Claridge’s new offices above.

Dark also notes the increasing seriousness with which the City of Ottawa is taking design. For example, when reviewing high-profile building proposals, the city’s Urban Design Review Panel, which assesses the proposals for attractiveness and functionality, sometimes calls in outside experts such as architects Josh Chaiken from New York and Chicago’s Gordon Gill.

In fact, Claridge scouted architects in both the United States and Canada before signing on Hariri Pontarini Architects. That search included discussions with Canadian-born, Los Angeles-based Frank Gehry, the architect of internationally renowned buildings such as the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain.

“The city wanted world-class architecture because (the location) is the gateway to that part of the city,” says Claridge vice-president Shawn Malhotra. “As we’re getting more height and more sophisticated, we’re going with more sophisticated architects.”

(Not that we’re even in the running for really tall buildings. When it’s completed a few years down the road, Saudi Arabia’s needle-nosed Kingdom Tower will jut one kilometre into the sky. That’s the equivalent of almost eight Icons.)


‘You can’t suggest that (architect) Barry Hobin hasn’t laboured over the design,’ urban planner George Dark says of Hudson Park.

Malhotra says today’s buyers also demand that buildings respond more to their expectations. In the case of Icon, for example, the original design called for more fritted or frosted glass on the balconies. But buyers didn’t like how that would cut down their view, especially from inside their units, so Claridge swapped some of the fritted for clear glass.

If Icon’s skyward direction prompted whimsical touches, the shortening of Mastercraft Starwood’s SoHo Italia meant it got more serious. Expected to launch this summer, the building on Preston near Carling was originally intended to be 35 storeys, and that inspired Ottawa architect Rod Lahey, an admirer of Chicago’s stunningly organic 80-storey Aqua tower, to design long, wavy balconies as a tribute to Dow’s Lake.

But when pushback from the city meant SoHo Italia was reduced to 30 storeys with greater setback, some of the original drama of that wavy design was lost.


If Icon’s skyward direction prompted whimsical touches, the shortening of Mastercraft Starwood’s SoHo Italia meant it got more serious. ‘We got wrapped up in the idea of the black Italian suit,’ says architect Rod Lahey. ‘We’ve gone to clean, slick black aluminum and floor-to-ceiling glass.’

With the ode to water off the table, says Lahey, “we got wrapped up in the idea of the black Italian suit, the sleekness of an Italian car. We’ve gone to clean, slick black aluminum and floor-to-ceiling glass.”

The result is a building with etched lines and sharp corners. The glassy podium is articulated with deeply recessed windows while a handful of projecting balconies near the building’s crown add interesting animation and detail.

Lahey has also designed 121 Parkdale north of Wellington Street for Brigil Construction. To the west is the institutional Tunney’s Pasture and to the east the traditionally working class neighbourhood of Mechanicsville. Responding to both neighbours, Lahey has blended brick, stone and curved glass in the 32-storey building.


Responding to its neighbours — Tunney’s Pasture to the west and Mechanicsville to the east — 121 Parkdale blends brick, stone and curved glass in the 32-storey building.

However, when it comes to height, the building makes no bones about its stature.

“You’re better off to celebrate height,” says Lahey. “Today with towers, the first three or four levels are becoming more responsive to the street. After that, celebrate the tower. In New York, you never get the sense of height because there’s so much coming at you from the street level.”

Richcraft’s The Sky promises plenty of street-level action with its public plaza, underground access from the tallest building to the O-Train, and lower-level retail space.

Like Icon, the tall towers especially respond to their mixed natural/urban environment.

“Our premise was to maintain organic shapes (to the south) because of Dow’s Lake, the parkland, so we tried to respond in a natural way by having a curvilinear shape,” architect Enzo Corazza of Toronto’s Graziani Corazza Architects says of the project’s two taller buildings. To the north, the buildings are more “rectilinear” as is the shorter, and therefore less attention-grabbing, 18-storey tower.


Richcraft’s The Sky features a ‘curvilinear shape’ towards Dow’s Lake but straighter lines to the north in keeping with its surroundings, says architect Enzo Corazza.

By shading the buildings, those soft, wraparound balconies facing the lake will also help reduce solar gain in the summer, a problem with some heavily glazed towers, according to Dark.

As to those offset sections in the two taller towers, they’re meant to provide visual interest while the strong horizontals help define the shape of the building.

In designing The Sky, Corazza says he was “not at all” influenced by Ottawa’s architecturally conservative reputation. Rather, he imported bold, simple architectural ideas from other, bigger centres so that from a distance the buildings become iconic.

“This is a district of transition, the whole Carling and Preston area, so we saw this as the western gateway into that district.”

Gems like Parliament Hill and some others aside, Ottawa has been considered banal building central. Thank the spill-over effect of boring, penny-pinching federal office buildings for that, says Lahey. But with this new generation of condos, he sees change coming.

“Are we going to be Shanghai? No. New York? No. But I think we’re seeing a rebirth (of architecture) in the city.”

http://ottawacitizen.com/life/homes/...s-get-creative
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2015, 5:32 PM
MoreTrains MoreTrains is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 858
I find it interesting how Little Italy is the center for close to, if not actually, cutting edge tower designs. If the lines of Icon and The Sky are truely realized, the way that they elevate out of the ground will provide a magnificent skyline from Dows lake. Hopefully growth of Urban Ottawa continues with high growth rates so we can see more of these marvels.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2015, 5:01 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,316
Letter: Time to turn Ottawa into an architectural symphony

The Ottawa Citizen
Published on: March 31, 2015, Last Updated: March 31, 2015 7:07 AM EDT


Re: Rising up: Higher condos let architects get creative, March 28.

The trend that developers are beginning to build tall “signature”-style architecture in Ottawa can only help the look and enhance the vibrancy of downtown Ottawa. Ottawa has made two crucial urban planning mistakes in its day (besides building a hockey arena out way too far, and taking the train station out of downtown): building out instead of up; and, encouraging, or at least not stopping, ugly-looking urban sprawl.

Up until this point the towers that were put up in town were atrocious-looking rectangular boxes of glass and steel, so a change to more interesting looking buildings can only give Ottawa a decent and exciting looking skyline akin to a New York or a Chicago.

As they say, architecture is frozen music, but with the exception of the old colonial buildings in town most of the architectural sounds in Ottawa seriously scratch the ears. Many buildings that were built in the recent past have produced architectural noise. Ouch. Let’s turn the city into an architectural symphony. Hopefully it’s not too late.

Douglas Cornish, Ottawa

http://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/let...tural-symphony
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2015, 7:11 PM
harls's Avatar
harls harls is offline
Mooderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aylmer, Québec
Posts: 19,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by article

With excavation now underway at Carling Avenue and Preston Street, Claridge Homes is that much closer to presenting Ottawa with its tallest residential tower: the 45-storey, 128-metre Icon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2015, 9:18 PM
Urbanarchit Urbanarchit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,910
Quote:
Originally Posted by harls View Post
Looks like they're missing 15 meters.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2015, 11:13 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
It does say 420 feet (128 metres) on the Claridge Icon site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2015, 11:26 PM
Urbanarchit Urbanarchit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,910
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
It does say 420 feet (128 metres) on the Claridge Icon site.
Looks like you are right! Then the thread on this forum has the wrong height listed.

16 meters taller than the current tallest... It does seem tall and with all the floors may have a greater impact, but the height difference doesn't seem like a whole lot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2015, 12:03 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by defishel View Post
Looks like you are right! Then the thread on this forum has the wrong height listed.

16 meters taller than the current tallest... It does seem tall and with all the floors may have a greater impact, but the height difference doesn't seem like a whole lot.
The height is based on plans on the City's website show 143 metres + a 5m mech penthouse... unfortunately it doesn't seem to have been updated recently.
http://app01.ottawa.ca/postingplans/...appId=__9PR9NV

J.OT13 had a post about this a little while ago.

edit: The developer's website has been saying 420 feet even in mid 2013. when their application said 468-484 feet http://web.archive.org/web/201306010...ridgeicon.com/


Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
I just saw that, but it doesn't make sense. Buildings usually have a minimum of 10ft/floor. In this case, 420 feet would end up being 9.3ft/floor. Furthermore, the podium is 6 floors of retail and office space, usually a minimum of 12ft/floor and the lobby is listed as having 15ft ceilings further down their web page. Also, this site lists ceiling heights for the condo units between 9 and 10 feet;
http://www.buzzbuzzhome.com/claridge-icon

Note that the original proposal was for 138m/42 floors (452ft), so I doubt that when the City granted an extra 3 floors, the building would have become shorter.

Here are more sources that are more consistent with the 143m;

Emporis has it listed at 143m;
http://www.emporis.com/building/clar...-ottawa-canada

Skyscrapercity has it at 143m;
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1674589

CBC has it at 143m;
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa...lake-1.1328043

Skyscraperpage has it at 469ft (143m), although still states 42 floors;
http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=41088

Skyscraperpage Ottawa forum has it at 143m;
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=199138


The height is consistently shown as being 143m on every single site except for, unfortunately, the developer's. That said, since 420ft/128m doesn't make sense for a modern 45 storey tower with a 15 foot ground floor, 5 floors of office space and 39 floors of modern condos, I'm convinced that the developer's site is wrong (wouldn't be the first time) and that the actual height is in fact 143m.

Last edited by waterloowarrior; Apr 2, 2015 at 1:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2017, 5:33 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,316
This is a Toronto article, but is equally applicable here, I think:

Quote:
The rise of the balcony

Apartment-dwellers in Toronto are increasingly seeking outdoor spaces, but the balcony poses a complicated riddle for builders

JOHN LORINC
Special to The Globe and Mail Last updated: Wednesday, Aug. 16, 2017 9:38AM EDT


In a city that’s growing up, literally, the (typically) small matter of the apartment balcony has become – perhaps unsurprisingly – a polarizing obsession, and not just among those who live at the north end of an elevator ride home.

An unscientific Facebook survey reveals the full gamut of opinions: condo dwellers for whom the balcony represents a psychological bulwark against claustrophobia; those who revel in the views of the horizon and the street life below; and still others for whom the marketing sizzle gave way to disappointment as wind and noise rendered these outcroppings into little more than storage space.

“The higher up balconies are situated,” observes Ted Kesik, a building-science expert at the University of Toronto, “the less they are used, since high-wind speeds combined with large heights can be unsettling for many people.”

For builders, however, balconies pose a complicated riddle, subject to a tangle of considerations that encompass municipal planning and energy efficiency regulations, market-specific consumer expectations about floor space, and condo corporation rules.

Increasingly, though, they’re also being pressed into service as a means of creating an aesthetic signature for very tall buildings, such as One Bloor East or Five St. Joseph, a 48-storey tower by Graywood Developments and MOD Developments and designed by Hariri Pontarini. “The balconies go beyond outdoor living space,” MOD chief executive Gary Switzer says. “They become part of the sculptural shape of the building.”

He attributes this shift to the legacy of the complex designs by conceived by “starchitects” such as Frank Gehry and Daniel Liebeskind. For high-rise condos, undulating buildings are now technically possible but very expensive if the floor plans for each unit are different. The workaround, Mr. Switzer says, is to use the balconies to create curves and use geometrically interesting shapes to break up towering vertical glass planes on tall towers.

One of the most sensuous examples, says Andre D’Elia, a principal at Superkul, is Studio Gang’s Chicago’s Aqua Tower, which is clad in a cascading sequence of asymmetrical fins that project from the façade. They have a social objective as well as an aesthetic one, he adds: They’ve been configured to allow residents to interact with one another from their balconies. “It’s a noble idea.”

Mid-rise builders, meanwhile, are increasingly looking to create inset balconies instead of protruding ones that offer little more than a few square feet of outdoor space. They make sense because they provide more protection from the elements, says Streetcar’s development manager David Stevenson, citing examples such as The Southwood, a 45-unit project in the Upper Beach.

Mr. Switzer agrees that such balconies can create a clean look as compared to exterior planes broken up by small concrete slabs with glass railings, and MOD, in fact, has incorporated these into its WaterWorks project on Richmond Street. But, he cautions, they can be shadowy, and thus less desirable.

Prof. Kesik, however, notes that in many Nordic cities, inset balconies are used in combination with retractable enclosures, such as those designed by Lumon. “They extend the period of comfortable use by inhabitants and provide shelter from the wind and rain, converting desolate spaces into outdoor rooms.”

Toronto’s preoccupation with balconies dates to planning rules enacted in the 1950s and 1960s, says Mr. Switzer, who points out that in some markets, such as New York, apartment purchasers don’t expect balconies because they’ve not been proscribed by the municipality. Here, he says, conventional wisdom is that consumers demand balconies, even ones unlikely to be used as outdoor living space because they are either too small or too high.

In New York, Mr. Switzer continues, the distinctive built form of the upper east and west sides has been shaped by rules proscribing angular planes to prevent the city streets from becoming permanently shaded canyons.

Those planning policies created a legacy of private outdoor terraces, as have similar rules in Toronto that require developers to create a step-back angular plane on mid-rise buildings that back onto residential neighbourhoods.

In Toronto, the gradual move since the 1980s from slab apartments to narrow point towers meant that balconies became shorter as newer condo floor plans tended to have narrow external walls.

Mr. Stevenson says balconies are today treated as part of a building’s mandated overall outdoor space, but can’t extend over its footprint, which means that the size question becomes a zero-sum game: Larger balconies means less floor space. “It’s tough because you’re trying to make the unit as big as possible.”

Yet both Mr. Stevenson and Mr. Switzer say that growing consumer demand for larger two and three bedroom units has pushed developers and their architects to look for better alternatives to utilitarian slabs of concrete that are merely six feet deep. These include some configurations that were more commonplace a generation ago, such as the wrap-around balconies on some of the two-bedroom units on MOD’s new Massey Tower. With the space those configurations provide, Mr. Switzer says, “You’re getting true outdoor living space.”

(Or at least, that’s the idea.)

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/real...ticle35997696/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2017, 9:07 PM
On Edge On Edge is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 153
They need to mandate concrete dividing walls between units to block sound. In Toronto they all have that. No Ottawa condos for me with neighbours just a drywall sheet away.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2018, 12:50 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,316
Make your pick for the Housing Design People's Choice

Alanna Smith, Ottawa Citizen
Updated: September 7, 2018




Every vote counts.

Especially considering the fierce competition expected to take place for the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association’s (GOHBA) People’s Choice Award.

“It is usually a very tight race for the People’s Choice Award and this is why we encourage as many people to vote as possible,” said Linda Blanchard, chair of the Ottawa Housing Design Awards.

Voting for the coveted award, which has been sponsored by the Ottawa Citizen for the past 25 years, began Aug. 22 and will continue until Sept. 30. Last year, there were over 4,800 votes cast.

Two-time winner Gordon Weima said the award is among his greatest achievements.

“It’s quite an honour,” said Weima, who owns Gordon Weima Design Build. “It’s great to get awards from your peers and people in the industry but to get an award from the general public who looked at a project and said ‘I could live in that house’ — that’s a big deal.”

The People’s Choice Award is the only prize for the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association’s Housing Design Awards that is voted on by the public. The rest are judged by industry professionals from across the country.

Last year, the winning project was Modern Farmhouse by Gordon Weima Design Build and Ardginton + Associates Design Inc. The exterior of the Westboro home mixed stone and cedar shacks while the interior boasts hues of blue and gray and details like plaid and wood bring a country-feel to a city home.

Weima said the project was a success because it reflects the family who lives there.

“It’s a place for them to escape. It’s really comfortable. It’s not over the top. It’s just beautiful. Period,” he said. Weima previously brought home the People’s Choice Award in 2011.

In 2016, Sierra Gate Homes won with a modern-themed infill home and in 2015. Greenmark Builders Inc. won with a home that was both traditional and modern.

“All of these homes were incredibly different from one another,” said Blanchard. “This demonstrates that the public doesn’t necessarily lean towards a particular taste or style but rather they appreciate great design and functionality across all styles.”

Trending this year is bright open spaces with light colours and in some instances pops of brighter colours to contrast. There is also a lean towards modern and contemporary design, she said.

Whatever your interest, Blanchard insists that every ballot counts.

The public will see finalists competing in five categories, all of which have a scheduled voting period (and some have already closed).
  • Renovations + Design: Aug. 22 – Aug. 26
  • Bathrooms: Aug. 29 – Sept. 2
  • Kitchens: Sept. 5 – Sept. 9
  • Custom Homes: Sept. 12 – Sept. 16
  • Production Homes + Condos: Sept. 19 – Sept. 23.
Online voting (gohbavote.ca) begins every Wednesday at 9 a.m. and ends at midnight the following Sunday. The final round of voting will take place between Sept. 26 and Sept. 30.

On Sept. 24, GOHBA will announce the two entries with the most votes in each category. Those 14 finalists will move on to the final round of voting. You can cast your final vote at the Ottawa Fall Home Show, held at the EY Centre from Sept. 27 to Sept. 30.

https://ottawacitizen.com/life/homes...peoples-choice
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2018, 1:34 PM
OTownandDown OTownandDown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
Make your pick for the Housing Design People's Choice

Alanna Smith, Ottawa Citizen
Updated: September 7, 2018




Every vote counts.

Especially considering the fierce competition expected to take place for the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association’s (GOHBA) People’s Choice Award.

“It is usually a very tight race for the People’s Choice Award and this is why we encourage as many people to vote as possible,” said Linda Blanchard, chair of the Ottawa Housing Design Awards.

Voting for the coveted award, which has been sponsored by the Ottawa Citizen for the past 25 years, began Aug. 22 and will continue until Sept. 30. Last year, there were over 4,800 votes cast.

Two-time winner Gordon Weima said the award is among his greatest achievements.

“It’s quite an honour,” said Weima, who owns Gordon Weima Design Build. “It’s great to get awards from your peers and people in the industry but to get an award from the general public who looked at a project and said ‘I could live in that house’ — that’s a big deal.”

The People’s Choice Award is the only prize for the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association’s Housing Design Awards that is voted on by the public. The rest are judged by industry professionals from across the country.

Last year, the winning project was Modern Farmhouse by Gordon Weima Design Build and Ardginton + Associates Design Inc. The exterior of the Westboro home mixed stone and cedar shacks while the interior boasts hues of blue and gray and details like plaid and wood bring a country-feel to a city home.

Weima said the project was a success because it reflects the family who lives there.

“It’s a place for them to escape. It’s really comfortable. It’s not over the top. It’s just beautiful. Period,” he said. Weima previously brought home the People’s Choice Award in 2011.

In 2016, Sierra Gate Homes won with a modern-themed infill home and in 2015. Greenmark Builders Inc. won with a home that was both traditional and modern.

“All of these homes were incredibly different from one another,” said Blanchard. “This demonstrates that the public doesn’t necessarily lean towards a particular taste or style but rather they appreciate great design and functionality across all styles.”

Trending this year is bright open spaces with light colours and in some instances pops of brighter colours to contrast. There is also a lean towards modern and contemporary design, she said.

Whatever your interest, Blanchard insists that every ballot counts.

The public will see finalists competing in five categories, all of which have a scheduled voting period (and some have already closed).
  • Renovations + Design: Aug. 22 – Aug. 26
  • Bathrooms: Aug. 29 – Sept. 2
  • Kitchens: Sept. 5 – Sept. 9
  • Custom Homes: Sept. 12 – Sept. 16
  • Production Homes + Condos: Sept. 19 – Sept. 23.
Online voting (gohbavote.ca) begins every Wednesday at 9 a.m. and ends at midnight the following Sunday. The final round of voting will take place between Sept. 26 and Sept. 30.

On Sept. 24, GOHBA will announce the two entries with the most votes in each category. Those 14 finalists will move on to the final round of voting. You can cast your final vote at the Ottawa Fall Home Show, held at the EY Centre from Sept. 27 to Sept. 30.

https://ottawacitizen.com/life/homes...peoples-choice
I don't understand. I clicked on the link, and it seems like this is a vote for Ottawa's best bathroom?
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:32 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.